Dave Laskin worked for an advertising company, Ad Co., and was… Dave Laskin worked for an advertising company, Ad Co., and was often required to take clients out to lunch to give them his pitch. He travelled from the office to these appointments in a company car with “Ad Co.” painted on the side of the vehicle. On July 15, 2020, he took a client out for lunch to a local pub, The Tavern. Throughout the course of the very long “lunch”, Dave had about 10 drinks. Despite feeling a bit tipsy when he left, Dave decided to drive back to the office. But as he was pulling out of the parking lot, a bee flew into his car. While attempting to swat at the bee, he accidentally slammed on the accelerator. He ended up running into Gary Dickson, who was riding his bike across the entrance of the parking lot at the time. Gary was thrown from his bike. At the hospital, Gary was diagnosed with a broken arm and a skull fracture. The doctor noted that Gary’s head injury would not have been as severe had he been wearing a helmet. In all, he ended up missing three months of work while recovering from his injuries, particularly his severe headaches. But even after recovering physically, Gary was still psychologically affected by the accident. He went into a major depression and required ongoing counselling. Gary is talking to you on July 10, 2022, and notes that he is thinking about bringing an action against the persons he thinks might be liable for his injuries. In his jurisdiction, there is a two-year limitation period for all claims.Follow the approach to a case analysis set out above and discuss who Gary might bring an action against and his chance of success. Your detailed analysis and discussion should include:1. The basis, if any, upon which Ad Co. might be liable for Dave’s conduct.2. Any defences that may be raised by the defendants.3. The avenues of dispute resolution available to the parties, including the factors parties should consider in assessing the avenues.4. The impact of the two-year limitation period on Gary’s action against the defendants; and5. The remedies available to Gary should he succeed in his court action. Business Management Business Law LAW 2300
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more