Expert answer:Business and finance help needed to write a paper
Answer & Explanation:FAS 201 Final Project Document.pdf
fas_201_final_project_document.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
FAS 201 Final Project: Analysis Paper Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The art history analysis paper will assess your knowledge of great works of Western art and culture and, in particular, your ability to think
critically and contextually about the arts. Through comparing and contrasting two pieces of art, you will evaluate how two works with similar
themes or subject matter can express very different styles, contexts, and cultural meanings. In the art history analysis paper, you will
communicate ideas regarding Western art and culture from antiquity through the Renaissance, using the specialized vocabulary explored within
the fine arts and humanities content learned throughout the course. While the primary goal of this paper is not research, you are strongly
encouraged to consult a few quality research sources to assist you in identifying your works and analyze their styles and historical contexts.
Please see the Module Resources folder for suggestions on which sources to consult.
This assessment will assess your mastery with respect to the following course outcomes:
Obtain knowledge of great works of Western art and culture (art, architecture, music)
Be able to analyze works of art in terms of subject matter and style
Be able to communicate ideas about art using the appropriate vocabulary in both written and oral formats
The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to incorporate feedback and ensure
quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Module Three and Module Five. The final submission will be submitted in
Module Seven.
You will select two different works of art from two different time periods or style movements from the ancient through the Renaissance periods.
The two works should have some common elements (such as subject matter, theme, or visual structure). Please include at least one image of
each work on the first page of your paper, before you start writing your introduction. If possible, provide multiple images of your chosen pieces
(from websites and online sources), with different angles or views. In the paper, you will address how the style, theme, and meanings of a work
of art relate to its various contexts (historical, social, political, philosophical, artistic, etc.). You will also examine the ways in which the style of an
artwork affects the way it looks; and address how each piece expresses the visual features, formal elements, and thematic concerns of its
particular style movement.
Recommended Resources:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
Philadelphia Museum of Art
National Gallery of Art , Washington, D.C.
The Louvre, Paris
The Prado Museum, Madrid
The Rijksmuseum , Amsterdam
The National Gallery, London
The British Museum, London
ARTstor Digital Library
Art History Research Guide
Getting Started with Research @ Shapiro Library
The following critical elements must be included and addressed:
Five Simple Steps
I.
Craft an introduction that gives your reader the WHAT and the WHY
a. What? What are you comparing? What are you contrasting? Your introduction will include information about both works,
indicating as fully as possible the following:
Identify the name of the artist and name or title of each of the works of art you have selected (keep in mind that these
pieces need to be from two different time or style periods covered in this course).
Identify the style movement or period of time and the closest date for each work of art selected for the analysis paper.
Identify the location and origin of the selected works of art you have chosen to analyze.
b. Why? Defend your chosen topic by explaining why the two pieces should be compared (in terms of their significance to the time
period, the cultural and historical context of the work(s), or the importance of the works to the development of art). What do
you hope your readers will gain through your comparison?
II.
Include a brief background and analysis of the works
In the body of your paper, as you compare and contrast the works, make sure to provide the following information for each work of art:
a. How does this work relate to its style movement and historical context?
b. How does the piece express the visual and thematic features of its style period?
c. Support your ideas with your objective observations on the work and what it reveals about the style movement and time period
in which it was created.
III.
Compare and contrast the works
a. Identify the visual similarities and differences between the two works.
b. Explain why they are important and how they relate to the style movements of the pieces. This section should expand and refine
what you included in your structured draft (Milestone Two). Your analysis should reflect further understanding of key course
concepts and language used in the analysis of art history and the humanities.
IV.
Include a brief reflection on your study of the humanities through your analysis
a. How does your analysis reflect your own study of the humanities? What did you learn about yourself, other cultures, and other
time periods through the study of these artistic artifacts?
b. How can the study of visual art, music, architecture, and other art forms help you in your own professional field or in your
personal life? What is the value of humanities to you?
V.
Sign off with a strong conclusion
Use your conclusion to revisit what you have illustrated throughout your paper about the significance of your analysis and make a strong
statement that emphasizes your main thesis and sums up your response to these two works.
Milestones
Milestone One: Topic Proposal
In task 3-3, you will submit your topic proposal. The first step in your final project process is to propose your paper topic. After looking through
the images in the MindEdge text and/or recommended resources, including the Web Gallery of Art, propose your topic, and post images of your
two proposed pieces. Please keep in mind that you need to select two works of visual art from two different time periods or style movements.
Lastly, your works must be selected from one of the style movements beginning with the ancient and ending with the Renaissance period. Once
you have fully identified the two pieces (the complete identifications of the works), you also need to justify your topic by explaining why the two
pieces should be compared. You may wish to consult the MindEdge resource on Writing About the Humanities, located in the Final Project
section of the course, in preparation for this and other milestones. This milestone is graded with the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric.
Milestone Two: Structured Draft
In task 5-3, you will submit a structured draft. The prompts for this essay will help you begin identifying, contextualizing, and comparatively
analyzing your two pieces of art. This essay is crucial to your success on the final paper because it will provide your instructor the opportunity to
give you detailed, constructive feedback on your preliminary ideas. The feedback and suggestions you receive on this essay can then be
incorporated into your final paper. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric.
Deliverable Milestones
Milestone
Deliverables
1
Topic Proposal
2
Structured Draft
Final Product: Analysis Paper
Module Due
Grading
Three
Graded separately; Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Five
Graded Separately; Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Seven
Graded separately; Final Project Document
Art History Analysis Paper Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Submissions should be 3 to 5 pages in length (approximately 700 to 1,500 words), not counting the title page, image
page, and list of works cited. Make sure the paper is double-spaced and uses 12-point type in a simple typeface such as Times New Roman or
Calibri. The paper should be written in MLA style. Any information taken from another source should indicate the author and page number in
parentheses, e.g., (MindEdge, 72), directly next to the information in the paper, and then the complete reference in the bibliography.
This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review
these instructions.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center.
Critical Elements
Introduction &
Identification
Exemplary (100%)
Accurately identifies both
works of art and presents
main idea behind selection of
these works with rich details
and appropriate research
sources
Proficient (85%)
Accurately identifies both
works of art and clearly
presents main idea behind
selection of these works with
some specific details
Needs Improvement (55%)
Identifies both works of art
with many accurate details
and offers main idea behind
selection of these works but
requires additional details to
support idea
Not Evident (0%)
Does not accurately or
sufficiently identify antiquity
to Renaissance and
Reformation visual works or
offer main idea behind
selection
Value
10
Background
Analysis
Meets “Proficient” criteria
and the information provided
is supported by appropriate
research and course-related
vocabulary
Historical background
information provided assists
the reader to interpret the
works of arts and suggests
how the information relates
to its context in terms of
subject matter. Describes
how the visual appearance of
the artwork reflects or
expresses the larger
qualities, elements, or
features of its particular style
movement
Comparison
Compares variety of aspects
between the two works in
rich detail to illustrate how
the works’ respective
historical, cultural, stylistic,
and/or philosophical
contexts are connected to
one another
Compares variety of aspects
between the two works to
illustrate how the works’
respective historical, cultural,
stylistic, and/or philosophical
contexts are connected to
one another
Historical background
information provided
insufficiently assists the
reader in interpreting the
works of art and/or
insufficiently identifies how
the information relates to its
context in terms of subject
matter. Partially describes
how the visual appearance of
the artwork reflects or
expresses the larger
qualities, elements, or
features of its particular style
movement
Some comparison exists
between the two works to
illustrate how the works’
respective historical, cultural,
stylistic, and/or philosophical
contexts are connected to
one another
Contrast
Contrasts variety of aspects
between the two works in
rich detail to illustrate the
striking differences between
the works despite the
similarity in their respective
historical, cultural, stylistic,
and/or philosophical
contexts
Contrasts variety of aspects
between the two works to
illustrate the striking
differences between the
works despite the similarity
in their respective historical,
cultural, stylistic, and/or
philosophical contexts
Contrasts some aspects
between the two works to
illustrate the differences
between the works despite
the similarity in their
respective historical, cultural,
stylistic, and/or philosophical
contexts
Does not provide historic
background information for
the reader nor does the
submission identify how
information relates to its
context in terms of subject
matter and/or does not
determine how the visual
appearance of the artwork
reflects or expresses the
larger qualities, elements, or
features of its particular style
movement
20
Comparison does not
address two antiquity to
Renaissance and
Reformation works to
illustrate how respective
historical, cultural, stylistic,
and/or philosophical
contexts are connected to
one another
Contrast does not address
two antiquity to Renaissance
and Reformation works
and/or is unclear and does
not illustrate the differences
between the works
20
20
Reflection
Writing
Mechanics
Meets “Proficient” criteria
and reflection is
substantiated by course
materials or other sources
that document the
importance of the
humanities and/or artistic
analysis
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization, and is
presented in a professional
and easy-to-read format
Provides a thoughtful and
detailed reflection on how
the study of the humanities
relates to one’s personal life
and/or professional field
Does not fully address the
personal importance of
studying the humanities
Does not include a reflection
on the study of the
humanities
20
Submission includes only
minor errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling,
syntax, and organization that
do not impact readability and
articulation of main ideas
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that negatively
impact readability and
articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that prevent
understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total
100%
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades