Solved by verified expert:Please choose a question from the essay requirement document attached. Must read the corresponding reading material to ANSWER that question, MUST BE FROM THE READING MATERIAL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH INDEED.IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THE QUESTION, PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHICH QUESTION YOU ARE CHOOSING AND I CAN SEND THE CORRESPONDING READINGS, THERE ARE LOTS OF THEM, I DON’T WANT TO MESS UP BY JUST UPLODAING ALL AT ONCE.
essay_requiement.docx
essay_requiement.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Essay Questions
Please choose ONE question from the list below and write a 1,500 word essay,
incorporating elements of the required/recommended readings and any other
relevant book chapters and journal articles (see the course outline for a selection of
good quality journals). The essay must follow the requirements listed on page 2 of
this document. It is to be written individually and shall make up 30% of your final
mark.
1. In what ways can “Human Relations School of Thought” can be
considered better compared to “Taylorism” perspective. In the light of
this, critically evaluate and discuss the advantages and disadvantages
of Taylor’s scientific management.
2. ‘A job will only be motivating if it leads to rewards that the individual
values’. Integrating two motivating theories discussed in the lecture,
please critically evaluate this statement.
3. Please compare and contrast any of the two leadership theories
discussed during the lecture. Which type of leadership style, do you
think, is appropriate and likely to be successful for today’s
organisations?
ESSAY SUBMISSION REQUIEMENT
4. 1. The essays must be in Microsoft Word and must be formatted in
Times New Roman 12, be double spaced, and have margins of at
least 2.54 cm on each side. Please use the APA style for your
referencing.
2. The essays must not exceed the stated word count of 1,500
words by any more than 10%. All body text, including footnotes or
endnotes, citations, and sub-titles are included in the word count.
Bibliography and appendices are excluded from the word count.
Tables, diagrams and other illustration are also excluded from the
word count but their number should not exceed two per paper, and
students are expected to provide detailed descriptions of the
illustrations in the main text of the essay (failing to justify the
purpose of the illustrations will be judged superfluous or
counterproductive). There is no required minimum word count.
Essay Marking criteria
80-100
Grade
Excellent/
Outstanding
Develops
convincing
and logical
argument
Structure
based on
excellent
linking of all
elements of
the essay.
Clarity of
Expression
Demonstrate
s
outstanding
analytical
ability, highlevel critical
thinking and
originality
with strong
focus.
Evidence of
deep
understandin
Understandin
g complex
g of the
concepts.
subject
Evidence of
thinking at
higher level.
Referencing
10%
60-69 Good
Pass
Develops
logical
argument.
Links aims,
objectives,
investigation,
findings and
conclusion.
Does not
follow
Generally very Good.
through
good.
More
arguments. Key themes
Some minor attention to
No clear
not clear.
inconsistencie conclusion
introduction
s.
required.
or
conclusion.
Excellent. No
Very good
technical
expression.
errors.
Meticulous
exploration
of literature.
Investigative Evidence of
work
strong
reading
outside
lecture.
Critical and
Analytical
thinking
70-79
Excellent
Flawless.
Very good
exploration of
literature.
Evidence of
reading
outside
lectures.
Fluent, clear.
Correct use of
terminology
and English.
Evidence of
good proof
reading.
Relevant
thorough
extensive and
up to date
literature.
Awareness of
limitations.
Logical,
Demonstrates
insightful and
insight in use
focused.
of detailed
Demonstrate
examples and
s ability to
theory with
analyse,
evidence of
synthesise
some critical
and creatively
thought.
apply
Provides a
knowledge
good
with a strong
evidenceevidencebased
based logical
conclusion.
conclusion.
Very clear
Clearly
and insightful identifies,
understandin defines and
g.
explains key
Demonstrate issues.
s originality
and creativity
All materials
in handling
the subject. relevant.
Very good.
Correctly cited
and listed.
50-59 Pass
40-49 Low 35-39
0-34 Fail
Pass
Borderline Fail
Disorganised
. Haphazard.
Difficult to
understand
Mostly
Some
Many points most points.
clearly
points
unclear.
Spelling,
expressed.
unclear.
Some misuse grammar
Few
Most words of words and and general
grammatical
correctly
grammatical English
or spelling
spelt.
errors present. usage needs
errors.
urgent
attention.
Just
sufficient
Good use of
use of
Limited use of
relevant
Use of only
relevant
relevant
books and
one or two
source
sources.
articles.
sources.
material but Some
Not aware
No relevant
fails to
irrelevant
of all
information.
demonstrat material.
limitations.
e broader
reading.
Reflective
stance on
some
Few
points.
attempts at Descriptive
Some
reflection, rather than
examples analysis, or evaluative.
utilised, but evaluation. Sweeping
None.
lacks
Examples generalisation
convincing are
s.
detail and descriptive Unsupported
not explored and lack
assertions.
consistently detail.
in relation to
theory.
Misses
Some
Identifies
some key irrelevant
most
points.
/repetitive
No evidence
issues.
Definitions material,
of
Provides
and
reasons for
understandin
clear
explanation inclusion not g basic
explanation s not
clear.
concepts.
s.
always
Misunderstand
clear.
s concepts.
Minor flaws Adequate
Poor and
and
but some
None.
incomplete.
omissions. omissions.
Essay Questions
Please choose ONE question from the list below and write a 1,500 word essay,
incorporating elements of the required/recommended readings and any other
relevant book chapters and journal articles (see the course outline for a selection of
good quality journals). The essay must follow the requirements listed on page 2 of
this document. It is to be written individually and shall make up 30% of your final
mark.
1. In what ways can “Human Relations School of Thought” can be
considered better compared to “Taylorism” perspective. In the light of
this, critically evaluate and discuss the advantages and disadvantages
of Taylor’s scientific management.
2. ‘A job will only be motivating if it leads to rewards that the individual
values’. Integrating two motivating theories discussed in the lecture,
please critically evaluate this statement.
3. Please compare and contrast any of the two leadership theories
discussed during the lecture. Which type of leadership style, do you
think, is appropriate and likely to be successful for today’s
organisations?
ESSAY SUBMISSION REQUIEMENT
4. 1. The essays must be in Microsoft Word and must be formatted in
Times New Roman 12, be double spaced, and have margins of at
least 2.54 cm on each side. Please use the APA style for your
referencing.
2. The essays must not exceed the stated word count of 1,500
words by any more than 10%. All body text, including footnotes or
endnotes, citations, and sub-titles are included in the word count.
Bibliography and appendices are excluded from the word count.
Tables, diagrams and other illustration are also excluded from the
word count but their number should not exceed two per paper, and
students are expected to provide detailed descriptions of the
illustrations in the main text of the essay (failing to justify the
purpose of the illustrations will be judged superfluous or
counterproductive). There is no required minimum word count.
Essay Marking criteria
80-100
Grade
Excellent/
Outstanding
Develops
convincing
and logical
argument
Structure
based on
excellent
linking of all
elements of
the essay.
Clarity of
Expression
Demonstrate
s
outstanding
analytical
ability, highlevel critical
thinking and
originality
with strong
focus.
Evidence of
deep
understandin
Understandin
g complex
g of the
concepts.
subject
Evidence of
thinking at
higher level.
Referencing
10%
60-69 Good
Pass
Develops
logical
argument.
Links aims,
objectives,
investigation,
findings and
conclusion.
Does not
follow
Generally very Good.
through
good.
More
arguments. Key themes
Some minor attention to
No clear
not clear.
inconsistencie conclusion
introduction
s.
required.
or
conclusion.
Excellent. No
Very good
technical
expression.
errors.
Meticulous
exploration
of literature.
Investigative Evidence of
work
strong
reading
outside
lecture.
Critical and
Analytical
thinking
70-79
Excellent
Flawless.
Very good
exploration of
literature.
Evidence of
reading
outside
lectures.
Fluent, clear.
Correct use of
terminology
and English.
Evidence of
good proof
reading.
Relevant
thorough
extensive and
up to date
literature.
Awareness of
limitations.
Logical,
Demonstrates
insightful and
insight in use
focused.
of detailed
Demonstrate
examples and
s ability to
theory with
analyse,
evidence of
synthesise
some critical
and creatively
thought.
apply
Provides a
knowledge
good
with a strong
evidenceevidencebased
based logical
conclusion.
conclusion.
Very clear
Clearly
and insightful identifies,
understandin defines and
g.
explains key
Demonstrate issues.
s originality
and creativity
All materials
in handling
the subject. relevant.
Very good.
Correctly cited
and listed.
50-59 Pass
40-49 Low 35-39
0-34 Fail
Pass
Borderline Fail
Disorganised
. Haphazard.
Difficult to
understand
Mostly
Some
Many points most points.
clearly
points
unclear.
Spelling,
expressed.
unclear.
Some misuse grammar
Few
Most words of words and and general
grammatical
correctly
grammatical English
or spelling
spelt.
errors present. usage needs
errors.
urgent
attention.
Just
sufficient
Good use of
use of
Limited use of
relevant
Use of only
relevant
relevant
books and
one or two
source
sources.
articles.
sources.
material but Some
Not aware
No relevant
fails to
irrelevant
of all
information.
demonstrat material.
limitations.
e broader
reading.
Reflective
stance on
some
Few
points.
attempts at Descriptive
Some
reflection, rather than
examples analysis, or evaluative.
utilised, but evaluation. Sweeping
None.
lacks
Examples generalisation
convincing are
s.
detail and descriptive Unsupported
not explored and lack
assertions.
consistently detail.
in relation to
theory.
Misses
Some
Identifies
some key irrelevant
most
points.
/repetitive
No evidence
issues.
Definitions material,
of
Provides
and
reasons for
understandin
clear
explanation inclusion not g basic
explanation s not
clear.
concepts.
s.
always
Misunderstand
clear.
s concepts.
Minor flaws Adequate
Poor and
and
but some
None.
incomplete.
omissions. omissions.
Problems you might have
Q1: Does it matter which referencing style is used?
A: As far as it is consistent; the use of APA or Harvard does not make a difference.
Q2: Can I use more than two theories for the question about motivation?
A: I suggest not to; but of course you can. Remember less is always more and more valuable
Q3: Can I pick up any of the theories from three categorisations concerning the topic of motivation?
A: Yes, you can. You do not have to limit your choice within one category of motivation theories (e.g.,
process theories).
Q4: What is the optimum number of articles to be used for coursework?
A: I would say something between 3-4.
Q5: Can I openly criticise Taylorism, using my own words?
A: Yes, you can. I would like to see your ideas and how you developed your own ideas.
Q6: How can I cite the content in lectures?
A: You can cite the book.
Q7: Do I have to write using a passive – tone? (ie., the thesis of this essay is…)
A: No; I would rather prefer to to see what you think. Please feel free to state your own argument (i.e.,
I think, I believe….)
Q8: Does the word count, 1, 500 words, for coursework include references and title?
A: The word count includes the title and content; but the not the references. So, 1,500 words includes
title and text; it excludes References section.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more