Expert answer:Case brief: Reasonable suspicion 4th Amendment: U.S. v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2001) Case Brief Guidelines Case briefs will be written in the following format (mandatory): Title and Citation (e.g. Jones v. Smith, 123 F.3d 456 (11th Cir. 2004)) Type of Action (e.g. civil suit for money damages for violation of free speech rights under the First Amendment.) Facts of the Case (Discuss relevant facts; what happened? Why is this matter in court?) Contentions of the Parties (What are the best arguments favoring each party?) Issue(s) (The issue relevant to the subjects studied in the module in which it is assigned, e.g. Were Jones’ rights under the First Amendment violated when he was fired for speaking at a political rally?) Decision (How did the court rule on that issue?) Reasoning (Why did the court rule the way it did? This is the most important part of the case.) Rule of Law (What one legal point do we take from this case?) Length: Should not exceed 2 pages. Case briefs grades are weighted as follows (total 4 points):Summary of facts: 1 pointFormat: 1 pointClarity of writing: 1 pointUnderstanding of the court’s decision: 1 point
case_brief_guidelines.doc
Unformatted Attachment Preview
CRJ 550
Legal Issues in Criminal Justice Administration
Case Brief Guidelines
1. Students will brief all assigned cases for the module in which they are assigned. The case briefs
are to be the student’s own work.
2. Case briefs will be written in the following format (mandatory):
a. Title and Citation (e.g. Jones v. Smith, 123 F.3d 456 (11th Cir. 2004))
b. Type of Action (e.g. civil suit for money damages for violation of free speech rights
under the First Amendment.)
c.
Facts of the Case (Discuss relevant facts; what happened? Why is this matter in court?)
d. Contentions of the Parties (What are the best arguments favoring each party?)
• Smith argues that:
• Jones argues that:
e. Issue(s) (The issue relevant to the subjects studied in the module in which it is assigned,
e.g. Were Jones’ rights under the First Amendment violated when he was fired for
speaking at a political rally?)
f.
Decision (How did the court rule on that issue?)
g. Reasoning (Why did the court rule the way it did? This is the most important part of the
case.)
h. Rule of Law (What one legal point do we take from this case?)
3. Length: Should not exceed 2 pages.
4. Case briefs grades are weighted as follows (total 4 points):
a. Summary of facts: 1 point
b. Format: 1 point
c. Clarity of writing: 1 point
d. Understanding of the court’s decision: 1 point
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more