Expert answer:Assignment 4: Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution an
Answer & Explanation:ASSIGNMENT 4 RUBIC.docx Week 7 Assignment 4 – Submit HereStudents, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 4: Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution and AdvantagesDue Week 7 and worth 200 pointsUsing feedback from your professor and classmates, revise Part 1 and develop the solution and identify the advantages of the solution. Note: The disadvantages or challenges with your answers will be in Part 3.Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:Provide Part I: Revision of A Problem Exists (3-4 pages)1. Revise, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part I: A Problem Exists. Develop Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages (3-4 pages for 6-8 pages total)2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. (The thesis statement may need to be modified to reflect added information and purpose of this part.)3. Explain a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.4. State, explain, and support the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.5. State, explain, and support the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.6. State, explain, and support the third (and fourth if desired) advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.8. Provide a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages.9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategies (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain advantages. 11. Support advantage claims with at least three (3) additional quality relevant references. Use at least six (6) total for Parts 1 and 2. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.Note: Submit your assignment to the designated plagiarism program so that you can make revisions before submitting your paper to your professor. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis statement. Recognize the use of summary, paraphrasing, and quotation to communicate the main points of a text.Analyze the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, logos in writing samples and for incorporation into essays or presentations.Correct grammatical and stylistic errors consistent with Standard Written English. Prepare a research project that supports an argument with structure and format appropriate to the genre.Revise drafts to improve clarity, support, and organization. Recognize how to organize ideas with transitional words, phrases, and sentences.Incorporate relevant, properly documented sources to substantiate ideas.Write clearly and concisely about selected topics using proper writing mechanics. Use technology and information resources to research selected issues for this course.Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.
assignment_4_rubic.docx
rubric_details_from_assignment_3.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and
language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 200
Assignment 4: Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution and Advantages
Â
Criteria
1. Revise, using
feedback from the
professor and
classmates, your
Persuasive Paper
Part 1: A Problem
Exists.
Weight: 5%
2. Include a
defensible, relevant
thesis statement
clearly in the first
paragraph.
Weight: 5%
3. Explain a detailed,
viable solution that
supports your thesis.
This should be one or
two (1-2) paragraphs.
Weight: 5%
4. State, explain, and
support the first
advantage
(economic, social,
political,
environmental,
social, equitable,
ethical/moral, etc.) to
your solution. This
should be one or two
(1-2) paragraphs.
Weight: 10%
5. State, explain, and
support the second
advantage
(economic, social,
political,
Â
Â
Â
Unacceptable
Meets
Minimum
Expectations
Fair
Proficient
Exemplary
Below 60% F
60-69% D
70-79% C
80-89% B
90-100% A
Did not submit or
incompletely
revised, using
feedback from
the professor and
classmates, your
Persuasive Paper
Part 1: A Problem
Exists.
Insufficiently
revised, using
feedback from
the professor
and
classmates,
your
Persuasive
Paper Part 1: A
Problem Exists.
Partially revised,
using feedback
from the professor
and classmates,
your Persuasive
Paper Part 1: A
Problem Exists.
Did not submit or
incompletely
included a
defensible,
relevant thesis
statement clearly
in the first
paragraph.
Did not submit or
incompletely
explained, in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs, a
detailed, viable
solution that
supports your
thesis.
Did not submit or
incompletely
stated, explained,
and supported
the first
advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social, equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Did not submit or
incompletely
Insufficiently
included a
defensible,
relevant thesis
statement
clearly in the
first paragraph.
Partially included
a defensible,
relevant thesis
statement clearly
in the first
paragraph.
Satisfactorily
revised, using
feedback from
the professor
and
classmates,
your
Persuasive
Paper Part 1:
A Problem
Exists.
Satisfactorily
included a
defensible,
relevant thesis
statement
clearly in the
first paragraph.
Thoroughly
revised, using
feedback from
the professor
and
classmates,
your
Persuasive
Paper Part 1: A
Problem
Exists.
Thoroughly
included a
defensible,
relevant thesis
statement
clearly in the
first paragraph.
Insufficiently
explained, in
one or two (12) paragraphs,
a detailed,
viable solution
that supports
your thesis.
Partially
explained, in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs, a
detailed, viable
solution that
supports your
thesis.
Satisfactorily
explained, in
one or two (12) paragraphs,
a detailed,
viable solution
that supports
your thesis.
Thoroughly
explained, in
one or two (12) paragraphs,
a detailed,
viable solution
that supports
your thesis.
Insufficiently
stated,
explained, and
supported the
first advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social,
equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Insufficiently
stated,
explained, and
supported the
second
Partially stated,
explained, and
supported the first
advantage
(economic, social,
political,
environmental,
social, equitable,
ethical/moral, etc.)
to your solution in
one or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Satisfactorily
stated,
explained, and
supported the
first advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social,
equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Satisfactorily
stated,
explained, and
supported the
second
Thoroughly
stated,
explained, and
supported the
first advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social,
equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Thoroughly
stated,
explained, and
supported the
second
stated, explained,
and supported
Partially stated,
explained, and
supported the
second
advantage
environmental,
social, equitable,
ethical/moral, etc.) to
your solution. This
should be one or two
(1-2) paragraphs.
Weight: 10%
6. State, explain, and
support the third (and
fourth if desired)
advantage
(economic, social,
political,
environmental,
social, equitable,
ethical/moral, etc.) to
your solution. This
should be one or two
(1-2) paragraphs.
Weight: 10%
7. Provide a
concluding paragraph
/ transitional
paragraph that
summarizes the
proposed solution
and its advantages.
Weight:10%
8. Develop a
coherently structured
paper with effective
transitional words,
phrases, sentences
and  an introduction,
body, and conclusion.
Weight: 10%
9. Support advantage
claims with at least
three (3) additional
quality relevant
references (at least
six (6) total for Parts
1 and 2).
Weight: 10%
10. Clarity, writing
mechanics, and
formatting
requirements
the second
advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social, equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Did not submit or
incompletely
stated, explained,
and supported
the third
advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social, equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social,
equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Insufficiently
stated,
explained, and
supported the
third advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social,
equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
(economic, social,
political,
environmental,
social, equitable,
ethical/moral, etc.)
to your solution in
one or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social,
equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Satisfactorily
stated,
explained, and
supported the
third
advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social,
equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Satisfactorily
provided a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph that
summarizes
the proposed
solution and its
advantages.
advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social,
equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Thoroughly
stated,
explained, and
supported the
third
advantage
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
social,
equitable,
ethical/moral,
etc.) to your
solution in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Thoroughly
provided a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph that
summarizes
the proposed
solution and its
advantages.
Did not submit or
incompletely
provided a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph that
summarizes the
proposed solution
and its
advantages.
Did not submit or
incompletely
developed a
coherently
structured paper
with an
introduction,
body, and
conclusion.
Insufficiently
provided a
concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph that
summarizes
the proposed
solution and its
advantages.
Partially provided
a concluding
paragraph /
transitional
paragraph that
summarizes the
proposed solution
and its
advantages.
Insufficiently
developed a
coherently
structured
paper with an
introduction,
body, and
conclusion.
Partially
developed a
coherently
structured paper
with an
introduction, body,
and conclusion.
Satisfactorily
developed a
coherently
structured
paper with an
introduction,
body, and
conclusion.
Thoroughly
developed a
coherently
structured
paper with an
introduction,
body, and
conclusion.
No references
provided
Does not meet
the required
number of
references; all
references
poor quality
choices.
Does not meet the
required number
of references;
some references
poor quality
choices.
Meets number
of required
references;
most
references
high quality
choices.
Meets number
of required
references; all
references
high quality
choices.
More than 8
errors present
7-8 errors
present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors
present
0-2 errors
present
Partially stated,
explained, and
supported the
third advantage
(economic, social,
political,
environmental,
social, equitable,
ethical/moral, etc.)
to your solution in
one or two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Weight: 25%
Current Location
Rubric Detail
SKIP TO COURSE MENU SKIP TO TOP FRAME TABS
You can interact with a rubric to grade in Grid View or List View. More Help
Content
Name: ENG215 Week 5 Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1 – A Problem Exists
Description: ENG215 Week 5 Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1 – A Problem Exists
Exit
Grid View
List View
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
ENG215-A3-1
1. Provide an
appropriate title and
an interesting
opening paragraph
to appeal to your
stated audience
(appeal with logic,
ethics, or emotion).
Weight: 5%
ENG215-A3-2
2. Included a
defensible, relevant
thesis statement in
the first paragraph.
(Revised from
Assignment 2)
Weight: 5%
Points Range: 0
(0%) – 4.48
(2.99%)
Did not submit or
incompletely
provided an
appropriate title
and an interesting
opening
paragraph to
appeal to your
stated audience.
Feedback:
Points Range: 0
(0%) – 4.48
(2.99%)
Did not submit or
incompletely
included a
defensible,
relevant thesis
statement in the
first paragraph,
revised from
Assignment 2.
Feedback:
Meets Minimum
Expectations 6069% D
Proficient 8089% B
Exemplary 90100% A
Points Range: 4.5 Points Range:
(3%) – 5.24
5.25 (3.5%) (3.49%)
5.98 (3.99%)
Points Range: 6
(4%) – 6.74
(4.49%)
Points: 7.12
(4.75%)
Points Range:
6.75 (4.5%) – 7.5
(5%)
Insufficiently
provided an
appropriate title
and an interesting
opening
paragraph to
appeal to your
stated audience.
Feedback:
Satisfactorily
provided an
appropriate title
and an interesting
opening
paragraph to
appeal to your
stated audience.
Feedback:
Fair 70-79% C
Partially provided
an appropriate
title and an
interesting
opening
paragraph to
appeal to your
stated audience.
Feedback:
Points Range: 4.5
Points Range:
(3%) – 5.24
5.25 (3.5%) (3.49%)
5.98 (3.99%)
Points Range: 6
(4%) – 6.74
(4.49%)
Insufficiently
included a
defensible,
relevant thesis
statement in the
first paragraph,
revised from
Assignment 2.
Feedback:
Satisfactorily
included a
defensible,
relevant thesis
statement in the
first paragraph,
revised from
Assignment 2.
Feedback:
Partially included
a defensible,
relevant thesis
statement in the
first paragraph,
revised from
Assignment 2.
Feedback:
Thoroughly
provided an
appropriate title
and an interesting
opening
paragraph to
appeal to your
stated audience.
Points: 7.12
(4.75%)
Points Range:
6.75 (4.5%) – 7.5
(5%)
Thoroughly
included a
defensible,
relevant thesis
statement in the
first paragraph,
revised from
Assignment 2.
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum
Expectations 6069% D
Points Range: 0
(0%) – 4.48
(2.99%)
Fair 70-79% C
Points Range: 4.5
Points Range:
(3%) – 5.24
5.25 (3.5%) ENG215-A3-3
(3.49%)
Did not submit or
5.98 (3.99%)
3. Describe the
incompletely
history and status of
Insufficiently
described, in one
Partially
the issue and
described, in one
or two (1-2)
described, in one
provide an overview
or two (1-2)
paragraphs, the
or two (1-2)
of the problem(s)
paragraphs, the
history and status
paragraphs, the
that need to be
history and status
of the issue
history and status
addressed. This
of the issue and
paragraphs and
of the issue and
should be one or
insufficiently
did not submit or
partially provided
two (1-2)
provided an
incompletely
an overview of
paragraphs.
overview of the
provided an
the problem(s)
Weight:5%
problem(s) that
overview of the
that need to be
need to be
problem(s) that
addressed..
addressed.
need to be
Feedback:
Feedback:
addressed.
Feedback:
Points Range: 0
(0%) – 8.98
(5.99%)
ENG215-A3-4
4. Explain the first
problem (economic,
social, political,
environmental,
complexity, inequity,
ethical/moral, etc.)
and provide support
for your claims. This
should be one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Weight:10%
ENG215-A3-5
5. Explain the
second problem
(economic, social,
political,
environmental,
complexity, inequity,
ethical/moral, etc.)
and provide support
for your claims. This
should be one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Weight:10%
Proficient 8089% B
Exemplary 90100% A
Points Range: 6
(4%) – 6.74
(4.49%)
Points: 7.12
(4.75%)
Points Range:
6.75 (4.5%) – 7.5
(5%)
Satisfactorily
described, in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs, the
history and status
of the issue and
satisfactorily
provided an
overview of the
problem(s) that
need to be
addressed.
Feedback:
Thoroughly
described, in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs the
history and status
of the issue and
thoroughly
provided an
overview of the
problem(s) that
need to be
addressed.
Points: 14.25
Points Range: 12 (9.5%)
Points Range:
(8%) – 13.48
Points Range:
10.5 (7%) – 11.98
(8.99%)
13.5 (9%) – 15
(7.99%)
Did not submit or
(10%)
incompletely
Insufficiently
Satisfactorily
Partially
explained, in one explained, in one
explained, in one Thoroughly
explained, in one
or two (1-2)
or two (1-2)
or two (1-2)
explained, in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs, the paragraphs, the
paragraphs, the or two (1-2)
paragraphs, the
first problem
first problem
first problem
paragraphs, the
first problem
(economic,
(economic,
(economic,
first problem
(economic,
social, political,
social, political,
social, political,
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
environmental,
environmental,
social, political,
environmental,
complexity,
complexity,
complexity,
environmental,
complexity,
inequity,
inequity,
inequity,
complexity,
inequity,
ethical/moral,
ethical/moral,
ethical/moral,
inequity,
ethical/moral,
etc.) and did not etc.) and
etc.) and
ethical/moral,
etc.) and partially
submit or
insufficiently
satisfactorily
etc.) and
provided support
incompletely
provided support
provided support thoroughly
for your claims.
provided support for your claims.
for your claims.
provided support
Feedback:
for your claims.
Feedback:
Feedback:
for your claims.
Feedback:
Points: 14.25
Points Range: 0 Points Range: 9 Points Range:
Points Range: 12 (9.5%)
(0%) – 8.98
(6%) – 10.48
10.5 (7%) – 11.98 (8%) – 13.48
Points Range:
(5.99%)
(6.99%)
(7.99%)
(8.99%)
13.5 (9%) – 15
(10%)
Did not submit or Insufficiently
Partially
Satisfactorily
incompletely
explained, in one explained, in one explained, in one Thoroughly
explained, in one or two (1-2)
or two (1-2)
or two (1-2)
explained, in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs, the paragraphs, the paragraphs, the or two (1-2)
paragraphs, the second problem second problem second problem paragraphs, the
second problem (economic,
(economic,
(economic,
second problem
(economic,
social, political,
social, political,
social, political,
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
environmental,
environmental,
social, political,
environmental,
complexity,
complexity,
complexity,
environmental,
Points Range: 9
(6%) – 10.48
(6.99%)
Meets Minimum
Expectations 6069% D
complexity,
inequity,
inequity,
ethical/moral,
ethical/moral,
etc.) and
etc.) and did not insufficiently
submit or
provided support
incompletely
for your claims.
provided support Feedback:
for your claims.
Feedback:
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Points Range: 0
(0%) – 8.98
(5.99%)
ENG215-A3-6
6. Explain the third
problem (economic,
social, political,
environmental,
complexity, inequity,
ethical/moral, etc.)
and provide support
for your claims. This
should be one or
two (1-2)
paragraphs.
Weight:10%
ENG215-A3-7
7. Provide a
concluding
paragraph that
summarizes the
stated problems and
promises a solution.
Weight:10%
ENG215-A3-8
8. Develop a
coherently
structured paper
with transitional
words, phrases, and
sentences. an
introduction, body,
and conclusion.
Weight: 10%
Fair 70-79% C
inequity,
ethical/moral,
etc.) and partially
provided support
for your claims.
Feedback:
Proficient 8089% B
Exemplary 90100% A
inequity,
ethical/moral,
etc.) and
satisfactorily
provided support
for your claims.
Feedback:
complexity,
inequity,
ethical/moral,
etc.) and
thoroughly
provided support
for your claims.
Points: 14.25
Points Range: 12 (9.5%)
Points Range:
(8%) – 13.48
Points Range:
10.5 (7%) – 11.98
(8.99%)
13.5 (9%) – 15
(7.99%)
Did not submit or
(10%)
incompletely
Insufficiently
Satisfactorily
Partially
explained, in one explained, in one
explained, in one Thoroughly
explained, in one
or two (1-2)
or two (1-2)
or two (1-2)
explained, in one
or two (1-2)
paragraphs, the paragraphs, the
paragraphs, the or two (1-2)
paragraphs, the
third problem
third problem
third problem
paragraphs, the
third problem
(economic,
(economic,
(economic,
third problem
(economic,
social, political,
social, political,
social, political,
(economic,
social, political,
environmental,
environmental,
environmental,
social, political,
environmental,
complexity,
complexity,
complexity,
environmental,
complexity,
inequity,
inequity,
inequity,
complexity,
inequity,
ethical/moral,
ethical/moral,
ethical/moral,
inequity,
ethical/moral,
etc.) and did not etc.) and
etc.) and
ethical/moral,
etc.) and partially
submit or
insufficiently
satisfactorily
etc.) and
provided support
incompletely
provided support
provided support thoroughly
for your claims.
provided support for your claims.
for your claims.
provided support
Feedback:
for your claims.
Feedback:
Feedback:
for your claims.
Feedback:
Points Range: 0
(0%) – 8.98
(5.99%)
Points Range: 9
(6%) – 10.48
(6.99%)
Points Range: 9
(6%) – 10.48
(6.99%)
Did not submit or
incompletely
provided a
concluding
paragraph that
summarizes the
stated problems
and promises a
solution.
Feedback:
Insufficiently
provided a
concluding
paragraph that
summarizes the
stated problems
and promises a
solution.
Feedback:
Points Range: 0
(0%) – 8.98
(5.99%)
Points Range: 9
(6%) – 10.48
(6.99%)
Did not submit or
incompletely
developed a
coherently
structured paper
with an
Insufficiently
developed a
coherently
structured paper
with an
introduction,
Points: 14.25
Points Range: 12 (9.5%)
Points Range:
(8%) – 13.48
Points Range:
10.5 (7%) – 11.98
(8.99%)
13.5 (9%) – 15
(7.99%)
(10%)
Satisfactorily
Partially provided
provided a
Thoroughly
a concluding
concluding
provided a
paragraph that
paragraph that
concluding
summarizes the
summarizes the paragraph that
stated problems
stated problems summarizes the
and promises a
and promises a stated problems
solution.
solution.
and promises a
Feedback:
Feedback:
solution.
Points: 14.25
Points Range:
Points Range: 12 (9.5%)
10.5 (7%) – 11.98 (8%) – 13.48
Points Range:
(7.99%)
(8.99%)
13.5 (9%) – 15
(10%)
Partially
Satisfactorily
developed a
developed a
Thoroughly
coherently
coherently
developed a
structured paper structured paper coherently
with an
with an
structured paper
introduction,
introduction,
with an
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
introduction,
body, and
conclusion.
Feedback:
ENG215-A3-9
9. Support claims
with at least three (3)
quality, relevant
references.
Weight: 10%
Points Range: 0
(0%) – 8.98
(5.99%)
ENG215-A3-10
10. Clarity, writing
mechanics, and
formatting
requirements
Weight: 25%
Points Range: 0
(0%) – 22.48
(14.99%)
No references
provided
Feedback:
Meets Minimum
Expectations 60- Fair 70-79% C
69% D
body, and
body, and
conclusion.
conclusion.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points Range: 9
(6%) – 10.48
(6.99%)
Does not meet
the required
number of
references; all
references poor
quality choices.
Feedback:
Proficient 8089% B
body, and
conclusion.
Feedback:
introduction,
body, and
conclusion.
Points: 14.25
Points Range:
Points Range: 12 (9.5%)
10.5 (7%) – 11.98
(8%) – 13.48
Points Range:
(7.99%)
(8.99%)
13.5 (9%) – 15
(10%)
Does not meet
Meets number of
the required
required
Meets number of
number of
references; most required
references; some
references high references; all
references poor
quality choices. references high
quality choices.
Feedback:
quality choices.
Feedback:
Points: 35.62
Points Range: 30 (23.75%)
(20%) – 33.74
Points Range:
(22.49%)
33.75 (22.5%) 37.5 (25%)
7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
0-2 errors present
Points Range:
22.5 (15%) 26.24 (17.49%)
P …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades