Answer & Explanation:Altex Corporation
Read Case 3: Altex Corporation in the case study
section of your text. Write a summary of the case and answer the
following questions from the end of the case.
Why was a risk management plan considered unnecessary?
Should risk management planning be performed in the proposal stage or after contract award, assuming that it must be done?
Does the customer have the right to expect the
contractor to perform risk analysis and develop a risk management plan
if it is not called out as part of the contractual statement of work?
Would Altex have been more interested in developing a risk management plan if the project were funded entirely from within?
How might the Army have responded if they were presented with a risk management plan early during the R&D activities?
Can risk management planning be justified on almost all programs and projects?
Your paper must be 2-4 pages in length (not
including title and reference pages), doubled spaced, and formatted
according to APA style as outlined in the approved style guide. A
minimum of two sources, including the text, must be used to complete
this assignment.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.Please follow grading rubrics/pdf case study below——————————————————————————————————————————————Description:
Total Possible Score: 5.00
Summarize the Case Study
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Exceptionally clear and concise summary of the case study.
Proficient – Adequately summarizes the case study. A few minor details have not been included.
Basic – A summary of the case study is provided; however, important and relevant details have been omitted.
Below Expectations – Attempts to summarize the case study, but not enough detail is provided.
Non-Performance – The summary of the case study is either non-existent
or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Responses to Questions
Total: 3.00
Distinguished – All answers are accurate, clear, and precise. The
answers are detailed, specific, and relevant to the question at hand.
The answers consider different points of view, address complexities in
the question when applicable, and incorporate a variety of perspectives.
Proficient – Most answers are accurate, clear, and precise. Most
answers are detailed, specific, and relevant to the question at hand.
Most of the answers consider different points of view, address
complexities in the question when applicable, and incorporate a variety
of perspectives.
Basic – Some answers are accurate, clear, and precise. Some answers are
detailed, specific, and relevant to the question at hand. Some of the
answers consider different points of view, address complexities in the
question when applicable, and incorporate a variety of perspectives.
Below Expectations – A few answers are accurate, clear, and precise. A
few answers are detailed, specific, and relevant to the question at
hand. A few of the answers consider different points of view, address
complexities in the question when applicable, and incorporate a variety
of perspectives.
Non-Performance – None of the answers are accurate, clear, or precise.
No answers consider different points of view, address complexities in
the question when applicable, or incorporate a variety of perspectives.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the
issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary
for full understanding.
Proficient – Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered,
delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but
may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic
understanding.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of
syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work
contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and
mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a
few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as
spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may
slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or
mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major
errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
APA Formatting
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper; however, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. Layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA
formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to
distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Page Requirement
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirements predetermined in the assignment description.
Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement.
Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Resource Requirement
Total: 0.20
Distinguished – Provides ample resources and uses the correct amount of sources from the specified search agent.
Proficient – Provides the approximate number of sources, while using
some of the correct search agents specified in the assignment
instructions.
Basic – Provides over half of the sources required in the assignment instructions.
Below Expectations – Barely provides adequate resources and unable to include sources from specified search agent.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
page_1_altex_case_study.pdfpage_2_altex_case_study.pdfpage_3_altex_case_study.pdf
page_1_altex_case_study.pdf
page_2_altex_case_study.pdf
page_3_altex_case_study.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more