Expert answer:2-3 Page Paper – Assignment 2: Motivation and P
Solved by verified expert:Assignment 2: Motivation and Performance Management For this assignment, use the same company you researched in Assignment 1. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: Compare the difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Determine which is more strongly related to performance for your selected company.Apply motivational theory and performance management principles to evaluate the company as a potential employer.Use at least three (3) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Analyze motivational theories and their impact on work behavior and performance.Use technology to research issues affecting organizational behavior in order to deliver assignments which are clear, concise and have proper writing mechanics.Write clearly and concisely about operations management using proper writing mechanics. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Assignment 2: Motivation and Performance Management Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Determine how both job satisfaction and organizational commitment relate to employee performance at your selected company. Weight: 45% Did not submit or incompletely compared the difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Did not submit or incompletely determined which is more strongly related to performance for your selected company. Insufficiently compared the difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Insufficiently determined which is more strongly related to performance for your selected company. Partially compared the difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Partially determined which is more strongly related to performance for your selected company. Satisfactorily compared the difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Satisfactorily determined which is more strongly related to performance for your selected company. Thoroughly compared the difference between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Thoroughly determined which is more strongly related to performance for your selected company. 2. Evaluate your selected company in light of both motivational theory and performance management principles to determine if it is a place you would like to work. Weight: 35% Did not submit or incompletely evaluated your selected company in light of both motivational theory and performance management principles to determine if it is a place you would like to work. Insufficiently evaluated your selected company in light of both motivational theory and performance management principles to determine if it is a place you would like to work. Partially evaluated your selected company in light of both motivational theory and performance management principles to determine if it is a place you would like to work. Satisfactorily evaluated your selected company in light of both motivational theory and performance management principles to determine if it is a place you would like to work. Thoroughly evaluated your selected company in light of both motivational theory and performance management principles to determine if it is a place you would like to work. 3. Three (3) references Weight: 10% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present
s_mikeman_assignment1_what_makes________the_best_place_to_work_and_why_blank.docx
assignment1_what_makes________the_best_place_to_work_and_why_blank.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
Assignment 1: “What Makes ______ the Best Place to Work and Why?”
Student Name
Organizational Behavior
Professor Name
Date
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
2
Abstract
This paper discusses Google Inc’s driving forces and their organizational environment
that has enabled them to become the best place to work. It also addresses practices and policies
and innovations that have made Google remain a top company. Finally, it looks into the effects
of diversity in US companies and suggestions of how to tackle the issues.
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
3
If someone had to choose a company that they would wish to work for, probably a list of
companies would come into their minds. However, some companies stand out, and there is
hardly anybody who has never had about it. One example of such companies is Google Inc. One
of the dreams of most company owners is making sure that the names of their businesses are
known as far and wide as possible. Thus, what makes Google Inc the best place to work? This
paper considers the fundamental driving forces that influence the organizational environment of
Google. The article also examines the policies enacted by the company, considering the
influences that those practices have on the outcome of individuals and the organization. The
paper also finds the practices related to work attitudes in organizations in the US that are affected
by diversity.
One of the factors that can be attributed to the success of Google is the organizational
environment. The other reason that can be associated to their success is that the company has
been able to sell their brand globally. It can also be assumed that embracing a workforce that is
diverse, company’s ethics and their constant innovations have a played a significant role in
placing Google as a top company. By checking into the reasons that make Google stand out from
other businesses in the US, and how embracing diversity has influenced the company’s
achievement, we shall gain insights that might be of immense importance to entrepreneurs and
business minded people.
Considering a brief history of Google, the company was founded by two college friends
Larry Page and Sergey Brin as a research project. Page wanted to find a solution on how to find
out the web pages that link to a page. His main aim was to aid in the citation of works and
publishing of academic works. They initially made a search engine called Backrub and later
developed Google.com. The choice of the name Google was influenced by a mathematical term
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
4
‘googol’ a number that is represented by a one that is followed by 100 zeroes. This was to
indicate that the company aimed to sift through immense amounts of information on the web.
From the inspiration that was the name of the company, it is evident that one of the
company’s driving forces was to create a search engine that would sift through copious amounts
of information. Even with sifting through extensive knowledge is one of the driving forces,
another driving power could be the accuracy of the search results. By perfecting on those two
driving forces, Google posed to be the leading search engine in 1998. Google multiplied, and in
1999 it was undisputedly the best search engine. The rapid expansion of the company prompted
for the globalization of the company. The search engine was made available in 10 other
languages. The move of adding different languages was smart since the company had already
started going international. Currently, the company has its offices in more than 60 countries and
can translate more than 180 languages. With its offices in various countries, Google can meet the
needs of the people in different countries. This is because the company can engage its customers
on personal levels.
The fact that Google can translate over 180 languages shows that Google embraces
diversity. As indicated on the biography of the company’s culture, “We hire people who are
smart and determined, and we favor ability over experience. Although Googlers share common
goals and visions for the company, we hail from all walks of life and speak dozens of languages,
reflecting the global audience that we serve” (Google, 2015). While Google wants to reach as
many people as possible, the search results delivered by Google must also be of value and hold
meaning. Thus, Google esteems their users highly, when it comes to matters about moral
principles. A committee that deals with issues related to ethics ensure that lofty standards are
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
5
maintained as part the company’s obligation. The board also provides that malicious people do
not use Google to perpetuate offensive acts that violate the principles of morality.
Some of the innovative measures that have been taken by Google Inc include creating
algorithms that can determine the most suitable and relevant information during a search attempt.
It also ensures that the information displayed is not distasteful. Some other innovative milestones
that have enabled Google to stay on top include the Google Instant; that allows Google to add
real-time suggestions of queries being made. The main aim of Google’s innovations is to make
sure that the world’s information is organized and make it accessible as well as useful throughout
the whole world (Noviantoro, 2014).
Google has a work environment that can be said to be unique. The situation has attracted,
motivated, and it retains players who are the best in the field (Noviantoro, 2014). What keeps the
company always at the top are its specific practices and the influence that it has on its employees
individually and the organization. The company encourages its employees to cooperate, be agile
and take risks as well. The environment created at Google is usually motivating for its staff.
From free meal options to offering access to other facilities such as gyms, video games, showers,
children-care centers, and even doctors. The company provides maternity leaves of up to four
months and gifts $500 to the families that have newborns. There are also hatching rooms where
people exchange ideas during unwinding time. All these practices make Google a unique and
best place to work at and thus employees can work towards achieving the goals of the company
(Google, 2015).
While some companies have been successful at creating a workforce that is diverse and
working in harmony, many others have failed. As Patricia Kreitz says, the companies that
employ approaches that are one step such as ensuring that their employees attend training on
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
6
diversity are not very successful at creating changes that last. Furthermore, the difference can be
viewed from a broader perspective and not only about one’s gender, where they come from or
their race. Diversity is also about traits that are hidden within every person. For a company to
succeed, it must efficiently manage variety, communication, and resistance to change and
workplace policies implementation.
In conclusion, creating company policies helps a company to develop approaches that are
customized to the company’s operations. To build a unique and successful business, driving
forces must be identified and effective strategies and policies employed. A lot can be learned
from Google Inc from embracing diversity, innovativeness, and implementation of work policies
in a manner that has made them remain the best company to work for.
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
7
References:
Dyck, B., & Neubert, M. J. (2013). Management: Current practices and new directions. Boston,
MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Jeffs, C. (2017). Strategic management. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Rao, C. A., Rao, B. P., & Sivaramakrishna, K. (2015). Strategic management and business
policy: Texts and cases. New Delhi, India: Excel.
Stephenson, G., & Clark, P. (2013). Commercial and consumer law. London: Blackstone.
Wylie, K. (2016). SWOT Analysis of Cisco Systems, Inc. München: GRIN Verlag
GmbH.
1
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
Assignment 1: “What Makes ______ the Best Place to Work and Why?”
Student Name
Organizational Behavior
Professor Name
Date
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
2
Abstract
This paper discusses Google Inc’s driving forces and their organizational environment
that has enabled them to become the best place to work. It also addresses practices and policies
and innovations that have made Google remain a top company. Finally, it looks into the effects
of diversity in US companies and suggestions of how to tackle the issues.
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
3
If someone had to choose a company that they would wish to work for, probably a list of
companies would come into their minds. However, some companies stand out, and there is
hardly anybody who has never had about it. One example of such companies is Google Inc. One
of the dreams of most company owners is making sure that the names of their businesses are
known as far and wide as possible. Thus, what makes Google Inc the best place to work? This
paper considers the fundamental driving forces that influence the organizational environment of
Google. The article also examines the policies enacted by the company, considering the
influences that those practices have on the outcome of individuals and the organization. The
paper also finds the practices related to work attitudes in organizations in the US that are affected
by diversity.
One of the factors that can be attributed to the success of Google is the organizational
environment. The other reason that can be associated to their success is that the company has
been able to sell their brand globally. It can also be assumed that embracing a workforce that is
diverse, company’s ethics and their constant innovations have a played a significant role in
placing Google as a top company. By checking into the reasons that make Google stand out from
other businesses in the US, and how embracing diversity has influenced the company’s
achievement, we shall gain insights that might be of immense importance to entrepreneurs and
business minded people.
Considering a brief history of Google, the company was founded by two college friends
Larry Page and Sergey Brin as a research project. Page wanted to find a solution on how to find
out the web pages that link to a page. His main aim was to aid in the citation of works and
publishing of academic works. They initially made a search engine called Backrub and later
developed Google.com. The choice of the name Google was influenced by a mathematical term
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
4
‘googol’ a number that is represented by a one that is followed by 100 zeroes. This was to
indicate that the company aimed to sift through immense amounts of information on the web.
From the inspiration that was the name of the company, it is evident that one of the
company’s driving forces was to create a search engine that would sift through copious amounts
of information. Even with sifting through extensive knowledge is one of the driving forces,
another driving power could be the accuracy of the search results. By perfecting on those two
driving forces, Google posed to be the leading search engine in 1998. Google multiplied, and in
1999 it was undisputedly the best search engine. The rapid expansion of the company prompted
for the globalization of the company. The search engine was made available in 10 other
languages. The move of adding different languages was smart since the company had already
started going international. Currently, the company has its offices in more than 60 countries and
can translate more than 180 languages. With its offices in various countries, Google can meet the
needs of the people in different countries. This is because the company can engage its customers
on personal levels.
The fact that Google can translate over 180 languages shows that Google embraces
diversity. As indicated on the biography of the company’s culture, “We hire people who are
smart and determined, and we favor ability over experience. Although Googlers share common
goals and visions for the company, we hail from all walks of life and speak dozens of languages,
reflecting the global audience that we serve” (Google, 2015). While Google wants to reach as
many people as possible, the search results delivered by Google must also be of value and hold
meaning. Thus, Google esteems their users highly, when it comes to matters about moral
principles. A committee that deals with issues related to ethics ensure that lofty standards are
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
5
maintained as part the company’s obligation. The board also provides that malicious people do
not use Google to perpetuate offensive acts that violate the principles of morality.
Some of the innovative measures that have been taken by Google Inc include creating
algorithms that can determine the most suitable and relevant information during a search attempt.
It also ensures that the information displayed is not distasteful. Some other innovative milestones
that have enabled Google to stay on top include the Google Instant; that allows Google to add
real-time suggestions of queries being made. The main aim of Google’s innovations is to make
sure that the world’s information is organized and make it accessible as well as useful throughout
the whole world (Noviantoro, 2014).
Google has a work environment that can be said to be unique. The situation has attracted,
motivated, and it retains players who are the best in the field (Noviantoro, 2014). What keeps the
company always at the top are its specific practices and the influence that it has on its employees
individually and the organization. The company encourages its employees to cooperate, be agile
and take risks as well. The environment created at Google is usually motivating for its staff.
From free meal options to offering access to other facilities such as gyms, video games, showers,
children-care centers, and even doctors. The company provides maternity leaves of up to four
months and gifts $500 to the families that have newborns. There are also hatching rooms where
people exchange ideas during unwinding time. All these practices make Google a unique and
best place to work at and thus employees can work towards achieving the goals of the company
(Google, 2015).
While some companies have been successful at creating a workforce that is diverse and
working in harmony, many others have failed. As Patricia Kreitz says, the companies that
employ approaches that are one step such as ensuring that their employees attend training on
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
6
diversity are not very successful at creating changes that last. Furthermore, the difference can be
viewed from a broader perspective and not only about one’s gender, where they come from or
their race. Diversity is also about traits that are hidden within every person. For a company to
succeed, it must efficiently manage variety, communication, and resistance to change and
workplace policies implementation.
In conclusion, creating company policies helps a company to develop approaches that are
customized to the company’s operations. To build a unique and successful business, driving
forces must be identified and effective strategies and policies employed. A lot can be learned
from Google Inc from embracing diversity, innovativeness, and implementation of work policies
in a manner that has made them remain the best company to work for.
Running head: BEST PLACE TO WORK
7
References:
Dyck, B., & Neubert, M. J. (2013). Management: Current practices and new directions. Boston,
MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Jeffs, C. (2017). Strategic management. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Rao, C. A., Rao, B. P., & Sivaramakrishna, K. (2015). Strategic management and business
policy: Texts and cases. New Delhi, India: Excel.
Stephenson, G., & Clark, P. (2013). Commercial and consumer law. London: Blackstone.
Wylie, K. (2016). SWOT Analysis of Cisco Systems, Inc. München: GRIN Verlag
GmbH.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades