Expert answer:On Site Child Care Services

Expert answer:As seen in the Learning Activities, conducting research can be a time-intensive process. However, there are various methods that may help you conduct research more efficiently. This evidence can be categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources. Primary research is based on first-hand observations and interpretations; in secondary research, you have to rely on another writer’s ability to find and analyze information. Tertiary sources like encyclopedias and bibliographies offer overviews of a topic. It is ideal to have a research strategy or plan in place before jumping into looking for sources. In this Discussion, you will build your research strategy.After completing the unit’s Learning Activities, respond to the following questions in at least two well-developed paragraphs:Include the revised version of your thesis statement for an argument for change in your community or workplace, and identify at least three search terms you can use in the Library or an Internet search engine to find sources to support that thesis statement.Find one source related to your topic. Is that source primary, secondary, or tertiary? What criteria will help you decide if this source is credible and useful for your research?Finally, create an APA formatted References page citation for the source.To earn full participation credit, you will need to respond substantively to at least two peers’ initial Discussion posts and show active engagement in the discussion as described in the grading rubric. These responses should stay on topic and generate further discussion by asking questions, mentioning relevant examples, and referencing concepts from the unit’s Learning Activities.All Discussion posts and responses to peers should be written in complete sentences using Standard American English. Before posting, proofread for grammar, spelling, and word-choice issues. Be sure to respond fully to every aspect of the Discussion.When you refer to concepts from the unit’s Learning Activities, be sure to use a signal phrase like “According to . . .[name of reading].” If you are directly quoting the Learning Activities or another source, be sure to use quotation marks and cite the source using proper APA in-text citations and full references. The Writing Center has resources on APA citation formatting.https://kucampus.kaplan.edu/MyStudies/AcademicSupportCenter/WritingCenter/WritingReferenceLibrary/ResearchCitationAndPlagiarism/Index.aspxYou can review a sample Discussion post and response to a peer by clicking on the following link: Unit 5 Sample Discussion Assignment.You can review the rubric the instructor will use when determining your Discussion grade by clicking on the following link: Discussion Assignment Grading Rubric. MY rEVISED THESESRunning head: ON-SITE CHILD CARE SERVICES On-Site Child Care ServicesAshley RichKaplan University 11/14/17 On-Site Child Care ServicesOverview Despite the numerous opinions regarding what an argument entails, the one that can apply accurately in this scenario is an academic argument. In this case, one has an opinion or an issue that he/she raises and supports it sufficiently. However, in order to make it appeal to many people, it is imperative for one to support it through facts, emotional appeals, and logical reasoning among other ways. Hence, it will translate to raising a general or specific issue and going ahead to justify one’s position. In this respect, the argument will contain the author’s position which contains a claim and the backing content to validate its viewpoint. Part IRevised ThesisI revised my thesis by taking into account various factors. Firstly, it is essential for it to have a clear claim even to the ones who have no idea about the topic of discussion. Secondly, even if the reader does not agree with any of the inferences made, there will be no challenge in understanding the claim, the warrant, and my position as well. Thirdly, and as highlighted in the Clements’ podcast, the claim forms the first part of the thesis. Regarding that, it is the principal part, and other sections follow.Thesis: Employers should provide an on-site child care services to employees since it saves time and encourages employees with difficulties in finding affordable child care services.The claim: Employers should provide an on-site child care services to employees.Reason: it saves time and encourages employees with difficulties in finding affordable child care services.Evidently, different from the case of the previous thesis, this one has considered the value of connecting the parts using the conjunction “since.” As a result, the reader can immediately understand the claim and the assumption that is in the thesis after reading it once. More so, such a structure forms the basis of the part that requires more evidence to justify the claim made. In particular, the use of “since” as opposed to the previous case shows the reason why the claim is made. Therefore, it is a primary part of the justifications needed.However, it is vital to note that one can include more than one reason, which may not be related as well. As evident in this case, the issue of time-saving is part of the justification that the claim makes. Furthermore, the provision of on-site child care services is a way to encourage employees with difficulties to find such but affordable care services. Type of claimEvidently, the type of claim is a proposal. In many argumentative settings, the author of an argument usually has a basic idea regarding what he/she wants the readers to get. In this case, the use of “should” in the claim manifests that something is not being done. More so, it can depict a necessity that requires immediate intervention. In fact, it is more of a call than a suggestion to change the current situation for the betterment of what is available regarding the child care services that employees get from their employers.Part II: Use of AppealsIn a way to support and justify my claim, I would use all the appeals that validate an argument as long as they will be applicable. My ethos will primarily be focused on what I understand about efficient child care as a critical need. In a way to show its necessity, I would analyze the consequences in a scenario where it is not present. Therefore, the ones going through my argument will see the other side hence understand why it is important to have it. More so, the use of ethos will provide a basis for using other appeals. The main consideration to make is that each has its strengths and weaknesses, and it is impossible to use one across all situations. Indeed, different cases call for different emotional appeals.In its case pathos can also apply to this argument. In fact, its use will form a significant part as well. Different from the case of ethos that applies ethical appeals, pathos applies emotional appeal. Thus, one feels connected to what the author of the argument claims and it is through the words that someone chooses that makes it possible to achieve it. For instance, just as in the case of ethos, the presentation of the other side where child care is lacking can work quite well. Indeed, it will be a way of capturing the feelings of others so that they conform to your thoughts. However, the greater part of the argument will consider the use of logos. In fact, even if it is practical to apply ethos and pathos, the kind of argument, in this case, will be better if logos are dominant. The primary reason for this supposition is that logos use logical reasoning. More so, apart from using one’s point of view, it is still possible to use others to present the case. In this regard, one is not confined to the use of primary data or observation to make a claim. Therefore, the use of secondary research is allowed as long as it is credible and sensible. Logos My argument is guided by three research questions. The first one is an evaluation regarding the impact of onsite childcare services on employee turnover. Secondly, it examines whether the services should be made a deductible business expense for all employees. Thirdly, it seeks to provide details about the costs and benefits of implementing the service. In particular, the third part looks at the pros and cons of having the service to both organization and the employees. If one closely examines these questions and the answers they seek to get, it is imperative to use logical reasoning and support the case by facts as opposed to ethical appeal or pathos which might lack supporting evidence. In connection, use of facts will come in different but closely related ways. Importantly, I will factor using effective communication skills so that everyone understands the critical need for on-site child care services. As one of the cases to argue about, it is crucial for mothers since it gives them a relief and comfort; they can know that their children are within and can check-in at their convenient time. Apart from the fact, the argument will extend to give the reason and why the point is justified. Like for the case above, the provision of onsite childcare services is a way to increase mothers’ concentration at work and provides them with flexible schedules hence high productivity (Davis, 2011). The inclusion of the author and the date shows that it is not just an opinion but research work; in fact, this makes the hypothesis made to be credible. Another point that shows logical reasoning is that apart from the mothers, provision of on-site child care services is also important to the organization. Apparently, it is one way towards a high job turnover since the employees become more productive, which undoubtedly makes an organization to grow. In connection, it influences the employees’ productivity, and they get more involved in their work (Lein, 2008). Through such facts, my colleagues will get a conviction thatthe argument is valid and needs to be considered as well.Part III: Parts of the ArgumentClaim: Employers should provide an on-site child care services to employees. This sentence carries my point and foundation of my argument. In fact, the use of “should” shows something has been missing and requires immediate address if possible. Warrant (assumption): If employers do not provide on-site child care services to employees, it can’t save time and can’t encourage employees with difficulties in finding affordable child care services.The assumption here is that the opposite of the scenario would happen. As such, the benefits that come along with the provision of onsite child care services would miss if it is not provided.Qualifiers: One thing with the argument is that the claim is very valid; provision of on-site child care services to employees will no doubt change the situation. However, there is an assumption in that it is a way to save time as well as encouraging employees to with difficulties to find affordable child care services. “Current” on-set child care services- the use of “current” as a qualifier can be considered since it is not all onsite child care services that can improve the current situation. Regarding that, it will make a claim more specific.“Some” employees: This is another qualifier that can remove generality. Indeed, it is an over assumption to think that all employees use or benefit from it. Grounds: Primarily, the case argument will use facts/research evidence to validate the claim. Indeed, the ones present at this point as case examples is its input to the mothers and organizations.To the mothers, “it gives them a relief and comfort to know that their children are within and they can check-in at any time.”To the organizations, “it will be important because of the high job turnover.”Backing (for the warrant):Every employer should initiate an on-site childcare service. Reason being, without it one cannot increase the employee turnover by 5%. In this respect, before assuming that the provision of on-site services improves productivity, it is already proven that there is a significant increase (5%) in the current turnover. As a result, the percentage becomes the reference point and the backing supposition as well.Rebuttals: On-site childcare services are also costly despite the benefit of productivity. There are also issues regarding security hence it is not exclusively beneficial as it sounds. With that in mind, it is also important to examine these issues in depth, and present the case in its exactness while avoiding generalities. Logical fallacies and how to avoid themAd Ignorantum: This is the assumption that something is true since there is no research on its other side. In this regard, there is no proof about its falsehoods. I will avoid this fallacy by evading the use of many general points that lack research backup as well. Moreover, I will highlight on the refuting claim and the various viewpoints about the same.Hasty generalization: This one makes an argument look like a story instead of a valid point of view. Indeed, it looks more like someone’s thought as opposed to researched work. In response, I will avoid it by being specific and using only the proven research information/facts. ReferencesDavis, D. L. (2011). Differences in job stress, role conflict, and child care satisfaction of working nurses who utilize employer-sponsored onsite versus at-large child careservices. N.p.: n.d.Lein, L. (2008). Child Care Services. Encyclopedia of Social Work. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.48Tribe Benefits from Coordination of Child Care Services. (n.d.). PsycEXTRA Dataset. doi:10.1037/e303422003-009

How it works

1. Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
2. Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions 
3. Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
4.  Download the paper after the writer uploads it 

Will the writer plagiarize my essay?

You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.

Is this service safe?

All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades