Expert answer:I want you to incorporate inside that paper (1 to
Solved by verified expert:When you open this attachment you will see an attachment that say A2 paper for Correction the is the one I want you to make a correction. I want you to incorporate inside that paper (1 to 5) therefore I send you an example paper you will see the attachment say A1 paper example follow this example when you incorporate the question from 1 to 5 inside the paper I write it.A2: Case Study Select a specific case.: Case Study on a Single Incident or Event: Study and include:1) What is the paper about?2) Why is this case important to review? 3) Relevant facts of the case.4) Literature review of relevant concepts, theories, legal issues, and best practice policy rules relevant to the facts of the case. 5) A comparison of the facts to the findings of the literature. Case Study Papers should be three (3) pages long in addition to a Title Page and Reference page. They must also include at least five (5) or more References/sources. Incorporate those parts above from 1 to 5 inside that paper (put inside citation) Please read carefully the attachment and follow all those instructions I put there. Find some academic references that base on those APA style rememberREQUIRED TEXTBOOKPeak, Kenneth J. (2016) Justice Administration (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education – Prentice HallLevels of the system. One such contemporary social justice administration concept is the inception of Problem-Solving Courts (http://justiceinnovation.org/portfolio/what-are-problem-solving-courts/).Textbook Web link: https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/progra…
question_for_a2_paper.docx
a2_paper_for_correction.docx
a1_paper_example.docx
question_for_a2_paper.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
A2: Case Study · Select a specific case.: Case Study on a Single Incident or Event:
Study and include:
Introduction:
1) What is the paper about?
2) Why is this case important to review? ·
3) Relevant facts of the case.
4) Literature review of relevant concepts, theories, legal issues, and best practice
policy rules relevant to the facts of the case.
5) A comparison of the facts to the findings of the literature. ·
Case Study Papers should be three (3) pages long in addition to a Title Page and
Reference page. They must also include at least five (5) or more References/sources.
Incorporate those parts above from 1 to 5 inside that paper (put inside citation)
A2: The court system is predicated upon the ultimate need to engender a society that is
based upon the rule of law. For all intents and purposes, the intent of the system is to
provide equal rights and opportunities for all those who fall within the controls and
political boundaries of the United States. The courts are thus charged with executing
those laws as the ultimate arbiters of the existing statutory and case laws at all
Levels of the system. One such contemporary social justice administration concept is the
inception of Problem-Solving Courts(http://justiceinnovation.org/portfolio/what-areproblem-solving-courts/). Problem solving courts have continued to extend their reach
into areas initially from drug use and addiction, to community courts, domestic violence,
and veteran’s courts. The system however, has an equal number of proponents as it does
skeptics.
Research and develop a Focus Paper that addresses a Case Study on a Focused Topic
Area:
a) Select and review one type of problem-solving court weighing the pros and
cons and come to a conclusion if the selected court is effective in utilizing these
types of diversionary methods to accomplish social remediation and future
compliance to the rule of law.
b) The argument must be balanced and supported by credible sources, statistics,
and facts.
Please read carefully the attachment and follow all those instructions I put there. Find
some academic references that base on those
APA style remember
REQUIRED TEXTBOOK
Peak, Kenneth J. (2016) Justice Administration (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Education – Prentice Hall
Levels of the system. One such contemporary social justice administration concept is the
inception of Problem-Solving Courts
(http://justiceinnovation.org/portfolio/what-are-problem-solving-courts/).
Textbook Web link: https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/progra…
Running head: PROBLEM-SOLVING COURTS
1
The Problem-Solving Courts
This study aims at evaluating the contribution of the problem-solving courts to the
issues prevalent in the society. This paper is, therefore, an evaluation of the problem-solving
courts which have been set up in the various locations and its characteristics. Solving cases in
the general courts has been associated with a lot of time being spent before a particular issue
is resolved. For this reason, the government, together with the judiciary, sort to simplify the
process by forming the special courts where society related matters could be solved.
Therefore, in this evaluation, we will focus on the specific details of the problem-solving
courts.
When people live together in a community, they may enter into situations of
conflict. Initially, such issues were resolved amicably among the people since they had a
communal interest. The desire to help each other in difficult times was the aspiration of every
person. With the changing of times across the globe, some values such as those related to the
neighbourhood have changed. More transformations have also been experienced in home
situations whereby the present day families present issues affecting some of their members to
the court of law for a solution (Aldrich, 2003). These changes have been perpetuated by the
formation of categories of courts which have been designed to handle such issues.
The courts that have been formed with the aim of solving problems have
characteristics which are different from other law firms. The first feature is specialization on
a problem. To meet this criterion, the courts are designated to cover a certain locality. Here, it
handles the cases presented by people from that region only. Also, they operate on a given
issue of concern such as drugs affecting a certain group of offenders which is prominent and
PROBLEM-SOLVING COURTS
2
associating with the particular type of crime (Peak, 2016). With this specialization, such a
court is designed to handle any case which is along this jurisdiction.
Secondly, the problem-solving courts have the feature of intervention. Ruling on a
case is not the final solution to the impending situation. The most significant thing is to help
every member in achieving something positive with their lives. Therefore, apart from
providing the legal position on a situation, these courts intervene in ensuring that the given
ruling has been put into action. For instance, if it is a case that involves drug addiction, the
problem-solving courts may decide to have the person rehabilitated. Therefore, it has the
mandate to follow-up and ensures that the person undergoes this process without failure.
There are several advantages as well as disadvantages of having problem-solving
courts. The first merit is the ability to exercise legal specialties for the lawyers and judges.
The specialized courts give the two principals a chance to provide a thoughtful judgment
through the application of their profound specialization in the field (Burke, 2017). This also
helps in relieving unnecessary pressure from the general courts. It also gives the court an
opportunity to provide a ruling that is fair for all sides and which is channeled towards
improving the lives of the affected parties.
Secondly, these courts are advantageous to the society in various ways. The judges
and lawyers take time to understand the situation at hand and perform proper evaluations
before giving their verdict. This is an advantage to the participants. Also, the understanding
level of these principals gives the process a credit factor. The aim of this court is not entirely
to convict law offenders. Rather, it aims at providing a lasting solution to the offended as well
as the offender. For this reason, it does not engage so much in convicting but in the
rehabilitation process for the affected members. This makes the law offenders develop
positive attitudes and easily change their behaviors for the better.
PROBLEM-SOLVING COURTS
3
The major disadvantage of this court is reduced funds in the main courts. A lot of
finances and resources are removed from the general courts and channeled towards the
formation of the specialized courts. It also creates a negative attitude to the country whereby
some cases are perceived to be receiving more attention than others (Burke, 2017). This can
lead to a conflict between the convicted people from the two court systems. It is also possible
for some groups to use the specialized courts to influence the decision of the court or dispute
some individual judges.
The participants also run the risk of being categorized by the nature of their
performance from a court session and ruling. Some may be branded as either good or bad
defendant whereas the situation was ruled fairly depending on the prevailing circumstances.
This separation of defendants into tiers is not safe for them since it ruins their reputation.
Considering all the factors outlined, the question would remain, “Are the problemsolving courts effective in fulfilling their remediation duty in compliance with the rule of
law?” The answer remains a yes. Although there could be some challenges from different
sectors, the courts have been effective in providing amicable solutions to the society (Epstein,
1999). They have involved both sides of the case in determining the possible solution which
is of utmost benefit to the society.
In conclusion, the specialized courts can be commended for their roles in the society.
The courts should be encouraged to continue offering the legal services to the people since
they lead to a simplified and efficient system of resolving situations and removing the burden
of special cases from the general courts. The government should also fund this system so that
it does not drain the resources of the general courts. As for the society, they should take
advantage of the specialized courts and present their issues genuinely with a heart of helping
themselves as well as their neighbors and not cause divisions.
PROBLEM-SOLVING COURTS
4
References
Aldrich, R. M. (2003). What Makes a Domestic Violence Court Work? American Bar
Association.
Burke, C. (2017). Advantages & Disadvantages of Specialized Courts. Legal Beagle.
Epstein, D. (1999). Effective Intervention in Domestic Violence Cases: Rethinking the Roles
of Prosecutors, Judges, and the Court System. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism.
Peak, K. J. (2016). Justice Administration (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Education – Prentice Hall.
Running head: CRIMINAL JUSTICE
1
Criminal Justice
Name:
Cours:
Tutor:
Date: 10/23/2017
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
2
Topic 2: Do those who serve in criminal justice administrative and operational roles
EXERCISE more, equal, or fewer social justice rights than the general population they
serve.
Criminal justice administration has faced constant complex problems. Crimes committed
by youths has made administration systems to work tirelessly in ensuring that the needs of the
society and security forces are met and addressed according to the logical order of the
community. Diversion programs that are put in place to remedy any wrongful convictions may
arise in the process of justice administration. Police officers are designated with duties of
ensuring that information of probable criminal activities is shared accurately, and prevention
mechanisms will be integrated to all justice systems. The responses and challenges have the
potential of finally changing the operating system despite efforts that are made through cocoordinating bodies that help in sharing information about programs and policies of reducing
criminal activities (Peak, 2016). It has been realized that those who are given the administrative
functions have gone ahead to exercise more power in social activities than the population which
they serve.
Literature Review
The rule of law requires the adopted options are administered by all established
procedures. Some ordinary social justice administration is known to the public because they are
enforced consistently as well as even-handedly. Social justice administration is intended to
secure liberty and help people of a particular nation move forward. All individuals that are
accused of breaking the law in many countries are subjected to speedy, free and fair trials to all
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
3
convicted victims. Equal administration of the law ensures that all victims are treated humanely.
The use of civil courts has helped in providing that there is a continuation of justice delivery to
citizens thus limiting oppression that different individuals undergo when they encounter
administrative forces on various occasions. Enforcement of the law is usually divided into
categories and specific personnel required to undertake, control and exercising authority.
Different branches of governance have given the task of ensuring the law protects women,
historically oppressed individuals and ethnic minorities from governmental discrimination as
well as mental oppression from private sectors (Peak, 2016). When taking an example of
American law enforcement, social justice delivery is usually balanced because all citizens have
the chance of fair treatment and protection of state power.
However, citizens have got themselves in crossroads from powerful law enforcement
agencies. The American government has on many occasions ordered executive agencies to create
laws that do not guarantee citizens the freedom of enjoying a social life with equal protection
from criminal activities. Fortunately, there has been the creation of legally enforceable
administrative rules and regulations published by the federal government stating how ordinary
citizens should be treated when they encounter dangerous crimes (Peak, 2016). On American
administration system, the criminal law says that acts defined to threaten the security of the
society and individual well-being are punishable and can be exposed to court cases. In the
current culture, murder, rape, and robbery is covered by criminal law and are all considered to be
threatening the safety of the community as a whole. All those people who are given the mandate
of ensuring that security and settlement of disputes are well chosen should be stated to a certain
degree of social justice.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
4
The United States criminal act requires legal codes to give citizens powers to report any
incarceration issues that may arise within the country. Mental torture, injuries and lack of selfconfidence have been caused by the use of excessive force when administering justice activities
in the country. Many states in the past used death sentences as one of the leading techniques for
reducing criminal activities which were later accompanied by bifurcated trials. The law requires
one to counter aggravating and mitigation of suggestions of offering a ruling. Apparently, many
countries have abolished death sentences that had almost become universal. Surprisingly, a
majority of the American citizens have maintained the need of holding death sentence because of
the prevailing moral standard in the society. With right governance approach, sociological and
evidence-based ruling, it will manage in ensuring that decency is marking the rate at which the
community is maturing based on social justice administration (Peak, 2016). Growing number of
legislatures has pushed execution of all mentally disabled individuals to a national consensus
matter. Governments have worked tirelessly in ensuring that the rule of law and equal
administration of punishment is similar to all individuals when courts find that the offense has no
degree of certitude.
Conclusion
It has been realized that excessive application of force in justice administration has
rendered many individuals to lose interest in government-run institutions. There is an impression
created in America that long-established social engagements have the capacity of producing
conceptual notions about an absolute rule of law. Some of the typical activities carried out
currently are undergoing substantial change to ensure that every person has the right and perfect
transition that take place in confining the nation. The paradox of equal treatment is currently
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
5
being applied across the societal organization with the aim of giving an accurate response on
time. Therefore, the necessity of a state to ensure that comprehensive education on law
application is given to people in which decriminalization; victimology, decentralization, and
deinstitutionalization have managed to resemble social justice administration.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
6
References
Peak, Kenneth J. (2016) Justice Administration (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Education-Prentice Hall https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/progra…
Egalitarianism: https://www.google.com/search?q=egalitarianism&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Social justice: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/social%20justice
A2: Case Study · Select a specific case.: Case Study on a Single Incident or Event:
Study and include:
Introduction:
1) What is the paper about?
2) Why is this case important to review? ·
3) Relevant facts of the case.
4) Literature review of relevant concepts, theories, legal issues, and best practice
policy rules relevant to the facts of the case.
5) A comparison of the facts to the findings of the literature. ·
Case Study Papers should be three (3) pages long in addition to a Title Page and
Reference page. They must also include at least five (5) or more References/sources.
Incorporate those parts above from 1 to 5 inside that paper (put inside citation)
A2: The court system is predicated upon the ultimate need to engender a society that is
based upon the rule of law. For all intents and purposes, the intent of the system is to
provide equal rights and opportunities for all those who fall within the controls and
political boundaries of the United States. The courts are thus charged with executing
those laws as the ultimate arbiters of the existing statutory and case laws at all
Levels of the system. One such contemporary social justice administration concept is the
inception of Problem-Solving Courts(http://justiceinnovation.org/portfolio/what-areproblem-solving-courts/). Problem solving courts have continued to extend their reach
into areas initially from drug use and addiction, to community courts, domestic violence,
and veteran’s courts. The system however, has an equal number of proponents as it does
skeptics.
Research and develop a Focus Paper that addresses a Case Study on a Focused Topic
Area:
a) Select and review one type of problem-solving court weighing the pros and
cons and come to a conclusion if the selected court is effective in utilizing these
types of diversionary methods to accomplish social remediation and future
compliance to the rule of law.
b) The argument must be balanced and supported by credible sources, statistics,
and facts.
Please read carefully the attachment and follow all those instructions I put there. Find
some academic references that base on those
APA style remember
REQUIRED TEXTBOOK
Peak, Kenneth J. (2016) Justice Administration (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Education – Prentice Hall
Levels of the system. One such contemporary social justice administration concept is the
inception of Problem-Solving Courts
(http://justiceinnovation.org/portfolio/what-are-problem-solving-courts/).
Textbook Web link: https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/progra…
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades