Expert answer:Monsanto-Syngenta Mega-Merger Would Drive More Dea
Answer & Explanation:Write a brief analysis to a case( 500 words long) and a 5 pages pptdiscuss whether your group wants to support or prevent the merger described in Monsanto-Syngenta Mega-Merger Would Drive More Deals: Real M&A. Discuss in the group the specific legal and practical bases for your argument in support or opposition to the merger.Here is link to this case : http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-01/monsanto-syngenta-mega-merger-would-drive-more-deals-real-m-aWe are against the merger.My part is : – Provides sound and rational bases upon which to conclude that mega-mergers should either be generally accepted or generally discouraged business practices. Just write about my part. Do not write about other parts.If you look at the Rubric table it says: “Articulates with precision the legal, practical, or ethical impact of mega-mergers”, so you should focus on answering this.Here is the rubric: mba610_module_seven_presentation_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf mba610_module_seven_presentation_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf
mba610_module_seven_presentation_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf
mba610_module_seven_presentation_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
MBA 610 Module Seven Presentation Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: In Module Six, you researched and discussed mega mergers, specifically the Monsanto-Syngenta merger. In Module Seven, your group will create a
presentation using PowerPoint (or another presentation software of your choice) that explains the specific legal and practical bases for your argument in support
or opposition to the merger.
When the project is completed, one member of your group must post your final presentation to the Module Seven Small Group Presentation discussion board
forum. The presentation must be submitted no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on Thursday of Module Seven.
In response to the other classmates’ presentations, each student must comment individually on at least one other group’s presentation and articulate a legal
counterargument to the group’s conclusion. In other words, if the group supports the merger, present legal precedent that could be used to defeat the merger. If
the group opposes the merger, identify laws or cogent arguments that might support the merger.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Defines mega-mergers and the legal criteria that must be satisfied in order for a merger to qualify as a mega-merger.
Compares and contrasts the benefits and detriments of mega-mergers by describing potential impacts on the companies involved, consumers, other
businesses, and the economy.
Provides sound and rational bases upon which to conclude that mega-mergers should either be generally accepted or generally discouraged business
practices.
Selects a minimum of two scholarly resources to support the conclusion drawn.
Individually responds to one other presentation and articulates a legal counterargument to the group’s conclusion. Uses legal precedent to defeat
group’s conclusion or identifies laws to support conclusion.
Guidelines for Submission: The presentation can be submitted in the format selected by the group using PowerPoint (or another presentation software of your
choice). The length of the presentation is determined by the group, but the presentation should have a minimum of two slides that comprehensively address
each critical element. All sources must be cited in APA format.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information,
review these instructions.
Rubric
Critical Elements
Defines MegaMergers
Proficient (100%)
Defines mega-mergers and the
legal criteria that must be
satisfied in order for a merger to
qualify as a mega-merger
Benefits and
Detriments
Compares and contrasts the
the benefits and detriments of
mega-mergers, including impacts
on the companies involved,
consumers, and the economy
Application of
Theory
Articulates with precision the
legal, practical, or ethical impact
of mega-mergers
References a minimum of two
scholarly articles to support the
students’ original application of
legal theory
Participates in group discussion
contributions input that provides
depth and detail to the
discussion.
Responds to one other group’s
presentation and articulates a
legal counterargument to the
group’s conclusion; uses legal
precedent to defeat group’s
conclusion or identifies laws to
support conclusion
Presentation has no errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization,
or contains minor errors that do
not affect the substantive
integrity of the presentation
Resources
Discussion:
Participation and
Contribution
Discussion: Legal
Counterargument
Articulation of
Response
Needs Improvement (75%)
Defines mega-mergers and the
legal criteria that must be
satisfied in order for a merger to
qualify as a mega-merger, but
lacks detail or clarity
Compares and contrasts the
the benefits and detriments of
mega-mergers, but does not
include the impacts on the
companies involved, consumers,
and the economy
Articulates generally the legal,
practical, or ethical impact of
mega-mergers
Not Evident (0%)
Does not define mega-mergers
and the legal criteria that must be
satisfied in order for a merger to
qualify as a mega-merger
Value
15
Does not compare and contrast
the benefits and detriments of
mega-mergers
15
Does not articulate the legal,
practical, or ethical impact of
mega-mergers
Does not reference a minimum of
two scholarly articles
15
Participates in group discussion
but contribution lacks depth and
detail
Did not participate in group
discussion
15
Responds to one other group’s
presentation and articulates a
legal counterargument to the
group’s conclusion, but does not
use legal precedent to defeat
group’s conclusion or identify
laws to support conclusion
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact readability
and articulation of main ideas
Does not responds to one other
group’s presentation
15
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
10
Total
15
100%
MBA 610 Module Seven Presentation Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: In Module Six, you researched and discussed mega mergers, specifically the Monsanto-Syngenta merger. In Module Seven, your group will create a
presentation using PowerPoint (or another presentation software of your choice) that explains the specific legal and practical bases for your argument in support
or opposition to the merger.
When the project is completed, one member of your group must post your final presentation to the Module Seven Small Group Presentation discussion board
forum. The presentation must be submitted no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on Thursday of Module Seven.
In response to the other classmates’ presentations, each student must comment individually on at least one other group’s presentation and articulate a legal
counterargument to the group’s conclusion. In other words, if the group supports the merger, present legal precedent that could be used to defeat the merger. If
the group opposes the merger, identify laws or cogent arguments that might support the merger.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Defines mega-mergers and the legal criteria that must be satisfied in order for a merger to qualify as a mega-merger.
Compares and contrasts the benefits and detriments of mega-mergers by describing potential impacts on the companies involved, consumers, other
businesses, and the economy.
Provides sound and rational bases upon which to conclude that mega-mergers should either be generally accepted or generally discouraged business
practices.
Selects a minimum of two scholarly resources to support the conclusion drawn.
Individually responds to one other presentation and articulates a legal counterargument to the group’s conclusion. Uses legal precedent to defeat
group’s conclusion or identifies laws to support conclusion.
Guidelines for Submission: The presentation can be submitted in the format selected by the group using PowerPoint (or another presentation software of your
choice). The length of the presentation is determined by the group, but the presentation should have a minimum of two slides that comprehensively address
each critical element. All sources must be cited in APA format.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information,
review these instructions.
Rubric
Critical Elements
Defines MegaMergers
Proficient (100%)
Defines mega-mergers and the
legal criteria that must be
satisfied in order for a merger to
qualify as a mega-merger
Benefits and
Detriments
Compares and contrasts the
the benefits and detriments of
mega-mergers, including impacts
on the companies involved,
consumers, and the economy
Application of
Theory
Articulates with precision the
legal, practical, or ethical impact
of mega-mergers
References a minimum of two
scholarly articles to support the
students’ original application of
legal theory
Participates in group discussion
contributions input that provides
depth and detail to the
discussion.
Responds to one other group’s
presentation and articulates a
legal counterargument to the
group’s conclusion; uses legal
precedent to defeat group’s
conclusion or identifies laws to
support conclusion
Presentation has no errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization,
or contains minor errors that do
not affect the substantive
integrity of the presentation
Resources
Discussion:
Participation and
Contribution
Discussion: Legal
Counterargument
Articulation of
Response
Needs Improvement (75%)
Defines mega-mergers and the
legal criteria that must be
satisfied in order for a merger to
qualify as a mega-merger, but
lacks detail or clarity
Compares and contrasts the
the benefits and detriments of
mega-mergers, but does not
include the impacts on the
companies involved, consumers,
and the economy
Articulates generally the legal,
practical, or ethical impact of
mega-mergers
Not Evident (0%)
Does not define mega-mergers
and the legal criteria that must be
satisfied in order for a merger to
qualify as a mega-merger
Value
15
Does not compare and contrast
the benefits and detriments of
mega-mergers
15
Does not articulate the legal,
practical, or ethical impact of
mega-mergers
Does not reference a minimum of
two scholarly articles
15
Participates in group discussion
but contribution lacks depth and
detail
Did not participate in group
discussion
15
Responds to one other group’s
presentation and articulates a
legal counterargument to the
group’s conclusion, but does not
use legal precedent to defeat
group’s conclusion or identify
laws to support conclusion
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact readability
and articulation of main ideas
Does not responds to one other
group’s presentation
15
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
10
Total
15
100%
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades