Solved by verified expert:reply to this discussion
df_6.txt
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1.
In comparing the moral principles that are presented by Reiman and Marquis their
arguments are significantly different, with no real similarity as previously
identified with Lach and Lee.�
Jeffrey Reiman, who is considered a liberal political philosopher, asserts that
abortion is permissible.� His arguments begin with his position on the valuation
of life. Reiman explains that for those who value the continuation of lives, it
would be morally wrong to kill an innocent child or adult.� He clarifies his
position with respect to abortion, that it is not immoral to end a life of what
is defined as a human zygote, embryo, fetus or even infant as a non-person
because they have not reached that stage of self-awareness where the valuation
of life cannot be justified. Reiman reports that whether you begin with the
human zygote or after birth, he reports that they do not have a moral status of
equality and right to life until sometime after birth. It is this belief that
supports his stand that abortions are not immoral
On the other end of the spectrum is Don Marquis.� Marquis is a conservative prolifer who asserts that killing another human being is wrong because it deprives
them of their future of value.� It is Marquis future of value belief that
questions the validity of Reiman. Marquis argues that someone can be mistaken
about what they will value in their future and we can learn to value new
things.� He indicates that intentional premature death is morally wrong because
it deprives a fetus of a future like ours. (Marquis, 2002)
Jeffrey Reiman, despite his advocacy that infants have no rights, is not in
favor of killing young children and in this respect only speaks that they have
no moral rights and would not advocate for us to follow his train of thought on
the valuation of one�s life.� However, he points out that no matter if one is
debating about abortion or anything else of moral matter, we are heavily
influenced by our emotions, affections and fears, which may distort peoples.�
Therefore, it is important that we resist these distortions and create
independently sensible concepts for why actions are right or wrong.
2.
Another tough assignment and question. Jeffrey Reiman believes abortion is
ethically permissible on the grounds that killing any offspring in only wrong
once is starts to care about life, which is after the first year. He believes
that since humans cannot account for asymmetric value that we only care about
our subjective selves. He believes that fetuses are not conscious or alive and
do not possess the property that gives us that asymmetric value and are not
entitled to special protection. Don Marquis does not believe abortion is ethical
but on the grounds of his future of value theory, which is a theory that all
life and everyone will have lives of value and includes all wrongness of
killing. Marquis makes his arguments by basically explaining what is wrong with
other anti abortion theories or perspectives like innocent human life
perspective or the pro attitude perspective while Reiman tried to argue on how
respecting and killing a fetus is right. They obviously sit on opposite sides in
this debate but for different reasons then one would think. I unfortunately
think both theorists are wrong on this topic and have flawed views. I don’t
think either affect any consequences when it comes to the debate of abortion.
For Reiman to even somehow ethically suggest that is okay to kill someone that
is less than a year old, is insane.�
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more