Expert answer:I want to help me for this assignment.?
Expert answer:In assignment W3 you analyzed the characters and team dynamics in the clip from Twelve Angry Men. In this assignment, you will work in your teams to identify dysfunctional behaviors and proposed facilitation strategies to overcome them using exercise 13-C.Use your team’s Canvas group discussion to conduct your work. Once the group effort is complete, one member will submit the team’s conclusion directly in this assignment.Link to clip from film is:the movie is 12 angry men – The duration of the film 22.55and you can see the files.
screen_shot_2017_11_25_at_1.06.01_am.png
c1__team_s.pdf
module_6_c1___exercise_13_c__team_video_case_study_____12_angry_men.pdf
team_video_case_rubric_1.pdf
c1__team_s.pdf
module_6_c1___exercise_13_c__team_video_case_study_____12_angry_men.pdf
team_video_case_rubric_1.pdf
ch_13_ilovepdf_compressed.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Do we want to use the same format and add to each behavior then we can consolidate and place the information within the grid?
Hey Guys, I can add my contributions by tomorrow, unfortunately, not until late afternoon. I can check back in around 7pm (PST),
which would make it 9pm KS time. Also, I will be around in the morning on Thursday, and if need be, I can submit our assignment
then. I will try my hardest to contribute earlier in the day tomorrow though. Malissa.
Whisperer Juror #12 shows his Rice Pops about his company to the person next to him.
Eager Beaver
Heckler/complainer
Silent member Juror #5 passes when it’s his turn to share his thoughts.
Sidetracker Juror #9 wants to talk about a story for the hour they are staying before the game.
Fighter Juror #6 (the man at the end of the table). Defends himself because he voted quickly for a boy to be accused guilty and
does not want to talk through it.
Stand pat Juror #7 (the not guilty one). Although, he is open to hearing the opposing side and different views.
Juror #6 states they can be there as long as they want but the boy will still be guilty.
Verbal stumbler Juror #1 is unable to put into words why he thinks the boy is guilty.
Early leaver
Module 6 C1: (Exercise 13C) Team Video Case Study – 12 Angry Men
Behavior
Whisperer periodically engages team
member(s) in side conversations
“Eager beaver” (talker/monopolizer)
always has something to say
Heckler/complainer combative; tells
team members why what they’re working
on will never work
Silent member withdrawn; doesn’t
participate
Sidetracker discusses items not on the
agenda
Fighter picks a “fight” and/or argues with
another team member
“Stand pat” won’t budge; hostile;
unwilling to look at situation from others’
perspective; often prejudiced
Verbal stumbler unable to express self
clearly
Actor/Evidence
Strategy Used or Suggested
Early leaver announces they must leave
for another activity
11/25/2017
Module 6 C1: (Exercise 13-C) Team Video Case Study – 12 Angry Men
Module 6 C1: (Exercise 13‐C) Team Video Case Study – 12
Angry Men
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 200
Submitting a file upload
In assignment W3 you analyzed the characters and team dynamics in the clip from Twelve Angry Men. In this
assignment, you will work in your teams to identify dysfunctional behaviors and proposed facilitation
strategies to overcome them using exercise 13C.
Use your team’s Canvas group discussion to conduct your work. Once the group effort is complete, one
member will submit the team’s conclusion directly in this assignment.
Link to clip from film is:
12 Angry Men
Rubric: Team Video Case Grading Rubric
https://avila.instructure.com/courses/729050/assignments/7591706
1/1
Team Video Case Rubric
Criteria
Developing
(75%)
Competent
(85%)
Accomplished
(100%)
Group Criterion:
0 percent
Punctuation, Spelling, The team report had
and Grammar
excessive errors in
(10% Weighting)
punctuation, spelling,
and grammar.
8 percent
The final team report
contained some typical
errors in punctuation,
spelling, or grammar but
overall, writing is correct.
9 percent
The final team report
contained no
grammatical errors.
There may have been a
few errors in punctuation
or spelling. Overall,
writing is correct.
10 percent
The final team report
contained no errors in
punctuation, spelling, and
grammar.
Group Criterion:
Organization & Style
(10% Weighting)
8 percent
Connections between
sentences are evident but
lacks command of word
choices.
Group Criterion:
Support
(20% Weighting)
Unacceptable
(0%)
0 percent
Writing rambles with
no structure or style
that shows clearly
what the group’s
conclusions are.
9 percent
10 percent
The final team report is
The final team report is
organized. Sentence engaging and well organized
transitions are evident. from beginning to end. Easy
Most word choices add to follow the thought process
to style.
and arguments of the group.
0 percent
15 percent
17 percent
20 percent
The report does not
The report has minimal
The report has adequate
The report cites sources
reference sources.
support to arguments and citations and reasonable from the text and references
Cannot tell where
some depth to conclusions. support to conclusions.
other outside sources.
ideas come from. May
Supports specific ideas or
have some evidence
conclusions with depth.
of plagiarism.
Page 1 of 2
Individual Criterion:
Timeliness,
Participation, and
Persistence
(30% Weighting)
Individual Criterion:
Understanding of the
activity as
demonstrated by
critical thinking,
problem solving, and
argumentation
(25% Weighting)
(30% Weighting)
0 percent
23 percent
The student did not
The student contributed to
participate in the team the team shared document
shared document.
but was too late in the week
to allow for collaboration.
26 percent
30 percent
The student created a
The student created new
new entry and added
ideas and added comments
comments to the team
to the team shared
shared document, all
document, all within the
within the expected
expected timeframe of the
timeframe of the lesson. lesson. The student showed
depth and persistence in
exploring the topic or
concept.
0 percent
23 percent
26 percent
0 percent
The student’s contribution to
The student’s
The student’s
the shared document
contribution to the
contribution to the
demonstrates a developing
shared document
shared document is understanding of concepts,
demonstrates an
superficial and
but the student response
understanding of the
demonstrates very
lacks critical thinking or
concept being
little to no
argumentation; does little to presented. The student
understanding of the move the meter on problem develops a position or
concept.
solving.
solution and supports it.
30 percent
The student’s contribution to
the shared document
demonstrates a thorough
understanding of the
concept being presented.
Student connects concepts,
applies concepts, creates
new solutions, and supports
position.
Page 2 of 2
Do we want to use the same format and add to each behavior then we can consolidate and place the information within the grid?
Hey Guys, I can add my contributions by tomorrow, unfortunately, not until late afternoon. I can check back in around 7pm (PST),
which would make it 9pm KS time. Also, I will be around in the morning on Thursday, and if need be, I can submit our assignment
then. I will try my hardest to contribute earlier in the day tomorrow though. Malissa.
Whisperer Juror #12 shows his Rice Pops about his company to the person next to him.
Eager Beaver
Heckler/complainer
Silent member Juror #5 passes when it’s his turn to share his thoughts.
Sidetracker Juror #9 wants to talk about a story for the hour they are staying before the game.
Fighter Juror #6 (the man at the end of the table). Defends himself because he voted quickly for a boy to be accused guilty and
does not want to talk through it.
Stand pat Juror #7 (the not guilty one). Although, he is open to hearing the opposing side and different views.
Juror #6 states they can be there as long as they want but the boy will still be guilty.
Verbal stumbler Juror #1 is unable to put into words why he thinks the boy is guilty.
Early leaver
Module 6 C1: (Exercise 13C) Team Video Case Study – 12 Angry Men
Behavior
Whisperer periodically engages team
member(s) in side conversations
“Eager beaver” (talker/monopolizer)
always has something to say
Heckler/complainer combative; tells
team members why what they’re working
on will never work
Silent member withdrawn; doesn’t
participate
Sidetracker discusses items not on the
agenda
Fighter picks a “fight” and/or argues with
another team member
“Stand pat” won’t budge; hostile;
unwilling to look at situation from others’
perspective; often prejudiced
Verbal stumbler unable to express self
clearly
Actor/Evidence
Strategy Used or Suggested
Early leaver announces they must leave
for another activity
11/25/2017
Module 6 C1: (Exercise 13-C) Team Video Case Study – 12 Angry Men
Module 6 C1: (Exercise 13‐C) Team Video Case Study – 12
Angry Men
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 200
Submitting a file upload
In assignment W3 you analyzed the characters and team dynamics in the clip from Twelve Angry Men. In this
assignment, you will work in your teams to identify dysfunctional behaviors and proposed facilitation
strategies to overcome them using exercise 13C.
Use your team’s Canvas group discussion to conduct your work. Once the group effort is complete, one
member will submit the team’s conclusion directly in this assignment.
Link to clip from film is:
12 Angry Men
Rubric: Team Video Case Grading Rubric
https://avila.instructure.com/courses/729050/assignments/7591706
1/1
Team Video Case Rubric
Criteria
Developing
(75%)
Competent
(85%)
Accomplished
(100%)
Group Criterion:
0 percent
Punctuation, Spelling, The team report had
and Grammar
excessive errors in
(10% Weighting)
punctuation, spelling,
and grammar.
8 percent
The final team report
contained some typical
errors in punctuation,
spelling, or grammar but
overall, writing is correct.
9 percent
The final team report
contained no
grammatical errors.
There may have been a
few errors in punctuation
or spelling. Overall,
writing is correct.
10 percent
The final team report
contained no errors in
punctuation, spelling, and
grammar.
Group Criterion:
Organization & Style
(10% Weighting)
8 percent
Connections between
sentences are evident but
lacks command of word
choices.
Group Criterion:
Support
(20% Weighting)
Unacceptable
(0%)
0 percent
Writing rambles with
no structure or style
that shows clearly
what the group’s
conclusions are.
9 percent
10 percent
The final team report is
The final team report is
organized. Sentence engaging and well organized
transitions are evident. from beginning to end. Easy
Most word choices add to follow the thought process
to style.
and arguments of the group.
0 percent
15 percent
17 percent
20 percent
The report does not
The report has minimal
The report has adequate
The report cites sources
reference sources.
support to arguments and citations and reasonable from the text and references
Cannot tell where
some depth to conclusions. support to conclusions.
other outside sources.
ideas come from. May
Supports specific ideas or
have some evidence
conclusions with depth.
of plagiarism.
Page 1 of 2
Individual Criterion:
Timeliness,
Participation, and
Persistence
(30% Weighting)
Individual Criterion:
Understanding of the
activity as
demonstrated by
critical thinking,
problem solving, and
argumentation
(25% Weighting)
(30% Weighting)
0 percent
23 percent
The student did not
The student contributed to
participate in the team the team shared document
shared document.
but was too late in the week
to allow for collaboration.
26 percent
30 percent
The student created a
The student created new
new entry and added
ideas and added comments
comments to the team
to the team shared
shared document, all
document, all within the
within the expected
expected timeframe of the
timeframe of the lesson. lesson. The student showed
depth and persistence in
exploring the topic or
concept.
0 percent
23 percent
26 percent
0 percent
The student’s contribution to
The student’s
The student’s
the shared document
contribution to the
contribution to the
demonstrates a developing
shared document
shared document is understanding of concepts,
demonstrates an
superficial and
but the student response
understanding of the
demonstrates very
lacks critical thinking or
concept being
little to no
argumentation; does little to presented. The student
understanding of the move the meter on problem develops a position or
concept.
solving.
solution and supports it.
30 percent
The student’s contribution to
the shared document
demonstrates a thorough
understanding of the
concept being presented.
Student connects concepts,
applies concepts, creates
new solutions, and supports
position.
Page 2 of 2
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades