Expert answer:Addressing behavioral risk factors

Expert answer:Discussion: Addressing Behavioral Risk Factors“It is unreasonable to expect that people will change their behavior easily when so many forces in the social, cultural, and physical environment conspire against such change”(Kovner and Knickman, p. 139).When seeking to lessen behavioral risk factors in different populations, one of the greatest challenges is addressing the systemic issues within the population that enable the risky behavior to occur in the first place. Consider the health risks of school-age children not being immunized or drug users sharing needles. As Dr. Beilenson discussed in the Week 4 media program, these risky behaviors led to increases in individual and population health problems. Thus, when planning health prevention programs, it is important to consider how to effectively address risky behaviors at both the individual and the population level.The Discussion this week focuses on the use of the Population-Based Intervention Model outlined in the course text Health Care Delivery in the United States, as well as how this model can be applied to strengthen advocacy programs.To prepare:Select one of the behavioral risk factors from the Healthy Population 2010 Objectives (listed in Table 7.1 on p. 122 of the course text) that is of interest to you.Using the Walden Library and other credible websites, research how this risk factor is affecting your community or state.With your selected risk factor in mind, review the information on the Population-Based Intervention Model on pp. 132-137 in the course text, Health Care Delivery in the United States. In particular, focus on the concept of downstream, midstream, and upstream interventions. Consider at least one intervention that could be put into place at each stagRUBRICMain Posting:Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.–Outstanding Performance 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)Excellent Performance 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)Competent Performance 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Proficient Performance 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)Main Posting:Writing–Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Main Posting:Timely and full participation–Outstanding Performance 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Outstanding Performance 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Excellent Performance 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Competent Performance 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Proficient Performance 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)First Response: Writing–Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)First Response:Timely and full participation–Outstanding Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Second Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Outstanding Performance 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Excellent Performance 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Competent Performance 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Proficient Performance 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Second Response:Writing–Outstanding Performance 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Competent Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Proficient Performance 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Second Response:Timely and full participation–Outstanding Performance 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Excellent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Competent Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Proficient Performance 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Room for Improvement 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
learning_discussion_resources.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course
Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Knickman, J. R., & Kovner, A. R. (Eds.). (2015). Health care delivery in the united states (11th
ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
• Chapter 7, “Health and Behavior” (pp. 119–144)
This chapter discusses the role of behavior on health and describes behavioral risk factors
and potential community-based interventions.
Backer, E. L., Geske, J. A., McIlvain, H. E., Dodendorf, D. M., & Minier, W. C. (2005).
Improving female preventive health care delivery through practice change: An Every Woman
Matters study. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 18(5), 401–408.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
This article informs the Assignment as an example of a health program that was not successful.
You will conduct additional research on this topic to determine current advocacy programs that
have been more effective.
Hancock, C., & Cooper, K. (2011). A global initiative to tackle chronic disease by changing
lifestyles. Primary Health Care, 21(4), 24–26.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
This article details the efforts of the C3 Collaborating for Health charity. In particular, C3
focuses on minimizing the risk factors of poor dieting, smoking, and low physical activity.
Schwartz, S. M., Ireland, C., Strecher, V., Nakao, D., Wang, C., & Juarez, D. (2010). The
economic value of a wellness and disease prevention program. Population Health Management,
13(6), 309–317.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
The authors of this article detail a study that sought to determine the economic consequences of a
disease prevention program conducted by the Hawaii Medical Service Association.
Tengland, P. (2010). Health promotion and disease prevention: Logically different conceptions?
Health Care Analysis, 18(4), 323–341.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
This article investigates the differences and causal connections between health promotion and
disease prevention.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment

How it works

1. Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
2. Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions 
3. Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
4.  Download the paper after the writer uploads it 

Will the writer plagiarize my essay?

You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.

Is this service safe?

All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades