Expert answer:Employee Use of Internet At Work: Policy Proposals
Expert answer:Your consulting services have been requested by the CEO of a Fortune 500 company. The CEO is concerned about the use of the internet at work and employs your consulting services to discuss her concerns. Primarily, she is concerned that employees might be abusing the internet and is wondering what repercussions the company might face in a variety of legal areas, specifically with respect to the legal environment of business, ethics, and human resources issues. She is also concerned with preventing abuse of the internet at all levels, from low-level employees to the Board of Directors.She requests a memo from you regarding:Possible torts that could be committed by employees who use the internet at workPossible crimes that could be committed by employees who use the internet at work (and indicate whether the crimes are white collar or blue collar)Liability of the corporation versus liability of the individual employee through commission of torts orcrimes using the internet at workWhether violations of the duty of care or duty of loyalty could exist through use of social media sites at workEmployee privacy rights or concerns that exist regarding use of the internet at workEmployment laws that protect the employee or the employer with respect to use of the internet at work.Identify two policies that this CEO could put in place to curb the potential for abuse of the internet at work, with one policy that addresses low-level employees and one policy that is targeted for the board of directors. Keep in mind the business judgment rule with respect to the latter policy and discuss whether it might ever be invoked toenforce or ignore such a policy. Articulate your ideas on how to remedy the issue of corporate malfeasance that occurs through abuse of the internet at work. Proffer some clear recommendations to the CEO about how to improve overall corporate governance by reducing the potential for abuse of the internet at work.You must also clearly address ethical issues that arise regarding your policies; note that ethical issues might exist on behalf of the employee if your policies are not utilized, but ethical issues might exist on behalf of the employer if the polices are implemented.The CEO intends to pass along this memo to other employees in the company who might not have a strong understanding of these concepts. Thus, you are also requested to clearly explain and define the legal concepts you raise. She also is concerned about offending employees with policy suggestions and requests you keep this in mind with your suggested policies.This issue exists in many companies and corporations, so you are encouraged to research outside sources for data supporting policies to reduce abuse of the internet at work. Demonstrate critical thinking by analyzing, evaluating, and interpreting appropriate policies to provide an original perspective to enhance corporate legal and ethical environs as they relate to use of the internet at work.You are expected to convey complex ideas in a clear, concise and organized fashion, using the required and recommended readings from the course for analytical support. Although you are encouraged to cite from your textbook, you are required to cite a minimum of four scholarly sources (beyond the textbook) to support your statements. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these sources.Your well-written paper should be 8-10 pages in length, not including the title or references pages. Review the Portfolio grading rubric, which can be accessed from the Course Information page, and make sure to follow the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. Please be sure to reach out to your instructor at any point in the course if you have questions about the assignment.
mgt320_portfolioprojectrubric.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
MGT320
Portfolio Project Rubric
Criteria
Meets Expectation
Approaches Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
25-30 Points
19-24 Points
Preliminary
Delivered topic with tentative Delivered topic with
Deliverables
policy suggestions and
tentative policy suggestions
sources in Week 5.
and sources in Week 5 as
required with significant but
not major omissions or
errors.
33-40 Points
25-32 Points
Requirements The Portfolio includes all of
The Portfolio includes most
the required components, as of the required
specified in the assignment.
components, as specified in
the assignment.
Content
Critical
Analysis
Synthesis and
Evaluation
Sources
33-40 Points
Demonstrates strong or
adequate knowledge of
ethical and legal issues in
corporations and businesses
as they relate to this project;
correctly represents
knowledge from the readings
and sources.
41-50 Points
Provides strong or adequate
thought, insight, and analysis
of the ethical and legal issues
surrounding the proposed
policy, in comparison with
the policy it is to replace.
41-50 Points
Demonstrates strong or
adequate synthesis and
evaluation of course
concepts in policy
recommendations.
33-40 Points
Cites and integrates at least
four credible sources.
33-40 Points
Application of Sources well or adequately
Source
chosen to provide substance
Material
and perspectives on the
issue; knowledge from the
course linked properly to
source material.
Mechanics and Writing
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
13-18 Points
Delivered topic with
tentative policy
suggestions and
sources in Week 5 as
required with major
omissions or errors.
17-24 Points
The Portfolio includes
some of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
7-12 Points
Did not deliver topic
with tentative
policy suggestions
and sources in
Week 5 as required.
9-16 Points
The Portfolio
includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
9-16 Points
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials.
25-32 Points
Some significant but not
major errors or omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge.
17-24 Points
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge.
31-40 Points
Some significant but not
major errors or omissions in
thought, insight and
analysis.
21-30 Points
Major errors or
omissions in thought,
insight and analysis.
11-20 Points
Fails to
demonstrate
thought, insight and
analysis.
31-40 Points
Some significant but not
major errors or omissions in
synthesis and evaluation.
21-30 Points
Major errors or
omissions in synthesis
and evaluation.
11-20 Points
Fails to
demonstrate
synthesis and
evaluation.
25-32 Points
Cites and integrates three
credible sources.
17-24 Points
Cites and integrates
one or two credible
sources.
17-24 Points
Major problems with
selection and linkage
of sources.
9-16 Points
Cites and integrates
no credible sources.
25-32 Points
Some significant but not
major problems with
selection and linkage of
sources.
9-16 Points
Source selection is
seriously flawed; no
linkage to
knowledge from the
course.
MGT320
Portfolio Project Rubric
Organization
Grammar and
Style
Demonstrates
proper use of
APA style
17-20 Points
Project is clearly organized,
well written, and in proper
essay format including an
introduction, body, and
conclusion. Conforms to
project requirements.
17-20 Points
Strong sentence and
paragraph structure; few or
no minor errors in grammar
and spelling; appropriate
writing style; clear and
concise with no unsupported
comments.
17-20 Points
Project contains proper APA
formatting, according to the
CSU-Global Guide to Writing
and APA Requirements, with
no more than one significant
error.
Total points possible = 350
13-16 Points
Small number of significant
but not major flaws in
organization and writing; is
in proper essay format. In a
minor way does not
conform to project
requirements.
9-12 Points
Major problems in
organization and
writing; does not
completely follow
proper essay format.
In a significant way
does not conform to
project requirements.
13-16 Points
9-12 Points
Small number of significant Inconsistent to
but not major errors in
inadequate sentence
grammar and spelling;
and paragraph
generally appropriate
development; work
writing.
needed on grammar
and spelling; does not
meet program
expectations.
13-16 Points
9-12 Points
Few errors in APA
Significant errors in
formatting, according to the APA formatting,
CSU-Global Guide to Writing according to the CSUand APA Requirements,
Global Guide to
Writing and APA
with no more than two to
Requirements, with
three significant errors.
four to five significant
errors.
5-8 Points
Project is not well
organized or well
written and is not in
proper essay
format. Does not
conform to project
requirements.
5-8 Points
Poor quality;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar
and/or spelling;
inappropriate
writing style that
interferes with
clarity.
5-8 Points
Numerous errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA
Requirements, with
more than five
significant errors.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades