Solved by verified expert:two part assignment. book used in class Burns, C., Dunn, A., Brady, M., Starr, N. B., & Blosser, C. G. (2013). Pediatric primary care (5th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com
grading_detailed_discussion_rubric_nursing_assignmetn_weeks.docx
instructions_for_wk_nine_two_part_assignment.doc
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Nursing Detailed Discussion Rubric (10 week)
Objectives
Unacceptable
0 Points
Quality of Initial
Posting
Participation in
Discussion
Above Average (B Range)
Exemplary (A Range)
1 to 7 Points
8 Points
9 to 10 Points
No initial posting to
evaluate.
The information provided is
inaccurate, not focused on
the assignment’s topic,
and/or does not answer the
question(s) fully. Response
demonstrates incomplete
understanding of the topic
and/or inadequate
preparation.
The information provided is
accurate, displaying a good
understanding of the topic(s)
covered. A good
understanding is when you
are able to explain the terms
and topics covered. Initial
posting demonstrates sincere
reflection and addresses
most aspects of the
assignment, although all
concepts may not be fully
developed.
The information provided is
accurate, providing an in-depth,
well thought-out understanding
of the topic(s) covered. An indepth understanding provides
an analysis of the information,
synthesizing what is learned
from the course/assigned
readings. Course materials and
additional scholarly resources
are used to support important
points.
0 Points
1 to 3 Points
4 Points
5 Points
Displays an understanding of
the topic by responding to
two or more classmates’
initial posts but only on one
day of the week. Comments
may not be substantive,
meaning they reflect and
expand on what the other
student wrote or grounded in
evidence.
Displays an understanding of
the topic by responding to
two or more classmates’
initial posts on more than one
day (and to the instructors
comment if applicable).
Comments are substantive,
meaning they reflect and
expand on what the other
student wrote and are
grounded in evidence.
Displays an understanding of
the topic by responding to two
or more classmates’ initial
posts and to the instructor’s
comment (if applicable) on
more than two days.
Responses demonstrate an
analysis of peers’ comments,
building on previous posts.
Postings extend and deepen
meaningful conversation and
may include a follow-up
question. Postings are
grounded in evidence.
1 to 3 Points
4 Points
5 Points
No responses to other
classmates in this
discussion forum.
Writing Mechanics
(Spelling,
Grammar, APA)
and Information
Literacy
Satisfactory to Below
Satisfactory (F through C
Range)
0 Points
SU_Detailed Discussion Rubric (Nursing_10week)
Effective Date: September 4, 2014
Actual Possible
10
5
5
1|Page
No postings for which to
evaluate language and
grammar.
Some issues in any of the
following: grammar,
mechanics, spelling, use of
slang, and incomplete,
erroneous, or missing APA
citations and references.
Lacks appropriate references
to support response or
references may be on topic
but are dated or from nonappropriate sources.
Minor errors in grammar,
mechanics, or spelling in the
initial posting. Minor errors in
APA formatting (citations and
references) and APA style. If
required for the assignment,
utilizes sources to support
work for both the initial post
and some of the comments to
other students. Sources
include course and text
readings as well as outside
sources that are academic
and authoritative (e.g., journal
articles, other text books,
.gov websites, professional
organization websites).
COMMENTS: Place your substantive comments here including what went well (needs to
continue) as well as areas for improvement to achieve specified learning outcomes. It is
important to individualize feedback and to ensure coaching for improved achievement of
learning outcomes in future assignments. It is acceptable to place comments directly within
the rubric in the specific criteria area where additional coaching comments need to take
place.
SU_Detailed Discussion Rubric (Nursing_10week)
No errors in grammar,
mechanics, or spelling in both
the initial post and comments
to others. APA formatting is
correct. Postings demonstrate
a clear relationship to
evidence. Sources include
course and text readings as
well as outside sources that are
academic and authoritative
(e.g., journal articles, other text
books, .gov websites,
professional organization
websites).
Total
0
Late Deduction (if applicable)
0
Total Points
0
Effective Date: September 4, 2014
2|Page
20
20
Using your course and textbook readings and the University Online Library, perform research on the
following:
•
Assessment, diagnostic testing, and management of infectious conditions in a pediatric patient
•
Differential diagnoses for presentation of symptoms involving infectious diseases in pediatric
patients
After completing your research, consider this scenario:
An eighteen-month-old child, well-known to your practice, presents with a seven-day history of fever
ranging from 101 to 104.7 degrees Fahrenheit. On the fourth day of the fever, the emergency department
had performed the following tests:
•
A blood and urine culture
•
A complete blood count
•
A comprehensive metabolic panel
The culture reports were found to be negative.
Today, the vitals of the child are the following:
•
Temperature: 101.5 degrees Fahrenheit
•
Heart rate: 120 beats/minute
•
Respiratory rate: 20 breaths/minute
•
Blood pressure: 90/40
Physical examination of the child indicates the following positive findings:
•
Injected conjunctiva
•
Palmar redness
•
Magenta-colored lips
•
Red macula
•
Excoriating rashes in the diaper area
On the basis of the above information, respond to the following:
•
What will be your differential diagnoses for this patient?
•
What specific physical exam findings support these differential diagnoses?
•
Of the differential diagnoses you listed, which would be the most concerning?
•
What additional diagnostic tests will you recommend? Why?
•
What would be your focus for caregiver education?
Clarification for week assignment
Assignment 1: Discussion: Infectious Diseases in Children
When you have a child that presents to the office ill appearing, you must be careful to run
through various scenarios and differentials, examining all the data that you have thus far and
make a firm diagnosis. For this case study, make sure to LOOK at all of the data, both subjective
and objective, symptoms and lab results, from this information develop an appropriate list
of differentials that will fit the symptoms, then narrow down to a single diagnosis and give
supporting evidence. For your final diagnosis, you will need to list any additional diagnostics
or additional labs (if needed), treatment(s), referrals (if needed) follow-ups, as well as caregiver
education (what would you want to know as a parent if your child had this diagnosis).
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more