Expert answer:women and men’s health, dementia
Solved by verified expert:please see attached file
case_69_alz.pdf
assignment_1.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Assignment 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
Select a type of cancer associated with women’s or men’s health such as breast, cervical,
or ovarian cancer in women and prostate cancer in men.
Locate and review articles examining the type of cancer you selected.
Review the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force article in the Learning Resources. Think
about available preventive services that providers might recommend for patients at risk of
this type of cancer.
Select two of the following factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Reflect
on how these factors might impact decisions related to preventive services.
Consider drug treatment options for patients diagnosed with the type of cancer you
selected including short-term and long-term implications of the treatments.
Write a 3- to 4- page paper that addresses the following:
•
•
•
Describe available preventive services that providers might recommend for patients at
risk of the type of cancer you selected.
Explain how the factors you selected might impact decisions related to preventive
services.
Describe drug treatment options for patients diagnosed with the type of cancer you
selected. Explain the short-term and long-term implications of these treatments.
Excellent
Quality of Work
Submitted:
The extent of
which work
meets the
assigned criteria
and work
reflects graduate
level critical and
analytic thinking.
Good
Points:
Points:
Points Range:
27 (27%) – 30
(30%)
Points Range:
24 (24%) – 26
(26%)
Assignment
exceeds
expectations.
All topics are
addressed with
a minimum of
75% containing
exceptional
breadth and
depth about
Assignment
meets
expectations.
All topics are
addressed
with a
minimum of
50%
containing
good breadth
Fair
Points:
Points Range: 21
(21%) – 23 (23%)
Assignment
meets most of
the
expectations.
One required
topic is either
not addressed or
inadequately
addressed.
Poor
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 20
(20%)
Assignment
superficially
meets some of
the
expectations.
Two or more
required topics
are either not
addressed or
inadequately
Excellent
each of the
assignment
topics.
Feedback:
Good
and depth
about each of
the
assignment
topics.
Fair
Feedback:
Poor
addressed.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Quality of Work
Submitted:
The purpose of
the paper is
clear.
A clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement is
provided
which
delineates all
required
criteria.
Points:
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Purpose of the
assignment is
stated, yet is
brief and not
descriptive.
Purpose of the
assignment is
vague or off
topic.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points Range:
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Demonstrates
a clear
understanding
of key
concepts.
Shows some
degree of
understanding
of key concepts.
Shows a lack
of
understanding
of key
concepts,
deviates from
No purpose
statement was
provided.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Assimilation and
Synthesis of
Ideas:
The extend to
which the work
reflects the
student’s ability
to:
Understand and
interpret the
assignment’s key
Points:
Points Range:
9 (9%) – 10
(10%)
Demonstrates
the ability to
critically
appraise and
intellectually
explore key
Feedback:
Excellent
concepts.
concepts.
Good
Fair
Feedback:
Poor
topics.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Assimilation and
Synthesis of
Ideas:
The extend to
which the work
reflects the
student’s ability
to:
Apply and
integrate
material in
course resources
(i.e. video,
required
readings, and
textbook) and
credible outside
resources.
Points Range:
18 (18%) – 20
(20%)
Demonstrates
and applies
exceptional
support of
major points
and integrates
2 or more
credible
outside
sources, in
addition to 2-3
course
resources to
suppport point
of view.
Points:
Points Range:
16 (16%) – 17
(17%)
Integrates
specific
information
from 1
credible
outside
resource and
2-3 course
resources to
support major
points and
point of view.
Points:
Points:
Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 13
(13%)
Minimally
includes and
integrates
specific
information
from 2-3
resources to
support major
points and point
of view.
Includes and
integrates
specific
information
from 0 to 1
resoruce to
support major
points and
point of view.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Assimilation and
Synthesis of
Ideas:
The extend to
which the work
reflects the
student’s ability
to:
Synthesize
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points Range:
18 (18%) – 20
(20%)
Points Range:
16 (16%) – 17
(17%)
Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 13
(13%)
Synthesizes
and justifies
(defends,
Summarizes
information
gleaned from
Identifies but
does not
interpret or
apply concepts,
Rarely or does
not interpret,
apply, and
Excellent
(combines
various
components or
different ideas
into a new
whole) material
in course
resources (i.e.
video, required
readings,
textbook) and
outside, credible
resources by
comparing
different points
of view and
highlighting
similarities,
differences, and
connections.
Written
Expression and
Formatting
Paragraph and
Sentence
Structure:
Paragraphs
make clear
points that
support well
developed ideas,
flow logically,
and
demonstrate
continuity of
ideas. Sentences
explains,
validates,
confirms)
information
gleaned from
sources to
support major
points
presented.
Applies
meaning to the
field of
advanced
nursing
practice.
Good
Fair
Poor
sources to
support major
points, but
does not
synthesize.
and/or
strategies
correctly; ideas
unclear and/or
underdeveloped.
synthesize
concepts,
and/or
strategies.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points:
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
structure, flow,
continuity and
clarity
Feedback:
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
structure,
flow,
continuity and
clarity 80% of
the time.
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing
standards for
structure, flow,
continuity and
clarity 60%- 79%
of the time.
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
structure,
flow,
continuity and
clarity < 60%
of the time.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Feedback:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
are clearly
structured and
carefully
focused--neither
long and
rambling nor
short and lacking
substance.
Points:
Points:
Written
Expression and
Formatting
English writing
standards:
Correct
grammar,
mechanics, and
proper
punctuation
Points Range:
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5
(3.5%)
Contains a few
(1-2)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
Contains several
(3-4) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many
(≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors that
interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.
Feedback:
Written
Expression and
Formatting
The paper
follows correct
APA format for
title page,
headings, font,
spacing, margins,
indentations,
page numbers,
Points:
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Points Range:
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Uses correct
APA format
with no errors.
Contains a few
(1-2) APA
format errors.
Feedback:
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5
(3.5%)
Contains several
(3-4) APA format
errors.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many
(≥ 5) APA
format errors.
Feedback:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
running head,
parenthetical/intext citations,
and reference
list.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Show Descriptions
Show Feedback
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical
and analytic thinking.-Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Good 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing
good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Fair 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or
inadequately addressed.
Poor 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are
either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Feedback:
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.-Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required
criteria.
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
No purpose statement was provided.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to:
Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts.-Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
Good 8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
Fair 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
Poor 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to:
Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook)
and credible outside resources.-Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more
credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.
Good 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to
support major points and point of view.
Fair 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major
points and point of view.
Poor 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and
point of view.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in
course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by
comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from
sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing
practice.
Good 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not
synthesize.
Fair 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear
and/or underdeveloped.
•
Poor 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting
•
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed
ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and
carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.-Levels of Achievement:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
80% of the time.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
60%- 79% of the time.
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity <
60% of the time.
Feedback:
•
Written Expression and Formatting
•
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation-Levels of Achievement:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
•
Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting
•
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,
indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.-Levels of Achievement:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Feedback:
Assignment 2
2. The case you will review is Case 69: Alzheimer’s
Disease and this is the first 3 pages of the
document. You need to fully answer questions 1
through 6.
3. Pages 4-8 of the document will walk you through
the steps of how to effectively identify drug therapy
problems. This is a tool to help you, including the
sample Pharmaceutical Patient Care Record. You are
free to choose if you want to use the care record, but it
is not required. I would suggest that it will help you
thoroughly parse out your case for maximum points.
4. Please do not write paragraph after paragraph when
answering the questions of this case. Complete
answers can be given in bullet points and/or tables–as
long as all information needed is present.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades