Expert answer:Summary of Heroin Dependence

Solved by verified expert:No page requirement needed just need to have every part of the article review complete.
article_review.pdf

herroin_use.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

ARTICLE REVIEW
An article review is an assignment that shows that you can read a psychological article and interpret its
strengths and weaknesses. You must show that you are familiar with research designs, can interpret
data, and evaluate the article. It should contain a summary of the article and your reaction/evaluation.
Part A: Summary Summarize the article in your own words. Be sure to describe the research design and
give the pertinent and important information.
Part B: Reaction Include your scientific observations about the article. Be sure to include all of the
following:
Major strengths of the article/research design
Major weaknesses of the article/research design
Was this an ethical study and why/why not?
Was the participant sample of adequate size, composition, etc.?
Any bias (researcher or participant)?
If an experimental design, identify the independent variable, dependent variable, experimental group,
and control group
If a correlational design, was there a positive, negative, or zero correlation?
Overall, was this a sound (strong) study and why?
How could this experiment/study have been improved? What further studies could come from it?
Part C: Your Voice This is an informal paragraph explaining any problems you may have encountered
with the assignment, and sharing something that you learned from it. You may also include any
explanations that you think I need regarding your work.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Summary __________
Research Design __________
Strengths __________
Weaknesses __________
Ethics __________
Sample __________
Bias __________
Future studies __________
Works Cited __________
Critical Thinking (CRITICAL CORE Signature rubric) __________
WISCONSIN MEDICAL JOURNAL
Heroin Dependence
Randy Brown, MD
ABSTRACT
Heroin use, particularly injection use, is a problem of
great public health importance. The risks associated
with heroin dependence, such as HIV and viral hepatitis, and the social costs due to associated crime and
poverty exceed those of most other drugs of abuse.
Increasing purity and decreasing cost of heroin likely
contribute to trends of decreasing age at first use and an
increasing rate of initiation into regular use in the
United States. Effective treatment is available for
heroin dependence, so primary care providers should
screen patients for this disorder. This article reviews the
epidemiology of heroin use and dependence in the
United States and outlines what is known regarding
risk factors for initiation of heroin use and for heroin
dependence.
INTRODUCTION
Heroin, originally developed by the Bayer Pharmaceutical
Company as a cough suppressant in 1895, is derived
from the opium poppy, placing it in the class of chemicals known as opiates.1 Opiates have been used for centuries for their pain relieving and euphorigenic properties. (Other modern opioids include morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, hydromorphone, and
methadone.) Although they possess several beneficial
properties, including vasodilatory action and unmatched analgesic effectiveness, the positive reinforcing
(euphorigenic) properties of opiates, particularly
heroin, create the potential for addiction (and/or dependence). In fact, 53% of individuals who have ever
used heroin become dependent, as opposed to 11% of
alcohol users and 15% of marijuana users.2
Doctor Brown is a clinical instructor at the University of Wisconsin
Department of Family Medicine and a PhD student at the
University of Wisconsin Department of Population Health
Sciences. He is also a consulting physician in addiction at
Madison Health Services Methadone Treatment Facility, Meriter
Hospital Addiction Medicine Consult Service, and UW Hospitals
and Clinics.
20
What is Dependence (or Addiction)?
Opioid dependence is a chronic relapsing condition
characterized by compulsive self-administration of opioids despite adverse consequences. The most widely
cited sets of criteria for a diagnosis of opioid dependence come from The World Health Organization’s
ICD-10, Classification of Mental and Behavioral
Disorders3 and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV).4 The ICD-10
defines a dependence syndrome as “a cluster of physiological, behavioral, and cognitive phenomena in which
the use of a substance or a class of substances takes on
a much higher priority for a given individual than other
behaviors that once had greater value.” According to
the ICD-10, drug dependence manifests in compulsive
substance use despite evidence of harm due to use, the
presence of characteristic withdrawal phenomena upon
discontinuation or drastic reduction of use, development of tolerance to the effects of the substance, and
dysfunction in other life areas due to use and/or preoccupation with use. DSM-IV criteria differ slightly and
are outlined in Table 1.
The term “addiction” is often used among specialists
in addiction medicine to refer to the syndrome involving the combination of physical and psychological dependence, as defined in the DSM-IV. The term “addiction,” however, is not explicitly used in the DSM-IV or
ICD-10.
The Impact of Heroin Dependence
Heroin use, particularly injection use, is a problem of
major public health importance. The risks associated
with heroin dependence, such as HIV and viral hepatitis, and the social costs due to associated crime and
poverty exceed those of most other drugs.5 Though
more difficult to measure objectively, familial dysfunction and disruption are also significant consequences of
heroin dependence. Children of opiate dependent parents appear to be at increased risk of certain forms of
psychopathology (particularly attention deficit disorders, anxiety, and depression) and future substance use
disorders.6
Wisconsin Medical Journal 2004 • Volume 103, No. 4
WISCONSIN MEDICAL JOURNAL
Survey data from the Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration indicate that heroin use
and dependence are on the rise. During the latter half of
the 1990s, the annual number of heroin initiates rose to
a level not reached since the late 1970s. In 1974, there
were an estimated 246,000 heroin initiates. Between
1988 and 1994, the annual number of new users ranged
from 28,000 to 80,000. Between 1995 and 2001, the
number of new heroin users was consistently greater
than 100,000.3 The increased purity and reduced cost of
heroin in recent years is thought to contribute to this
overall increase in use. From the late 1980s to the late
1990s heroin purity increased from 10% to between
40% and 60% while cost decreased by two-thirds.
(Purity has increased to a greater degree and cost decreased to a greater degree on the US East Coast, where
South American sources predominate, as opposed to
the West Coast, where Mexican heroin is more commonplace.)7 Individuals who might have previously
been intimidated by the need to inject heroin to experience euphoria are now able to smoke (“chase the
dragon”) or use it intranasally to achieve desired effects. In addition, increased purity and decreased cost
likely contribute to the decreasing age of initiation into
heroin use from a mean of 27 years in 1988 to a mean of
19 years in 1995.8
Heroin dependence exacts significant costs to society via medical care, crime, social welfare, and lost productivity. The estimated cost of heroin addiction in the
United States was $21.9 billion in 1996. Of these costs,
productivity losses accounted for approximately $11.5
billion (53%), criminal activities $5.2 billion (24%),
medical care $5 billion (23%), and social welfare $0.1
billion (0.5%). 5
Heroin users have a death rate 13-17 times that of
their age-matched peers, and a 14-fold risk of suicide.9-12
Between 10% and 35% of deaths in heroin-dependent
individuals are due to suicide.12 Overdose and suicide result in a significant loss of life years, as these deaths typically occur during the 3rd and 4th decades of life.10,11
Etiology of Opiate Dependence
Existing literature supports a complex etiology for
drug dependence with genetic,13-16 physiologic/neurochemical,17-20 psychological,21-24 and social25-27 contributing factors. A final common biological pathway
in opiate dependence appears to be the upregulation of
cyclic AMP at the level of individual neurons in the
central nervous system, particularly in the region
known as the locus caeruleus. This occurs as an adaptation to chronic inhibition of cyclic AMP by opiates.
This phenomenon likely at least partially explains the
Table 1. DSM-IV1 Criteria for Opiate Dependence
A maladaptive pattern of use, leading to clinically significant
impairment or distress, as manifested by 3 (or more) of the following, occurring at any time in the same 12-month period:
1.
Tolerance, as defined by either of the following:
a.
need for markedly increased amounts of opiate to
achieve intoxication or desired effect
b.
markedly diminished effect with continued use of
the same amount of opiate
2.
Withdrawal, as manifested by either of the following:
a.
the characteristic withdrawal syndrome for opiates
(3 of: dysphoric mood, nausea or vomiting, muscle
aches, lacrimation or rhinorrhea, diarrhea, yawning, fever, insomnia, gooseflesh, sweating)
b.
the same (or a closely related) substance is taken
to relieve or avoid withdrawal symptoms
3.
Opiates taken in larger amounts over a longer time period than intended
4.
Persistent desire or unsuccessful attempts to cut down
or control opiate use
5.
Great deal of time spent in activities necessary to obtain
or use opiates or to recover from their effects
6.
Important social, occupational, or recreational activities
are given up or reduced because of opiate use
7.
Opiate use continues despite knowledge of having a
persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem
that is likely caused or exacerbated by opiates
phenomena of tolerance and withdrawal (see Table 1)
occurring with the long-term use of opiates.28
DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY
Obtaining accurate estimates of the prevalence of
heroin dependence is difficult. Given an estimated
prevalence of approximately 1%, very large samples
would need to be surveyed to obtain adequate information for analysis. In existing surveys, the stigma attached to illicit drug use likely leads to underestimation
of prevalence due to concealment.29 Additionally, populations at particular risk for opiate dependence (homeless and institutionalized populations) are underrepresented in household surveys. Finally, heroin use and
addiction is often concentrated within relatively circumscribed groups or areas, and, thus, is not detectable
in aggregated data covering the general population.
However, given the strong association between any
heroin use and the development of dependence, estimates of heroin use provide important information regarding populations at risk for future dependence and
the need for addiction treatment.30
There are an estimated 800,000-1 million opiate-dependent individuals in the United States.4,31-33
Increasing purity of the heroin supply has led to an increase in intranasal (snorting) and smoking over injec-
Wisconsin Medical Journal 2004 • Volume 103, No. 4
21
WISCONSIN MEDICAL JOURNAL
Table 2. Characteristics of Major Epidemiologic Studies of Heroin Dependence
Study
Year
Examined
Method
Population
N
NSDUH
1999
Computer-assisted interview
Independent multi-stage area probability
sample of US households
68,126
DAWN
1999
Passive surveillance
Patients of emergency departments
in 21 US metropolitan areas
554,570
MTF
1999
Self-administered questionnaire in
random samples of classrooms
established through 3-stage
(geographic area, school, classroom) stratification process
US 8th, 10th, and 12th graders
43,700
Dorus & Senay38
1980
Interview and questionnaires
Opiod-dependent individuals entering
1 of 30 Chicago treatment centers
432
NSDUH = National Survey on Drug Use and Health (formerly National Household Survey on Drug Abuse); DAWN = Drug Abuse Warning Network;
MTF = Monitoring the Future Study
tion use, since, with heroin of higher purity, these
routes of use yield highly euphoric effects not possible
with the less pure heroin supplies of the past. This has
likely directly affected the demographic characteristics
of the heroin using and dependent population.
Individuals previously intimidated by the injection
route of drug use may be willing to attempt smoking or
intranasal use. This is thought to have made heroin use
less intimidating to adolescents and to have contributed
to the increase in heroin use and a younger heroinusing population in the United States in recent years.3436 However, 37% of new heroin users have injected.32,37
Three major data sources exist for estimates of the
prevalence of heroin use in the United States: the
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse
(NHSDA),32 the Monitoring the Future Study
(MTF),38 and the Drug Abuse Warning Network
(DAWN).37 The populations studied and methods used
vary significantly between these databases. The characteristics of these surveys and an additional study on demographics of heroin users in a Chicago treatment program and 1 United Kingdom study are presented in
Table 2. The demographic characteristics of the populations surveyed in these studies are presented in Table 3.
The NHSDA, through face-to-face surveys of randomly selected households in all 50 states, reports on
the use of illicit drugs by individuals age 12 and older.
The lifetime prevalence (at least 1 use in a person’s lifetime) for heroin for those age 12 and older was 1.4%.
The NHSDA also found a higher rate of heroin dependence in urban areas (particularly in New York
where the prevalence is 2500-3000 per 100,000) and in
the Northeast and on the West Coast.
22
According to the 1999 MTF, a national survey involving randomly selected US classrooms of 8th, 10th, and
12th graders, rates of heroin use remained relatively stable
from the late 1970s through the early 1990s. After 1991,
however, use began to rise among 10th and 12th graders,
and after 1993, among 8th graders. In 1999, prevalence of
heroin use was comparable for all 3 grade levels. Past year
prevalence rates for heroin use in 1999 were about 2 to 3
times higher than those reported in 1991.
DAWN presents data regarding drug-related emergency room visits to emergency departments in 21 US
metropolitan areas. Rates of emergency department
visits precipitated by heroin use remained statistically
stable from 2000 to 2002 at 36 per 100,000 population
(93,519 ER visits, or 14% of drug-related ER visits) in
the 21 metropolitan areas included in the surveillance.
However, mentions of heroin use in ER visit records,
where the ER visit was not directly due to heroin use,
have increased by 35% since 1995. The highest rates of
heroin use mentions per 100,000 population occur in
the 25-34 year old age range, and occur for men 2 to 4
times as frequently as women.37
Of patients entering treatment for heroin dependence in 1998, 50% were non-Hispanic white, 25% were
Hispanic, and 22% were non-Hispanic black. Van
Etten and Anthony39 also found strong associations between black or Hispanic ethnicity and rates of heroin
dependence.
Hickman et al30 and Dorus et al40 found similar demographic risk factors with male heroin users outnumbering
female users by 2:1, young adulthood (early to late 20s)
being the age of greatest representation, and with black
ethnicity being disproportionately represented.
Wisconsin Medical Journal 2004 • Volume 103, No. 4
WISCONSIN MEDICAL JOURNAL
Table 3. Demographic Characteristics of Study Samples in Major Epidemiologic Studies of Heroin Dependence
Gender
Race
Study
Year
N
M
F
Age Range
W
AA
NA
As
H
O
NHSDA
1999
68,126
32,092
34,614
12
46,054
7,982
739
2,146
8,481
1,072
DAWN
1999
554,570
291,943 257,860
6
309,910 132,900
NR
NR
56,783
54,977
MTF
1999
43,700
6,410*
6,901*
13-19
9,180**
1,793**
NR
NR
NR
745**
Dorus
& Senay
1980
432
289
143
18
155
277**
NR
NR
NR
NR
NSDUH = National Survey on Drug Use and Health (formerly National Household Survey on Drug Abuse); DAWN = Drug Abuse Warning Network:
MTF = Monitoring the Future Study
W = White; AA = African American; NA = Native American; As = Asian; H = Hispanic; O = multi-racial or unknown; NR = not reported
*Demographic characteristics readily available only for subjects in 12th grade.
**The only racial groups reported in Dorus & Senay were “white” and “black.” Which ethnicities are included in these categories is unclear. Similarly, in
MTF, subjects were restricted to “white, black, or Hispanic” ethnic categories.
The limitations of available data make inference regarding a general estimate of the prevalence of heroin
dependence in the United States difficult. However,
certain statements are supported by the available literature. Male gender and young adult age range (26-34
years) appear to be primary demographic risk factors
for heroin dependence. Black and Hispanic ethnic
groups are also disproportionately represented. Urban
living area is also strongly associated with prevalence of
heroin dependence. Examination of other risk factors
lends further insight into the multifaceted etiology of
heroin dependence.
RISK FACTORS
Many social, behavioral, and psychological factors are
strongly associated with heroin dependence. Indicators
of a low socioeconomic status (SES) have consistently
been associated with heroin use and dependence.27,35,36,41 Investigations have included measurements of individual income and occupation as well as
neighborhood-level indicators of SES. Unskilled occupation,42 as opposed to business or professional occupation, and unemployed versus employed status30,32,43-45
are strongly predictive of heroin use and dependence.
Using multiple regression modeling, Latkin et al41
found associations between individual heroin dependence and neighborhood indicators such as percent of
households with income <50% of poverty (odds ratio 1.37), percent of males unemployed (odds ratio 2.34), and percent of houses that were boarded up in the community (odds ratio 5.88). Educational status is also a strong predictor of heroin use and dependence.46,47 In one study of heroin users seeking treatment, 62% had less than a 12th grade education, a rate far in excess of the general population.33 More complicated social factors have also been found to be significantly associated with heroin use and dependence. Continued social contact with illicit drug users is predictive of ongoing heroin use,44 as is parental absence during childhood.47 Immediate social contact with active heroin users is more strongly associated with ongoing heroin use than is the prevalence of heroin use in an individual’s neighborhood of residence.44 The presence of a specific spiritual or religious practice during childhood may be protective, even in families with parents who use heroin.48 Children of parents with opiate dependence are at increased risk of other major psychopathology (particularly attention and anxiety disorders and depression), as well as decreased academic, family, and social functioning.6 Childhood psychopathology (primarily attention disorders, anxiety, and depression) has also been associated with the later development of substance use disorders, including opiate dependence.49 Suicide risk is increased among individuals with opiate dependence. The presence of other psychopathology or a history of childhood abuse increases this risk.50 TREATMENT Methadone maintenance is the most widespread and extensively researched treatment for opioid addiction. Methadone maintenance has been shown to reduce the frequency of opiate use,51-54 reduce mortality,51,55-57 reduce the transmission of HIV53,58,59 and viral hepatitis,60 improve employment status,57,61 and reduce the frequency of criminal behavior.62-64 Many of these positive effects are strongly associated with higher daily methadone dose and with increasing dur ... Purchase answer to see full attachment

How it works

1. Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
2. Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions 
3. Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
4.  Download the paper after the writer uploads it 

Will the writer plagiarize my essay?

You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.

Is this service safe?

All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades