Solved by verified expert:read the attchemnts and answer the question each answer should be 2 sentence ,1- What are your biggest concerns about the prospects for this business? 2- Select Does Troika Potato Chips look like an attractive investment opportunity? Why or why not? 3- Select If additional information should precede the decision to invest, what is that information and where should he obtain it?
troika_potato_chips__a____russia_artical__1_.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Troika Potato Chips (A)1
St. Petersburg, Russia
J
ohn M irren drummed his fingers impatiently on the
dashboard as he sat in the usual M osco w tra ffic
jam. He w as a managing director o f a Britisho w n e d, M osco w-b ase d invest me n t f u n d t h a t ma d e
investments in various businesses throughout Russia.
John sa w many business plans, written w ith various
degrees o f competence, every w eek, and he had to
decide w hich ones w arranted f urther investigation. As
part o f his job, he visited companies that seemed especially promising.
John le f t his job at a London investment boutique in
1990 to take a job in Russia at a time w hen Russia w as
considered the land o f unlimited opportunity. He had a
background in the region because he studied Russian
history, literature, and language in university and had
spent a year in St. Petersburg writing his senior thesis.
As managing director o f the investment f und, he had
been extensively involved in evaluating and managing
many projects, a f e w o f w hich turned out to be spectacular successes, but many o f them barely broke even
and some w ere complete f ailures.
That w eek he w as considering several plans. There w as
a f urniture f actory in Novosibirsk that w as making good
quality copies o f Russian Empire f urniture, as w ell as
more modern f urniture, and it needed investment
money to expand operations. A n interesting proposal
— to open a f ast f ood restaurant in Yekatrinburg —
had come into the o ffice last w eek. That seemed very
promising since the potential manager had considerable restaurant experience, both domestic and international. There w as also a proposal to open sorely needed
self-service laundries in M osco w. Ho w ever, that propos-
36
al needed care f ul examination since they w ere asking
f or a considerable sum o f money.
A m ore m o d est b usin ess pla n h a d co me fro m St.
Petersburg. Three diff erent legal entities with experience and expertise in diff erent fields had joined together to propose a company to produce and sell potato
chips to the St. Petersburg market.
T he f ormal business plan f or this proposed startup f ollo ws. John had to decide if the business w arranted his
investment, given all he had learned about investing in
Russia (see A ppendix).
Business Plan2
Summary
T
he proposed project envisions the establishment
o f a ne w enterprise that will produce high-quality, co m p e titively-price d p o t a t o chips in t h e
to w n o f Komarovo, not f ar from St. Petersburg. 3 The
initiators have f ormed a separate legal entity called
“ Troika ” specifically f or the purpose o f realizing the
project. Th e p o t a t o chips w ill b e sold u n d er t h e
“ Troika ” brand name.
The initiators hope to attract an outside equity investor
and use the invested f unds to purchase specialized,
high-quality, imported processing equipment that will
enable them to produce and package w orld-class potato chips to be sold through both w holesalers and retailers in the Leningrad O blast (region).
The preparatory stage has been completed, and practically all key aspects have been w orked out by the ini-
TROIKA POTATO CHIPS (A)
tiators. The enterprise has acquired a production site
(building and land) and a specialized potato storage
f acility. W ith the purchase and installation o f processing
equipment, and a complete renovation o f the production site, production can begin. A preliminary agreement to purchase equipment has been reached with a
Dutch firm considered a leading producer o f f ood processing equipment.
The principal ra w ingredient, potatoes, w ill be supplied
by the agricultural consortium Komarovo w hich is one
o f the f ounding partners in Troika.
The financial requirements f or the realization o f the
above project are as f ollo ws: an equity investment o f
$803,600 f or the purchase o f production equipment,
and a short-term credit o f $236,000 f or startup capital.
The time frame f or the realization o f the project is 10.5
years. The expected net pro fit at the end o f this period
is $2,269,000. Pro fits w ill be reinvested to modernize or
expand existing operations or used to start a ne w venture.
The Enterprise
GENERAL INF ORM ATIO N
Troika is registered as a closed joint-stock company in
the to w n o f Komarovo, Leningrad O blast. 4 The venture’s principal activity is the processing o f agricultural
products, specifically, the production o f potato chips.
Troika’s f ounding partners are three independently regist ere d org a niz a tio ns. Th e first is t h e a gricult ural
Consortium “ Komarovo, ” a closed joint-stock company
w hich w as a state-o w ned f arm until 1994. Komarovo
o w ns 11,500 hectares o f f arm land, and it is the largest
producer o f potatoes in Russia’s north w estern region.
The second is “Baikal, ” a joint-stock company f ormed in
1995 by a group o f producers, w holesalers, and retailers
o f f ood products. 5 Together, Baikal’s shareholders make
u p a d evelo p e d distrib u tio n n e t w ork coverin g St.
Petersburg and the surrounding region. The last is
“ Znamya, ” also a closed joint-stock company w hose
principal activity is processing agricultural products.
Baikal – access to a distribution net w ork coverin g t h e CIS, co n trib u tio n valu e d a t
40,000,000 rubles;
Znamya – potato storage f acility valued at
20,000,000 rubles.
The initiators agreed that Baikal w ould withhold its
cash contribution o f 40 million rubles until the purchase
and installation o f production equipment. Thus, as o f
July 1, 1995, 60 out o f 100 shares o f common stock w ere
paid f or in f ull.
APPRAISING M ARKET VALUE O F
STOCKH OLDERS’ EQ UITY
Since Troika is a ne wly created enterprise, it has not
incurred any debt or losses. The fixed assets o w ned by
the company are as f ollo ws:
land
building
potato storage f acility
1.5 hectare
420 sq. meters
480 sq. meters
In ord er t o minimiz e t axes, t h e Fo u n din g Ch art er
assigns to assets the lo w est possible value allo w ed by
Russian la w. The actual market value o f these assets is
significantly higher. 6 For example, the cost o f property
in the area is bet w een $10,000 and $15,000 per hectare.
The cost o f constructing a similar building is $84,000,
and the storage f acility has been appraised at $60,000.
Thus, the actual market value o f Troika’s fixed assets is
approximately $159,000 but that w ould fluctuate as the
political and economic climate in Russia changes.
DECISIO N M A KING
Regular shareholder meetings are to be held t wice a year.
A dditional meetings can be initiated by a shareholder
holding a minimum of 25% of common (voting) shares.
Decisions can be approved provided shareholders holding
a minimum of 50% of voting shares are present. Critical
decisions, such as changing the Charter, re-organization,
and liquidation of assets, require a 75% presence.
Troik a w ill b e m a n a g e d by a Bo ard o f Direct ors,
appointed by shareholders, with A lexander I. Ivanov
serving as chairman.
CO NTRIBUTED CAPITAL
PRO FIT SH ARING
As o f July 1, 1995, st ock h old ers’ e q uity t o t als
100,000,000 rubles [US$1 = 5,000 rubles at that time].
There are 100 shares o f common stock, each w ith a
n o min al valu e o f 1,000,000 ru bles. K o m arovo a n d
Baikal each o w n 40 % o f the shares, and the remaining
20 % is held by Znamya.
Net pro fits w ill be distributed among shareholders as
dividends. The dividends are to be approved at general
shareholder meetings.
Th e f o u n d ers o f Troik a co n trib u t e d t h e f ollo w in g
assets, in lieu o f cash, f or shares in the enterprise:
Komarovo – building and land to be used f or production, valued at 40,000,000 rubles;
The Product
Troika potato chips w ill be produced and packaged
with equipment manu f actured by a Dutch firm, Florigio
Industrie, using only natural, high-quality ingredients.
The principal ra w ingredient is potatoes, not the customary processed potato concentrate, so as to give the
finished product a more natural potato taste and smell.
37
CASE STUDIES
Florigio Industrie is a leading producer o f f ood-processing technology. This technology will enable Troika to
produce both regular chips and flavored chips up to the
highest w orld standards. The chips will be packaged in
100 gram plastic packets bearing the company logo.
Highest quality packaging materials (also Dutch) w ill be
used, ensuring the chips remain fresh f or up to six
months. Package labeling w ill be in Russian.
Since potato chips are neither a staple nor a luxury
product, demand is determined by price and quality.
Troika chips will be cheaper than imported brands and
o f higher quality than domestic brands, so it is expected that they will be very popular.
Analysis of Market and Competition
Potato chips w ere produced locally in the 1960s and
1970s, t h e n disco n tin u e d u n til 1992. Local m ark e t
research indicates that the product currently enjoys a
90 % a w areness among the population.
In St. Petersburg, Western-style supermarkets selling
brand name, imported products carry the w idest assortment o f potato chips. These supermarkets cater to consumers with high purchasing po w er. Potato chips are
also available in f ood stores selling primarily Russian
products and in 10 to 15 % o f all kiosks. 7 These stores
o ff er a narro w er range o f products and usually carry no
more than t w o brands o f potato chips.
M arket research sho ws that about 60 % o f the local
population consumes potato chips with some regularity. A large segment o f potato chip consumers is aged
bet w een 5 and 18. A t the moment, the market has no
obvious leader.
Since market research indicates that potato chips are a
price elastic product in high demand, it could be concluded that expanding the consumer base by lo w ering
the price w ould greatly increase sales. A consumer survey conducted by the St. Petersburg State University
Economics Department con firms this f act, sho wing that
90 % o f potential buyers o f potato chips re frain from
buying due to high price. The remaining 10 % choose
not to buy because o f perceived lo w quality or f or some
other reason. The survey also f ound that lo w ering the
price o f potato chips by 30 % makes them a ff ordable to
20-30 % o f potential consumers, compared to the 10 %
potential buyers w ho can a ff ord to buy them at today’s
prices.
Troika’s main competitors are f oreign producers, f ollo w ed by domestic producers. Domestic competition is
not likely to become a f actor f or at least 3 to 4 years.
Presently, the region is supplied by Finnish, Dutch,
Isra eli, a n d A m erica n pro d ucers. Re t ail prices f or
imported potato chips sold in elite supermarkets are
bet w een $.95 and $1.65 per 100 g package, making
38
them a ff ordable to only 7-10 % o f the population.
O ther stores sell chips at comparatively lo w er prices,
from $.75 to $.90 per 100 g. These chips are produced
by Russian, Baltic, and Polish companies.
Some w idely distributed brands o f potato chips and
their prices per 100 g package are as f ollo ws:
SUPER
(Holland)
$1.12 to $1.52
SPECIAL SN ACKS
(M osco w)
$ .56
MINI SN ACK
(Israel)
$1.43
RA FFLES
(Poland)
$1.74
Koloss, another major domestic brand, is also relatively
inexpensive. Due to a number o f f actors, primarily high
tariffs, retail prices o f imported chips are kept relatively high. Thus, only a limited number local w holesalers
can a ff ord to purchase potato chips from abroad. In
f act, a survey o f the w holesale market sho w ed that
imported potato chips are distributed by only three o f
the 15 largest w holesalers o f f ood products in the area.
O f the 20 largest supermarkets in St. Petersburg, only
f our sell potato chips. These figures demonstrate that
choice and availability o f potato chips in St. Petersburg
and the surrounding area is limited.
A t the moment, no local producers o f potato chips use
imported, high-quality equipment. In general, the simple, lo w-tech processes employed by these companies
make them incapable o f producing on a mass scale.
Furthermore, the packaging o f local chips is not consistent w ith w orld standards.
A care f ul pricing strategy, a high quality product, and
good packaging w ill enable Troika to successf ully compete w ith local as w ell as f oreign producers. Troika chips
will diff er from imports in price (30-40 % cheaper), and
from domestic substitutes in quality and packaging.
Until more local mass-producers o f potato chips enter
the market, w hich is not likely to occur f or the next
three to f our years, the demand f or the product w ill
remain unsatisfied. By the time equilibrium is reached,
Troika is expected to have gained a 5 % share o f the
local market, producing and selling 289 tons o f chips
per year.
In summary, the market situation can be characterized
as f ollo ws:
absence o f a clear market leader
limited choice and availability o f high quality potato
chips
high price elasticity f or the product
slo wly but steadily increasing demand
increased domestic competition in the next three to
f our years
TROIKA POTATO CHIPS (A)
Marketing and Pricing Strategy
develop strategy and manage all marketing e ff orts.
The marketing plan consists o f three general components: (1) pricing strategy, (2) advertising campaign,
and (3) continuous analysis o f the changing market situation and integration o f ne w in f ormation into overall
strategy.
It is estimated that within the first t w o years o f the project, the cost o f advertising will reach approximately
$15,000 annually. As local competitors enter the market, advertising expenditures will be increased and the
advertising strategy will be modified accordingly. A t
this stage, advertising w ill become more aggressive,
f ocusing on maintaining market position as w ell as on
attracting buyers o f other brands. A dvertisements on
local radio and television will be added at this time. By
the third year, advertising expenditures are expected to
increase to about $25,000 annually.
The product’s competitive advantage is based on its:
• high quality
• image (modern, eye-catching package design)
• lo w production cost (use o f locally gro w n
potatoes)
• being ahead o f domestic competition
Since m ark e t rese arch sh o ws t h ere is u n m e t local
demand, Troika chips will be marketed initially in the St.
Petersburg region using Baikal’s distribution net w ork o f
over 400 selling points. W hen the local market is saturated, other regions w ill be explored.
Troika has obtained all necessary licenses, including certification from the M inistry o f A griculture, to produce
and sell its products.
Organization of the Production
Process
In the first five years, gro w th in sales will be based on
the expansion o f the consumer base rather than on the
elimination o f competition. Troika chips w ill be priced
on average 35 % cheaper than imports, and 10-20 %
ch e a p er t h a n d o m estic su bstit u t es, m a kin g t h e m
a ff ordable to a larger segment o f population.
The initiators have w orked out all key operational
aspects. A ll actions w ill be perf ormed according to the
schedule sho w n in Exhibit 1. The preparatory stage,
during w hich equipment w ill be installed, building renovated, and personnel trained, will last six months. Full
production capacity is expected to be reached f our
months a f ter the start o f production.
The minimum w holesale price o f $0.4125 allo ws retail
prices to be maintained at competitive levels. The use o f
local potatoes minimizes expenditures on the principal
ra w in gre die n t, since p o t a t o es su p plie d by o t h er
regions have a 10-15 % mark-up re flecting added transportation costs. Ra w material expenses (potatoes, oil,
spices, etc.) constitute 80 % o f total production costs
(Exhibit 6). Competitive pricing will allo w Troika to realize its sales objectives.
The production line requires a space measuring 200
square meters with a height o f 3 meters. W ith the completion o f renovation, w hich includes replacing electrical and w ater provision systems, the production site will
satisfy all technical requirements. Beyond housing the
production line, the building will contain an o ffice,
kitchen, bathrooms, and space f or storing packaging
materials. The site is easily accessible from a major highw ay.
Product image w ill play a significant role in attracting
potential buyers. The chips will be packaged in multicolor polypropylene packages that prominently display
the Troika brand name. The packaging will be modeled
a f ter Western standards both in quality and presentation and in guarantees o f freshness. In order not to
alienate Russian buyers, in f ormation and company logo
displayed on the package will be in Russian. 8 The product w eighs 100 g and will be distributed to retailers in
cardboard boxes.
A n agrarian specialist will be hired to ensure that the
potatoes purchased are o f the highest quality. To prevent rotting, the potatoes will be stored in a specially
adapted w arehouse. A permanent contract w ith the
potato supplier Komarovo is in e ff ect. The Consortium
o w ns 300 h ect ares o f f armla n d, e ach pro d ucin g
bet w een 16 and 18 tons o f potatoes per year. Vegetable
oil will be supplied by ARK O , a company located in a
city about 400 miles south o f St. Petersburg. The initiators o f Troika have close ties with this supplier as w ell.
The product w ill be promoted through a multi-stage
advertising campaign utilizing printed and electronic
media. The first stage o f the campaign w ill f ocus on
gaining maximum exposure and creating brand a w areness f or Troika potato chips. The product w ill be introduced with printed advertisements placed in buses,
metros, trains, and points o f purchase. Promotions will
be held at trade f airs, at local civic celebrations, and in
schools. A qualified marketing manager will be hired to
The production equipment supplied by the Dutch firm
Florigio comes w ith enough spare parts f or one year o f
operation. The choice o f Florigio as equipment supplier
is based on (1) its competitive price among imported
analogues, and (2) its higher quality compared to similar domestic equipment. The production line is capable
o f processing 400 kg o f potatoes per hour, resulting in
100 k g o f finish e d p o t a t o chips every h o ur.
A pproximately 5 % o f completed product is expected to
39
CASE STUDIES
be de f ective. Florigio w ould also supply packaging
materials that come imprinted w ith the company logo
and product in f ormation in Russian.
Production will go into recess during July and A ugust
w hen harvested potatoes are unsuitable f or potato
chips. The enterprise plans to hire a 22-person sta ff. The
technical personnel w ill undergo a training session conducted by Florigio experts w ho w ill remain t w o months
at the Troika production site. Training expense totals
$7,500 and is included in the budget. A ll equipment
maintenance w ork w ill be perf ormed by specialists
trained by Florigio.
Risk Factors
The f ollo wing list identifies some o f the risks f acing the
enterprise.
1. Hig h ra t e o f in fla tio n, co u ple d w it h fre q u e n t
changes in tax and licensing requirements, encumbers long-term financial planning and cost estimation.
stabilized, they are seeking an outside investor. This
investor will be o ff ered ne w ly issued stock in the enterprise. The total amount required o f the investor is
$837,100. The initiators w ill contribute $132,700.
Funds w ill be invested in the enterprise in the f ollo wing
order:
1. Baikal will contribute 40,000,000 as payment f or its
shares in the enterprise (40 shares at nominal price
o f 1,000,000 rubles). 9
2. Redistribution o f common shares: Komarovo and
Baikal will purchase 10 and 5 shares each, in that
order, from Znamya.
3. The second stock o ff ering will be organized, and an
equity in …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more