Expert answer:Paper 2PHIL3127 Fall 2017Prof. KleinLength: 7 pages (1-inch margins, page numbers, name and title on page 1.)Due in class on Friday, December 1. (Hardcopy and T-square.) News Coverage of Similar Events (Election Interference)In Manufacturing Consent (2002) Edward Herman & Noam Chomsky (H&C) claim that “…the Media serve, and propagandize on behalf of, the powerful societal interests that control and finance them.” In the spirit of the Enlightenment, let’s critically examine that claim. Let’s neither blindly accept it nor blindly reject it. Rather, let’s collect facts and apply logic and draw our own conclusions. Does a methodologically rigorous analysis of the facts support the claim of media bias i.e. of “shadows on the cave wall”? In this paper you will apply Herman and Chomsky’s paired case study method to two (alleged) events: 1. US interference in the Russian election of 1996 2. Russian interference in the US election of 2016.For background on the 1996 election, you can read Wikipedia :• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_presidential…A selection of the relevant newspaper articles are available as PDF files on T-square, at RESOURCES->Paper 2. (Do not print these files, as they are rather large!)In your paper you should first summarize the Propaganda Model and the paired case study method. This summary may be up to a third of your paper. Then you should perform both quantitative and qualitative analysis on the articles, as illustrated in H&C Chapters 2 and 3 (esp. Table 2.1.) Note that there is too much news coverage to read each article in detail. So you must use some methods to reduce the data. Here are a few suggestions:• Read all headlines • Read most opening paragraphs• For the most promising articles, read the full body • Identify key terms and use the search function to count those termsTell the reader whether the data 1) strongly supports or 2) strongly refutes or 3) weakly supports or 4) weakly refutes or 5) allows no conclusion for the Propaganda Model. You might conclude the paper by relating this particular research to larger questions of illusion and freedom, false consciousness, or “The Matrix”. In writing the paper you may discuss the cases with colleagues, but you must author the paper alone.Use the American Psychological Association (APA) style: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/1/
paper_2_fall_17.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Paper 2
PHIL3127
Fall 2017
Prof. Klein
Length: 7 pages (1-inch margins, page numbers, name and title on page 1.)
Due in class on Friday, December 1. (Hardcopy and T-square.)
News Coverage of Similar Events (Election Interference)
In Manufacturing Consent (2002) Edward Herman & Noam Chomsky (H&C) claim that
“…the Media serve, and propagandize on behalf of, the powerful societal interests that
control and finance them.”
In the spirit of the Enlightenment, let’s critically examine that claim. Let’s
neither blindly accept it nor blindly reject it. Rather, let’s collect facts and apply logic
and draw our own conclusions. Does a methodologically rigorous analysis of the facts
support the claim of media bias i.e. of “shadows on the cave wall”?
In this paper you will apply Herman and Chomsky’s paired case study method to
two (alleged) events:
1. US interference in the Russian election of 1996
2. Russian interference in the US election of 2016.
For background on the 1996 election, you can read Wikipedia :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_presidential_election,_1996
A selection of the relevant newspaper articles are available as PDF files on T-square, at
RESOURCES->Paper 2. (Do not print these files, as they are rather large!)
In your paper you should first summarize the Propaganda Model and the paired case
study method. This summary may be up to a third of your paper. Then you should
perform both quantitative and qualitative analysis on the articles, as illustrated in H&C
Chapters 2 and 3 (esp. Table 2.1.)
Note that there is too much news coverage to read each article in detail. So you
must use some methods to reduce the data. Here are a few suggestions:
Read all headlines
Read most opening paragraphs
For the most promising articles, read the full body
Identify key terms and use the search function to count those terms
Tell the reader whether the data 1) strongly supports or 2) strongly refutes or 3) weakly
supports or 4) weakly refutes or 5) allows no conclusion for the Propaganda Model. You
might conclude the paper by relating this particular research to larger questions of
illusion and freedom, false consciousness, or “The Matrix”.
In writing the paper you may discuss the cases with colleagues, but you must
author the paper alone.
Use the American Psychological Association (APA) style:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/1/
###
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more