Solved by verified expert:additional file will be uploaded
week_3_assignment.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Week 3 – Assignment
Discipline Based Literature Review
In this assignment you will choose three general topics of interest to you related to psychological
assessment from the list below.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Infants and preschool-aged children
Children ages 5 through 12 years
Children with neurodevelopmental disorders
Neuropsychological assessment of adolescents
Children and adolescents with anxiety disorders
Children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Intellectual assessment of adults
Individuals with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders
Individuals with obsessive-compulsive and related disorders
Individuals with intellectual disabilities
Individuals with autism spectrum disorders
Individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder
Individuals with depressive disorders
Individuals with neurocognitive disorders
Individuals with hearing impairments
Individuals with visual impairments
Gifted individuals
Individuals who have served in the military
Research five peer-reviewed articles in the Ashford University Library that were published within the
last 15 years, including a minimum of one article for each of your three chosen topics. In your paper,
begin with an introduction that describes the role of assessment in diagnosis and treatment. Using
your researched articles, compare at least two psychological or educational tests and/or assessment
procedures for each of the topics chosen. Analyze and describe the psychometric methodologies
employed in the development and/or validation of the tests and/or assessment procedures
associated with each of the three topics. Debate any relevant approaches to assessment of the
constructs being evaluated by any tests and assessments you described. Include an analysis of any
challenges related to assessing individuals from diverse social and cultural backgrounds for each of
the three topics. Conclude by evaluating the ethical and professional issues that influence the
interpretation of testing and assessment data. You may cite from your textbook to assist you in the
development of your introduction and the conclusion of your paper; however, the textbook cannot
count as one of the five required peer-reviewed articles.
Writing the Literature Review
The Literature Review:
•
•
Must be 6 to double-spaced pages in length (not including title or references pages) and must
be formatted according to APA style
Must include a title page with the following:
o Title of paper
o Student’s name
o Course name and number
o Instructor’s name
o
Date submitted
Must begin with an introduction that describes the role of assessment in diagnosis and
treatment.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must end with a conclusion that summarizes your evaluation addressing the current use of
psychological tests and the role of assessment in diagnosis and treatment.
Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last 15 years, all of which
come from the Ashford University Library.
Must document all sources in APA style
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the
criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
•
•
•
•
•
•
ext
Gregory, R. J. (2014). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (7th ed.). Boston, MA:
Pearson.
•
This text is a Constellation™ course digital materials (CDM) title.
E-Books
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Barnhill, J. W. (Ed.). (2014). DSM-5 Clinical Cases. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Articles
Ægisdóttir, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. S., Nichols,
C. N.,…Rush, J. D. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of
accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3),
341-382. doi:10.1177/0011000005285875
American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7-19.
doi:10.1037/a0029889
Baez, H. B. (2013). Personality tests in employment selection: Use with caution (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site.. Cornell HR Review. Retrieved from
http://www.cornellhrreview.org/personality-tests-in-employment-selection-use-with-caution/
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014a). Case description: Mr. I—Psychiatric inpatientinterpretive
report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Retrieved from
http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF_Interp_PsyInpatient.pdf
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014b). Case description: Mr. M—Forensic, pre-trial criminal score
report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Retrieved from
http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2RF_Score_ForensicPretrial.pdf
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014c). Case description: Ms. X—Forensic, neuropsychological score
report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Retrieved from
http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RF_Score_ForensicNeuro.pdf
Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014a). MMP1-2-RF Police Candidate Interpretive Report (Links to
an external site.)Links to an external site.[PDF].
Retrieved from http://downloads.pearsonclinical.com/images/Assets/MMPI-2-RF/MMPI-2-RFPCIR.pdf
Ekinci, B. (2014). The Relationship among Sternberg’s triarchic abilities, Gardner’s multiple intelligences,
and academic achievement. Social Behavior & Personality, 42(4), 625-633. doi:
10.2224/sbp.2014.42.4.625
Elbulok-Charcape, M.M., Rabin, L.A., Spadaccini, A.T., & Barr, W.B. (2014). Trends in the
neuropsychological assessment of ethnic/racial minorities: A survey of clinical neuropsychologists in
the United States and Canada. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 353–361.
doi:10.1037/a0035023
Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Morris, R. D., & Lyon, G. R. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of
learning disabilities in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry, 34(3), 506-522. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.
Grove, W. M., & Lloyd, M. (2006). Meehl’s contribution to clinical versus statistical prediction. Journal of
Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 192-194. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.192
Hampshire, A., Highfield, R. R., Parkin, B. L., & Owen, A. M. (2012). Fractionating human
intelligence. Neuron, 76(6). 1225–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.022
Handel, R. W., & Archer, R. P. (2008). An investigation of the psychometric properties of the MMPI-2
Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales with mental health inpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment,
90(3), 239-249. doi:10.1080/00223890701884954
Healthwise Staff. (2014). Mental health assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Retrieved from http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/mental-health-assessment
Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment
selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1270-1285. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1270
Johnson, R. (2013). Forensic and culturally responsive approach for the DSM-5: Just the
FACTS. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 17(1), 18-22. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost
database.
McDermott, P. A., Watkins, M. W., & Rhoad, A. M. (2014). Whose IQ is it?—Assessor bias variance in
high-stakes psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 207-214. doi:
10.1037/a0034832
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N.
(2007). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests
for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 1029-1049.
Peterson, M. H., Griffith, R. L., Isaacson, J. A., O’Connell, M. S., & Mangos, P. M. (2011). Applicant
faking, social desirability, and the prediction of counterproductive work behaviors. Human
Performance. 24(3), 270–290. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.580808
Randall, J. R., Rowe, B. H., Dong, K. A., Nock, M. K., & Colman, I. (2013). Assessment of self-harm risk
using implicit thoughts (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Psychological
Assessment, 25(3), 714-721. doi:10.1037/a0032391
Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general intelligence (IQ)
and emotional intelligence (EQ): The Role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on cross-border leadership
effectiveness in a globalized world. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4). 825-840. Retrieved from the
EBSCOhost database.
Sellbom, M., Anderson, J. L., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). Assessing DSM-5 Section III personality traits and
disorders with the MMPI-2-RF. Assessment,20(6), 709-722. doi:10.1177/1073191113508808
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014a). Building better organizations: Industrialorganizational psychology in the workplace (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/visibilitybrochure/memberbrochure.aspx
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014b). Maximizing human potential within
organizations: Learning the science behind talent management (Links to an external site.)Links to an
external site.. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/visibilitybrochure/visibility.aspx
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014c). Top minds and bottom lines: What can I-O
psychology do for your business? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Retrieved from
http://www.siop.org/visibilitybrochure/topminds.aspx
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2006). Testing and assessment: A
guide to good practices for workforce investment professionals (Links to an external site.)Links to an
external site.[PDF]. Retrieved from http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEN/ten2007/TEN2107a1.pdf
Volkmar, F., Siegel, M., Woodbury-Smith, M. King, B., McCracken, J., State, M., & the American
Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) Committee on Quality Issues (CQI).
(2014). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with
autism spectrum disorder (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [PDF]. Journal of the
American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(2), 237-257.
doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.10.013
Youngstrom, E. A. (2013). Future directions in psychological assessment: Combining evidence-based
medicine innovations with psychology’s historical strengths to enhance utility. Journal of Clinical
Child & Adolescent Psychology. 42(1), 139-159. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.736358.
Multimedia
de Rossier, L. (Producer) & Boutinard-Rouelle, P. (Director). (2011). IQ: A history of deceit (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site. [Video file]. Retrieved from
https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?Token=52818&aid=18596&Plt=FOD&loid=0&w=6
40&h=480&ref
Moloney, C. (Writer), Breitenmoser, K. (Director), & De Robbio, M. (Producer). (2013).Psychometric
testing and employment. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. [Video file]. Retrieved
from
https://fod.infobase.com/OnDemandEmbed.aspx?Token=53207&aid=18596&Plt=FOD&loid=0&w=6
40&h=480&ref
Web Pages
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
including 2010 amendments: Standard 9: Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external
site..Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=12
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct:
Standard 9: Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..Retrieved from
http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=12
American Psychological Association. (2010). Standard 9: Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to
an external site..Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=12
University of Iowa Geriatric Education Center. (2014). Geriatric Assessment Tools: Dementia and
Delirium (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Retrieved from
http://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/igec/tools/categoryMenu.asp?categoryID=1
Websites
Storybird (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (http://storybird.com/)
Storybird Help Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (http://help.storybird.com/)
Supplemental Materials
Ashford University Career Services (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
(http://www.ashford.edu/student_services/careerservices.htm)
Harper, Y. (2014a). PSY640 Checklist for evaluating tests [PDF]. College of Health and Human Services,
Ashford University, San Diego, CA.
Harper, Y. (2014b). PSY640 Content for Testing Pamphlets and Information Sheets (Links to an external
site.) [PDF]. College of Health, Ashford University: San Diego, CA.
Herron, T. (2014). Storybird quick-start guide (Links to an external site.) [PDF]. Ashford University: San
Diego, CA.
Kennedy, N., & Harper Y. (2014a). PSY640 Week four psychological assessment report (Links to an
external site.) [PDF]. College of Health and Human Services, Ashford University, San Diego, CA.
Kennedy, N., & Harper, Y. (2014b). PSY640 Week six clinical neuropsychological report for Mr.
W (Links to an external site.) [PDF]. College of Health, Ashford University: San Diego, CA.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more