Expert answer:Identify a local political issue or an issue you c

Solved by verified expert:Part 1: Identify a local political issue or an issue you care about that would benefit from political action. Devise a hypothetical interest group strategy. What is your preferred outcome? How would they influence the policy making process to obtain this outcome?Part 2: In your opinion, do you think interest groups play a positive or negative role in a democratic political system? Explain.Create your assignment in a word-processing program, such as MS Word. Your document must be in .doc, .docx, .rtf, or .pdf format. See the Assignment rubric for grading criteria.rubricExemplary Meets Expectations Developing Novice Not Acceptable Content Points: 20 (40%) All required elements are fully addressed, easily identified, and integrated into the assignment at the highest level. All key facts are clearly identified and completely addressed. Where applicable, outside sources are used in addition to the course text in a highly effective way. Feedback: Points: 16 (32%) All required elements are addressed and identified. Several key facts are identified and completely addressed. Where applicable, outside sources are effectively used in addition to the course text. Feedback: Points: 14 (28%) Required elements are addressed, but further elaboration is needed. A few key facts are identified and addressed. Outside sources are used in addition to the textbook, but are ineffective or not appropriate. Feedback: Points: 12 (24%) Few of the required elements are addressed. Little or no elaboration present. Key facts are NOT identified or addressed. No effort is made to include sources outside the course text(s) where applicable. Feedback: Points: 0 (0%) Assignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content. Feedback: Critical Thinking Points: 20 (40%) Assignment demonstrates highest level of critical thinking. Integration of multiple ideas and/or philosophies is at the highest level. Analysis and solutions are anchored in a solid and sophisticated premise using facts, not opinions. Feedback: Points: 16 (32%) Assignment demonstrates good critical thinking and integration of multiple ideas and/or philosophies. Analysis and solutions are anchored in solid premise using facts, not opinions. Feedback: Points: 14 (28%) Assignment demonstrates some degree of critical thinking and integration of ideas and/or philosophies. Analysis and solutions uses facts in some places, but other portions use opinion. Feedback: Points: 12 (24%) Assignment demonstrates almost no degree of critical thinking or integration of ideas and/or philosophies. Analysis and solutions are incomplete, missing or based on opinion. Feedback: Points: 0 (0%) Assignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content. Feedback: Quality of Work Points: 10 (20%) The quality of writing is exceptional with no spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors; the work is very well-organized, well-developed and sequential; ideas are linked with smooth and effective transitions. Feedback: Points: 8 (16%) The quality of writing is very good with minor spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors that do not interfere with comprehension; the work is well-organized, developed and mostly sequential; ideas are linked effectively. Feedback: Points: 7 (14%) The quality of writing is good with minor spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors that usually do not interfere with comprehension; the work is mostly organized, developed and sequential; ideas are adequately linked. Feedback: Points: 6 (12%) The quality of writing is unacceptable. A number of spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors significantly interfere with comprehension. the work is not organized or developed; ideas are presented randomly. Feedback: Points: 0 (0%) Assignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content. Feedback: Show Descriptions Show Feedback Content–Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 20 (40%) points All required elements are fully addressed, easily identified, and integrated into the assignment at the highest level. All key facts are clearly identified and completely addressed. Where applicable, outside sources are used in addition to the course text in a highly effective way. Meets Expectations 16 (32%) points All required elements are addressed and identified. Several key facts are identified and completely addressed. Where applicable, outside sources are effectively used in addition to the course text. Developing 14 (28%) points Required elements are addressed, but further elaboration is needed. A few key facts are identified and addressed. Outside sources are used in addition to the textbook, but are ineffective or not appropriate. Novice 12 (24%) points Few of the required elements are addressed. Little or no elaboration present. Key facts are NOT identified or addressed. No effort is made to include sources outside the course text(s) where applicable. Not Acceptable 0 (0%) points Assignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content.Feedback:Critical Thinking–Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 20 (40%) points Assignment demonstrates highest level of critical thinking. Integration of multiple ideas and/or philosophies is at the highest level. Analysis and solutions are anchored in a solid and sophisticated premise using facts, not opinions. Meets Expectations 16 (32%) points Assignment demonstrates good critical thinking and integration of multiple ideas and/or philosophies. Analysis and solutions are anchored in solid premise using facts, not opinions. Developing 14 (28%) points Assignment demonstrates some degree of critical thinking and integration of ideas and/or philosophies. Analysis and solutions uses facts in some places, but other portions use opinion. Novice 12 (24%) points Assignment demonstrates almost no degree of critical thinking or integration of ideas and/or philosophies. Analysis and solutions are incomplete, missing or based on opinion. Not Acceptable 0 (0%) points Assignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content.Feedback:Quality of Work–Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 10 (20%) points The quality of writing is exceptional with no spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors; the work is very well-organized, well-developed and sequential; ideas are linked with smooth and effective transitions. Meets Expectations 8 (16%) points The quality of writing is very good with minor spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors that do not interfere with comprehension; the work is well-organized, developed and mostly sequential; ideas are linked effectively. Developing 7 (14%) points The quality of writing is good with minor spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors that usually do not interfere with comprehension; the work is mostly organized, developed and sequential; ideas are adequately linked. Novice 6 (12%) points The quality of writing is unacceptable. A number of spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors significantly interfere with comprehension. the work is not organized or developed; ideas are presented randomly. Not Acceptable 0 (0%) points Assignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content.Feedback:Name:Assignment Rubric

How it works

1. Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
2. Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions 
3. Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
4.  Download the paper after the writer uploads it 

Will the writer plagiarize my essay?

You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.

Is this service safe?

All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades