Solved by verified expert:Submit your Final Project, which should contain the following sections (the sections can be reordered for appropriate flow): Mission and goals of the organizationEthical considerations related to finance and budgeting within the organizationTechnological considerations for improving the efficiency or effectiveness of finance and budgeting within the organizationApplicable laws, regulations, and policies impacting the organization’s financial and budgetary operationsEvaluation of the organization’s budget process and revenue sourcesInternal factors impacting successful strategic financial planningThe organization’s usage of cost-benefit analysisEvaluation of the organization’s annual financial reportAssessment of the organization’s overall financial condition Your Final Project must demonstrate both breadth and depth of knowledge and critical thinking appropriate to graduate-level scholarship. It must follow the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association guidelines and be free of typographical, spelling, and grammatical errors. Also, you must use at least six scholarly sources from the library that were published within the past five years to support the paper. The project should be 14–15 pages in length (double-spaced), not including the title page, the abstract, and references. Be sure to support your Final Project with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. The Final Project will be evaluated according to the four indicators in the Final Project Rubric. See the Week 10 Project area for submission details.
rubics_.docx
submit__your_final_project.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
•
•
Grid View
List View
Show Descriptions
RESPONSIVENESS TO PAPER OR WRITING ASSIGNMENT—75 points – (Did the student respond adequately to the paper or writing assignment?)-Exemplary 68 (22.67%) – 75 (25%)
Paper or writing assignment is responsive to and exceeds the requirements given in the instructions. It: • Responds to the assigned or selected topic; • Goes beyond
what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated); • Is
substantive and evidence- based; • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic
connects in a meaningful way to the course content; • Is submitted by the due date.
Meets Standards 60 (20%) – 67 (22.33%)
Paper or writing assignment is responsive to and meets the requirements given in the instructions. It: • Responds to the assigned or selected topic; • Is substantive
and evidence-based; • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a
meaningful way to the course content; • Is submitted by the due date.
Progressing 53 (17.67%) – 59 (19.67%)
Paper or writing assignment is somewhat responsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It: • Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic;
and/or • Lacks in substance, relying more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence; and/or • Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered
the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and • Is submitted by the due date
Failing 0 (0%) – 52 (17.33%)
Paper or writing assignment is unresponsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It: • Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or • Relies
primarily on anecdotal evidence; and/or • Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that
the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and/or • Is submitted past the late deadline
RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP, AND PROFESSIONAL STYLE—75 points-Exemplary 68 (22.67%) – 75 (25%)
The paper represents exceptional research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content: • Contributes to the knowledge in the field; • Is well supported by
current and pertinent research/evidence from a variety of primarily primary, peer-reviewed sources (rather than textbooks and websites);
Meets Standards 60 (20%) – 67 (22.33%)
The paper meets graduate-level expectations for research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content: • Summarizes knowledge in the field; • Is supported by
current and pertinent research/evidence from a variety of peer- reviewed books and journals (rather than textbooks and websites);
Progressing 53 (17.67%) – 59 (19.67%)
The paper is somewhat below graduate-level expectations for research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content: • Does not adequately summarize
knowledge in the field; • Is often supported by secondary sources (textbooks and websites) and sources that lack in variety; and/or
Failing 0 (0%) – 52 (17.33%)
The paper is substantially below graduate-level expectations for research, scholarship, and professional style. Paper content: • Does not summarize knowledge in
the field; • For the most part, is unsupported by pertinent research/evidence from a variety of peer-reviewed books and journals; and/or
QUALITY OF WRITING—75 points
(Does the student adhere to a professional writing style that clearly communicates the content?)-Exemplary 68 (22.67%) – 75 (25%)
Writing is scholarly and exceeds graduate-level writing expectations. The paper: • Uses language that is clear, concise, and appropriate; • Has few if any errors in
spelling, grammar, and syntax; • Is extremely well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses the reader; • Uses a preponderance of original language and uses
direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate; • Consistently uses correct APA form and style (including citations, references, use of nonbiased language,
clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) with very few or no errors.
Meets Standards 60 (20%) – 67 (22.33%)
Writing is scholarly and meets graduate-level writing expectations. The paper: • Uses language that is clear; • Has a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; • Is
well organized, logical, and clear; • Uses original language and uses direct quotes when necessary and/or appropriate; • Uses correct APA form and style (including
citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) with only a few errors.
Progressing 53 (17.67%) – 59 (19.67%)
Writing is somewhat below graduate-level writing expectations. The paper: • Uses language that is unclear and/or inappropriate; and/or • Has more than occasional
errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and/or • Is poorly organized, is at times unclear and confusing, and has some problems with logical flow; and/or • Reflects
an underuse of original language and an overuse of direct quotes and paraphrases; and/or • Sometimes lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing
it. • Uses APA form and style (including citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) but has frequent errors.
Failing 0 (0%) – 52 (17.33%)
Writing is well below graduate-level writing expectations. The paper: • Uses unclear and inappropriate language; and/or • Has many errors in spelling, grammar,
and syntax; and/or • Lacks organization in a way that creates confusion for the reader; and/or • Contains many direct quotes from original source materials and/or
consistently and poorly paraphrases rather than using original language; and/or • Does not use or contains pervasive errors in APA style (including citations,
references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.).
CONTENT KNOWLEDGE—75 points (Did the student “get the right answer”? That is, does the answer show that the student learned the information/skills presented?
Is the application of information or skills accurate?)-Exemplary 68 (22.67%) – 75 (25%)
Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides: • In-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful
interpretations or analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions), showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and
ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects them to other ideas; • Rich and relevant examples; • Thought-provoking ideas and
interpretations, original thinking, new perspectives; • Original and critical thinking; • Mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and skills or
strategies presented in the course.
Meets Standards 60 (20%) – 67 (22.33%)
Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides: • Understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course, demonstrating that the
student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented; • Relevant examples; • Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, some original thinking, and
critical thinking; • Mastery and application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course.
Progressing 53 (17.67%) – 59 (19.67%)
Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides: • Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate,
displays some omissions and/or errors; and/or • Few and/or irrelevant examples; and/or • Few if any thought- provoking ideas, little original thinking; and/or •
“Regurgitated” knowledge rather than critical thinking; • Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors when using the knowledge, skills, or strategies presented
in the course
Failing 0 (0%) – 52 (17.33%)
Paper or writing assignment demonstrates/provides: • A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course, and/or application is inaccurate
and contains many omissions and/or errors; and/or • No examples or irrelevant examples; and/or • No thought-provoking ideas or original thinking; and/or • No
critical thinking; • Many critical errors when applying knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course.
Total Points: 300
Submit your Final Project, which should contain the following sections (the sections can
be reordered for appropriate flow):
1. Mission and goals of the organization
2. Ethical considerations related to finance and budgeting within the organization
3. Technological considerations for improving the efficiency or effectiveness of finance and
budgeting within the organization
4. Applicable laws, regulations, and policies impacting the organization’s financial and
budgetary operations
5. Evaluation of the organization’s budget process and revenue sources
6. Internal factors impacting successful strategic financial planning
7. The organization’s usage of cost-benefit analysis
8. Evaluation of the organization’s annual financial report
9. Assessment of the organization’s overall financial condition
Your Final Project must demonstrate both breadth and depth of knowledge and critical
thinking appropriate to graduate-level scholarship. It must follow the Publication Manual
of the American Psychological Association guidelines and be free of typographical,
spelling, and grammatical errors. Also, you must use at least six scholarly sources from
the library that were published within the past five years to support the paper.
The project should be 14–15 pages in length (double-spaced), not including the title
page, the abstract, and references.
Be sure to support your Final Project with specific references to all resources used in its
preparation.
The Final Project will be evaluated according to the four indicators in the Final Project
Rubric. See the Week 10 Project area for submission details.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more