Expert answer:The United States and the European Union: Cultural
Expert answer:Requirements: students are required to write a paper of around 3500 words on one of the topics provided in the list below. The paper should have the form of a scholarly paper, with evidence, notes, bibliography if appropriate. Evidence & FormatYour paper has to meet all formal standards as presented in ‘IR Essay Writing Standard’ and Thesis Manual available on student resources (zasoby) under course1 and course 2. These include:
Requirements relating to a scholarly paper, such as providing evidence that supports your theses, statements and claims, as well as proper referencing. Bibliography should have a sufficient number of academic sources (at least 10 for papers of 1500 words and 20 for 2500 or more words)
Editing rules: title page; font, Times New Roman 12; margins, 2,5 cm; double space between verses; italics for book/periodical titles; single quotation marks, etc. The paper must be logically structured (introduction; the main body subdivided into paragraphs; conclusions) and meet the minimum language standards.
Plagiarism: be aware that anything copied without quotation marks and references is treated as plagiarismList of topics:
Critically evaluate the different axiological assumptions of the European Union and the United States in their response to the immigration crisis.
Assess the ideological assumptions of the EU’s and the US’ approaches to their historical past and their influence onto the contemporary policies by providing relevant examples.
Appraise the European Union as a federal state from the perspective of its historical origins, ideological assumptions and critical assessment of the project.
Explain the different assumptions of the European Union as the first post-political project and the American defense of a political nation state. Provide a critical assessment of their consequences.
Explain (by means of a critical assessment) the differences between the American and the European Enlightenments and their consequences for the present day disagreements between the EU and the US.
The original European integration project of the 40’s and the 50’s and its modifications by the post-1968 elites – critically evaluate similarities and differences and their political, economic and cultural consequences.
Critically evaluate the post-colonial model of development (core vs. periphery) as applied to the internal evolution of the European Union at the turn of the 21st century.ALL THE REQUIRMENTS ARE GIVEN BELOW BELOW IN THE FILE ….3500 WORDS ,20 REFERNCES ,ALL HARVARD STYLE ESSAY FORMAT AND HARVARD STYLE REFERNCES.EDITING RULES ARE MENTIONED
20180108195301lu49_us_eu_paper_instructions_dec_2017.docx.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
The United States and the European Union: Cultural, Political and Legal Differences
in Approach to Modernity (US_EU)
Prof. Andrzej Bryk
Sem III, Fall 2017
level VII
Written assignment for the class
The United States and the European Union: Cultural, Political and Legal Differences in Approach to
Modernity (US_EU)
(60% of the final mark)
Requirements: students are required to write a paper of around 3500 words on one of the topics
provided in the list below. The paper should have the form of a scholarly paper, with evidence, notes,
bibliography if appropriate.
Evidence & Format
Your paper has to meet all formal standards as presented in ‘IR Essay Writing Standard’ and Thesis
Manual available on student resources (zasoby) under course1 and course 2. These include:
• Requirements relating to a scholarly paper, such as providing evidence that supports your
theses, statements and claims, as well as proper referencing. Bibliography should have a
sufficient number of academic sources (at least 10 for papers of 1500 words and 20 for 2500 or
more words)
• Editing rules: title page; font, Times New Roman 12; margins, 2,5 cm; double space between
verses; italics for book/periodical titles; single quotation marks, etc. The paper must be logically
structured (introduction; the main body subdivided into paragraphs; conclusions) and meet the
minimum language standards.
• Plagiarism: be aware that anything copied without quotation marks and references is treated as
plagiarism
Digital and printed copies
Your paper has to be submitted in two versions, printed and digital. The printed version must be stapled
(handwritten papers will be dismissed). The digital version is to be in the Word format (no pdf). The docs
should have a name that include: (1) student’s last name and ID, (2) an abbreviated name of the module
and of (3) the title of your paper. For example, tkachuk_1000_US_EU_TitlePaper. Papers which do not
meet the standards above will be dismissed.
Deadline (means deadline!)
The paper must be delivered by the deadline as indicated below. Failure to deliver any version (digital
and printed) on time will lower your mark by 5% per day. If the delay is longer than 6 days, your paper
gets 0 point and you will have to submit it as a re-sit paper.
Marking scheme
20% each for: (1) for the quality of writing; (2) use of evidence; (3) quality of argument and analysis; (4)
context and facts; and (5) for use of references and citations. See below the table of assessment criteria
for details.
PAPER DUE date is January 17, 2017; paper version should be submitted by the end of our class or delay
penalty will apply on that day; electronic version can be emailed by 12:00 midnight.
Re-sit exam
A student who fails a paper (mark below 35% and the total for the coursework below 40%) writes a new
paper on a different topic. This will be a re-sit for a paper assignment. The paper must meet all the
criteria and requirements as described above. The deadline is any time prior to the scheduled re-sit
examination.
List of topics:
1.
Critically evaluate the different axiological assumptions of the European Union and the United
States in their response to the immigration crisis.
2.
Assess the ideological assumptions of the EU’s and the US’ approaches to their historical past
and their influence onto the contemporary policies by providing relevant examples.
3.
Appraise the European Union as a federal state from the perspective of its historical origins,
ideological assumptions and critical assessment of the project.
4.
Explain the different assumptions of the European Union as the first post-political project and
the American defense of a political nation state. Provide a critical assessment of their
consequences.
5.
Explain (by means of a critical assessment) the differences between the American and the
European Enlightenments and their consequences for the present day disagreements between
the EU and the US.
6.
The original European integration project of the 40’s and the 50’s and its modifications by the
post-1968 elites – critically evaluate similarities and differences and their political, economic
and cultural consequences.
7.
Critically evaluate the post-colonial model of development (core vs. periphery) as applied to the
internal evolution of the European Union at the turn of the 21st century.
The paper is assessed according to the following criteria:
0-4 %
Very poor,
problems
with
grammar,
structure and
coherence
Poor use of
sources,
quotes not
relevant; do
not advance
or support
the argument
5-9 %
Weak,
problems with
paragraphs
and structure
10-14 %
Sufficient,
understandable
with slight
mistakes
15-17 %
Very good
18-20 %
Excellent,
publishable
Weak use of
sources;
ineffective use
of quotes;
weak and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing
Sources used
are relevant,
quotes and
paraphrasing
support the
argument
Outstanding,
well
documented,
very good use
of quotes and
effective
paraphrasing
Quality of
argument
and analysis
Poor, no clear
arguments,
confusing; no
attempt at
analysis
Context and
factual issue
Very poor in
terms of facts
and context;
descriptive,
not
supporting
analysis
Sufficient
arguments,
some small
problems in
either clarity or
effectiveness
Sufficient use of
the material
with only slight
errors of fact;
supportive of
argument
Effective use
of the material
with no factual
errors; context
supports
argument
Complete
understanding
of the
material, with
no factual
errors
References,
citations and
bibliography
Very poor,
not properly
done
Weak;
arguments
used rather
ineffectively;
little attempt
at analysis
Weak in terms
of use of
context; often
descriptive;
does not
support or
advance
argument
Rather weak,
clear errors in
style and form
Very good use
of quotes and
effective
paraphrasing ,
sources
advance the
argument
being made
Clear. effective
analysis, with
little or no
problems with
clarity
No errors in
form or use
Excellent and
effective;
references
advance
arguments
Quality of
writing
Use of
evidence
Additional remarks:
Adequately
done with
minor errors
Outstanding,
very clear and
very
persuasive
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades