Expert answer:Ethics of Purchasing Study Materials Online Caroly

Solved by verified expert:Write a one page , single spaced , see the requirement on the files that I have attached,thank you
ethics_essay_assignment.pdf

ethics_essay_assignment_2.pdf

essay_assignment_3.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Ethics Assignment
Due Sunday, November 5 at 11:45 p.m.
Required
Read the case study, “Carolyn’s Dilemma,” and write a one-page, single-spaced essay that
answers the questions at the end of the case in the context of the essay.
Expository Essays
The type of essay you will be writing is often referred to as an expository essay. One of the key
elements of expository essays is conciseness. This essay is limited to one page in length. I will
stop reading after one page, so only include what really needs to be said. Do not attempt to
circumvent this requirement by using narrow margins, small fonts, etc. One-inch margins are
required, and a standard font (such as Times New Roman 12) must be used. Make sure your line
spacing is single space with no additional spacing between lines. Skip a line between paragraphs.
Please note that you must submit an essay that answers the questions at the end of the case, not a
list of answers to the questions.
Purdue OWL provides a good resource for writing these essays. Their section on expository
essays (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/02/) explains some of the important parts
of this type of essay. I also recommend looking over the sections on “Conciseness” on the left
side of the page. These resources can help if you find yourself having difficulty keeping your
essay to one page.
Another excellent resource is the Saunders Writing Center in 323 Plant Hall. You can get more
information about the center, including its hours, at http://www.ut.edu/academicsupport/saunders/.
Submission Instructions
Your document must be saved as a Microsoft Word file (“.doc” or “.docx”) that is named
lastname.docx. For example, I would name my submission Shirley.docx. You must submit your
completed assignment to both “Ethics Assignment” links on the Blackboard site for our
course no later than 11:45 p.m. on Sunday, November 5. I will not grade late assignments
under any circumstances.
This is an individual assignment. I will use Turnitin.com to check the originality of your
submission. Failure to do your own work or to protect your document from others is a violation
of the University of Tampa’s Academic Integrity Policy.
Questions
1. Identify and briefly explain three negative consequences Carolyn might face by
purchasing the resources from an online auction or some source other than the original
vendor. Which one do you think would be the most negative and why?
2. Explain why you think it would be justifiable for Carolyn to purchase the materials from
an online auction or other source.
3. Other than Carolyn, Becker, and other sellers, identify three stakeholders who would be
impacted by the decision that Carolyn makes, and explain how each of these stakeholders
would be affected.
Grading Rubric for Evaluating the Ethics Assignment (35 points)
Does not meet
expectations
• Correctly identified
three negative
consequences but
provided no
explanation, or
• Provided one or
two correct
consequences with
satisfactory
explanation.
(4 – 5 points)
Provided a weak or
incorrect explanation
of which
consequence was the
most negative and
why.
(2 – 2.5 points)
Topics
Question One
(A):
Consequences of
purchasing from
online auctions
or other sources
(8 points)
Did not complete
Did not provide an
answer, or provided
an answer with no
explanation.
(0 points)
Question One
(B): Most
negative
consequence of
purchasing from
online auctions
or other sources
(4 points)
Question Two:
Justifications for
purchasing from
online auctions
or other sources
(6 points)
Did not identify
which consequence
was the most
negative.
(0 points)
Did not consider why
it might be justifiable
to purchase resources
from other sources.
(0 points)
Provided a
justification that was
either weak or
incorrect.
(3 – 4 points)
Question Three:
Identify three
stakeholders and
explain impacts
on them
(9 points)
Did not correctly
identify any
stakeholders.
(0 points)
Grammar and
Spelling
(5 points)
Essay had more than
five spelling or
grammatical errors
that significantly
detracted from
content.
(0 points)
The essay was longer
than one page, and
questions were not
answered in the
context of the essay.
(0 points)
• Correctly identified
one stakeholder and
the impact the
decision would
have, or
• Correctly identified
two or three
stakeholders but did
not identify the
impacts.
(5 – 6 points)
Essay had three to
five spelling or
grammatical errors
that detracted from
the content.
(2.5 – 3 points)
Organization and
Mechanics
(3 points)
• The essay was
longer than one
page, or
• Questions were not
answered in the
context of the
essay.
(1 – 2 points)
Meets Expectations
Correctly identified
three negative
consequences of
purchasing from
other sources and
provided moderately
persuasive
explanations of why
they would be
negative.
(6 – 7 points)
Provided a
satisfactory
explanation of which
consequence was the
most negative and
why.
(3 – 3.5 points)
Provided moderately
persuasive
justifications for
Carolyn to purchase
the resources from
other sources.
(4.5 – 5 points)
• Correctly identified
two stakeholders
and the impact the
decision would
have on them, or
• Correctly identified
three stakeholders
but did not
correctly identify
all the impacts.
(7 – 8 points)
Essay had one or two
spelling or
grammatical errors
that did not
significantly detract
from the content.
(4 – 4.5 points)
The essay conformed
to the one-page limit,
and questions were
answered in the
context of the essay.
(3 points)
Exceeds
Expectations
Correctly identified
three negative
consequences of
purchasing from
other sources and
provided strong
explanations of why
they would be
negative.
(8 points)
Provided a strong
explanation of which
consequence was the
most negative and
why.
(4 points)
Provided strongly
persuasive
justifications for
Carolyn to purchase
the resources from
other sources.
(6 points)
Correctly identified
three stakeholders
and the impact
Carolyn’s decision
would have on them.
(9 points)
No grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors.
(5 points)
Ethics Assignment
Due Sunday, November 5 at 11:45 p.m.
Required
Read the case study, “Carolyn’s Dilemma,” and write a one-page, single-spaced essay that
answers the questions at the end of the case in the context of the essay.
Expository Essays
The type of essay you will be writing is often referred to as an expository essay. One of the key
elements of expository essays is conciseness. This essay is limited to one page in length. I will
stop reading after one page, so only include what really needs to be said. Do not attempt to
circumvent this requirement by using narrow margins, small fonts, etc. One-inch margins are
required, and a standard font (such as Times New Roman 12) must be used. Make sure your line
spacing is single space with no additional spacing between lines. Skip a line between paragraphs.
Please note that you must submit an essay that answers the questions at the end of the case, not a
list of answers to the questions.
Purdue OWL provides a good resource for writing these essays. Their section on expository
essays (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/02/) explains some of the important parts
of this type of essay. I also recommend looking over the sections on “Conciseness” on the left
side of the page. These resources can help if you find yourself having difficulty keeping your
essay to one page.
Another excellent resource is the Saunders Writing Center in 323 Plant Hall. You can get more
information about the center, including its hours, at http://www.ut.edu/academicsupport/saunders/.
Submission Instructions
Your document must be saved as a Microsoft Word file (“.doc” or “.docx”) that is named
lastname.docx. For example, I would name my submission Shirley.docx. You must submit your
completed assignment to both “Ethics Assignment” links on the Blackboard site for our
course no later than 11:45 p.m. on Sunday, November 5. I will not grade late assignments
under any circumstances.
This is an individual assignment. I will use Turnitin.com to check the originality of your
submission. Failure to do your own work or to protect your document from others is a violation
of the University of Tampa’s Academic Integrity Policy.
Questions
1. Identify and briefly explain three negative consequences Carolyn might face by
purchasing the resources from an online auction or some source other than the original
vendor. Which one do you think would be the most negative and why?
2. Explain why you think it would be justifiable for Carolyn to purchase the materials from
an online auction or other source.
3. Other than Carolyn, Becker, and other sellers, identify three stakeholders who would be
impacted by the decision that Carolyn makes, and explain how each of these stakeholders
would be affected.
Grading Rubric for Evaluating the Ethics Assignment (35 points)
Does not meet
expectations
• Correctly identified
three negative
consequences but
provided no
explanation, or
• Provided one or
two correct
consequences with
satisfactory
explanation.
(4 – 5 points)
Provided a weak or
incorrect explanation
of which
consequence was the
most negative and
why.
(2 – 2.5 points)
Topics
Question One
(A):
Consequences of
purchasing from
online auctions
or other sources
(8 points)
Did not complete
Did not provide an
answer, or provided
an answer with no
explanation.
(0 points)
Question One
(B): Most
negative
consequence of
purchasing from
online auctions
or other sources
(4 points)
Question Two:
Justifications for
purchasing from
online auctions
or other sources
(6 points)
Did not identify
which consequence
was the most
negative.
(0 points)
Did not consider why
it might be justifiable
to purchase resources
from other sources.
(0 points)
Provided a
justification that was
either weak or
incorrect.
(3 – 4 points)
Question Three:
Identify three
stakeholders and
explain impacts
on them
(9 points)
Did not correctly
identify any
stakeholders.
(0 points)
Grammar and
Spelling
(5 points)
Essay had more than
five spelling or
grammatical errors
that significantly
detracted from
content.
(0 points)
The essay was longer
than one page, and
questions were not
answered in the
context of the essay.
(0 points)
• Correctly identified
one stakeholder and
the impact the
decision would
have, or
• Correctly identified
two or three
stakeholders but did
not identify the
impacts.
(5 – 6 points)
Essay had three to
five spelling or
grammatical errors
that detracted from
the content.
(2.5 – 3 points)
Organization and
Mechanics
(3 points)
• The essay was
longer than one
page, or
• Questions were not
answered in the
context of the
essay.
(1 – 2 points)
Meets Expectations
Correctly identified
three negative
consequences of
purchasing from
other sources and
provided moderately
persuasive
explanations of why
they would be
negative.
(6 – 7 points)
Provided a
satisfactory
explanation of which
consequence was the
most negative and
why.
(3 – 3.5 points)
Provided moderately
persuasive
justifications for
Carolyn to purchase
the resources from
other sources.
(4.5 – 5 points)
• Correctly identified
two stakeholders
and the impact the
decision would
have on them, or
• Correctly identified
three stakeholders
but did not
correctly identify
all the impacts.
(7 – 8 points)
Essay had one or two
spelling or
grammatical errors
that did not
significantly detract
from the content.
(4 – 4.5 points)
The essay conformed
to the one-page limit,
and questions were
answered in the
context of the essay.
(3 points)
Exceeds
Expectations
Correctly identified
three negative
consequences of
purchasing from
other sources and
provided strong
explanations of why
they would be
negative.
(8 points)
Provided a strong
explanation of which
consequence was the
most negative and
why.
(4 points)
Provided strongly
persuasive
justifications for
Carolyn to purchase
the resources from
other sources.
(6 points)
Correctly identified
three stakeholders
and the impact
Carolyn’s decision
would have on them.
(9 points)
No grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors.
(5 points)
Ethics Assignment
Due Sunday, November 5 at 11:45 p.m.
Required
Read the case study, “Carolyn’s Dilemma,” and write a one-page, single-spaced essay that
answers the questions at the end of the case in the context of the essay.
Expository Essays
The type of essay you will be writing is often referred to as an expository essay. One of the key
elements of expository essays is conciseness. This essay is limited to one page in length. I will
stop reading after one page, so only include what really needs to be said. Do not attempt to
circumvent this requirement by using narrow margins, small fonts, etc. One-inch margins are
required, and a standard font (such as Times New Roman 12) must be used. Make sure your line
spacing is single space with no additional spacing between lines. Skip a line between paragraphs.
Please note that you must submit an essay that answers the questions at the end of the case, not a
list of answers to the questions.
Purdue OWL provides a good resource for writing these essays. Their section on expository
essays (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/02/) explains some of the important parts
of this type of essay. I also recommend looking over the sections on “Conciseness” on the left
side of the page. These resources can help if you find yourself having difficulty keeping your
essay to one page.
Another excellent resource is the Saunders Writing Center in 323 Plant Hall. You can get more
information about the center, including its hours, at http://www.ut.edu/academicsupport/saunders/.
Submission Instructions
Your document must be saved as a Microsoft Word file (“.doc” or “.docx”) that is named
lastname.docx. For example, I would name my submission Shirley.docx. You must submit your
completed assignment to both “Ethics Assignment” links on the Blackboard site for our
course no later than 11:45 p.m. on Sunday, November 5. I will not grade late assignments
under any circumstances.
This is an individual assignment. I will use Turnitin.com to check the originality of your
submission. Failure to do your own work or to protect your document from others is a violation
of the University of Tampa’s Academic Integrity Policy.
Questions
1. Identify and briefly explain three negative consequences Carolyn might face by
purchasing the resources from an online auction or some source other than the original
vendor. Which one do you think would be the most negative and why?
2. Explain why you think it would be justifiable for Carolyn to purchase the materials from
an online auction or other source.
3. Other than Carolyn, Becker, and other sellers, identify three stakeholders who would be
impacted by the decision that Carolyn makes, and explain how each of these stakeholders
would be affected.
Grading Rubric for Evaluating the Ethics Assignment (35 points)
Does not meet
expectations
• Correctly identified
three negative
consequences but
provided no
explanation, or
• Provided one or
two correct
consequences with
satisfactory
explanation.
(4 – 5 points)
Provided a weak or
incorrect explanation
of which
consequence was the
most negative and
why.
(2 – 2.5 points)
Topics
Question One
(A):
Consequences of
purchasing from
online auctions
or other sources
(8 points)
Did not complete
Did not provide an
answer, or provided
an answer with no
explanation.
(0 points)
Question One
(B): Most
negative
consequence of
purchasing from
online auctions
or other sources
(4 points)
Question Two:
Justifications for
purchasing from
online auctions
or other sources
(6 points)
Did not identify
which consequence
was the most
negative.
(0 points)
Did not consider why
it might be justifiable
to purchase resources
from other sources.
(0 points)
Provided a
justification that was
either weak or
incorrect.
(3 – 4 points)
Question Three:
Identify three
stakeholders and
explain impacts
on them
(9 points)
Did not correctly
identify any
stakeholders.
(0 points)
Grammar and
Spelling
(5 points)
Essay had more than
five spelling or
grammatical errors
that significantly
detracted from
content.
(0 points)
The essay was longer
than one page, and
questions were not
answered in the
context of the essay.
(0 points)
• Correctly identified
one stakeholder and
the impact the
decision would
have, or
• Correctly identified
two or three
stakeholders but did
not identify the
impacts.
(5 – 6 points)
Essay had three to
five spelling or
grammatical errors
that detracted from
the content.
(2.5 – 3 points)
Organization and
Mechanics
(3 points)
• The essay was
longer than one
page, or
• Questions were not
answered in the
context of the
essay.
(1 – 2 points)
Meets Expectations
Correctly identified
three negative
consequences of
purchasing from
other sources and
provided moderately
persuasive
explanations of why
they would be
negative.
(6 – 7 points)
Provided a
satisfactory
explanation of which
consequence was the
most negative and
why.
(3 – 3.5 points)
Provided moderately
persuasive
justifications for
Carolyn to purchase
the resources from
other sources.
(4.5 – 5 points)
• Correctly identified
two stakeholders
and the impact the
decision would
have on them, or
• Correctly identified
three stakeholders
but did not
correctly identify
all the impacts.
(7 – 8 points)
Essay had one or two
spelling or
grammatical errors
that did not
significantly detract
from the content.
(4 – 4.5 points)
The essay conformed
to the one-page limit,
and questions were
answered in the
context of the essay.
(3 points)
Exceeds
Expectations
Correctly identified
three negative
consequences of
purchasing from
other sources and
provided strong
explanations of why
they would be
negative.
(8 points)
Provided a strong
explanation of which
consequence was the
most negative and
why.
(4 points)
Provided strongly
persuasive
justifications for
Carolyn to purchase
the resources from
other sources.
(6 points)
Correctly identified
three stakeholders
and the impact
Carolyn’s decision
would have on them.
(9 points)
No grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors.
(5 points)
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment

How it works

1. Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
2. Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions 
3. Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
4.  Download the paper after the writer uploads it 

Will the writer plagiarize my essay?

You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.

Is this service safe?

All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades