Expert answer:Evidence based practice
Expert answer:Please
use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each
section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could
become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each
element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the
rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction
and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions
regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course
Help forum.The final project presents a culmination of nursing research and
evidence-based practice (EBP)knowledge as students choose a qualitative
or quantitative study to critically evaluate, including making a
recommendation for utilization in EBP. In a 5 page paper (excluding title page and references), critically
evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4, which can be found in the Module 7
Overview. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research
design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on
how this study contributes to EBP. Use the Final Project Rubric
provided below to help you develop and organize your final paper.
Please remember to follow APA 6th edition formatting for the title page,
body of the paper, and reference page. Rubric or Grading Criteria:
Competency
10.5 points
6 points
4 points
0 points
Total
Evaluates credibility of research article the components of the appropriate evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
Evaluates credibility of research article using most of the
components (Greater than 2/3) of the evaluation checklist in Houser
(2018).
Evaluates credibility of research article using 2/3 of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).
Evaluates credibility of research article using one-third or less of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
No paper submitted, content missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the problem statement and research design using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
Evaluates the problem statement and research design using most of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).
Evaluates the problem statement and research design using half of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).
Evaluates the problem statement and research design using one-third or less of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).
No paper submitted, content missing.
/10.5
Evaluates ethical issues in the study using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical issues in the study using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical issues in the study using half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical issues in the study using one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).
No paper submitted, content missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the purpose statement using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
Evaluates the purpose statement using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
Evaluates the purpose statement using half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
Evaluates the purpose statement using one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
No paper submitted, content missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the literature review using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
Evaluates the literature review using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
Evaluates the literature review using half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
Evaluates the literature review using one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)
No paper submitted, content missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the sampling strategy using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).
Evaluates the sampling strategy using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).
Evaluates the sampling strategy using half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).
Evaluates the sampling strategy using one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).
No paper submitted, or content missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative
studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the checklist components in Houser (2018).
Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)OR. Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most
of the components in the checklist components in Houser (2018).
Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using half of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using half of the components of the checklist in Houser (2018).
Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using one-third of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). OREvaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using
one-third or less of the components of the checklist in Houser (2018).
No paper submitted, content missing.
/10.5
Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP.
Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP.
Discusses study results in general but not how findings may or may not contribute to EBP.
Does not discuss results or how study findings can inform EBP.
No paper submitted or content missing
/10.5
Competency
7 points
5 points
2.5 points
0 points
APA format
Demonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA
Minimal APA errorsTwo unique errors i.e. abbreviations and in text citation
Many APA errorsMore than two APA errors
Complete lack of understanding APA format
/7
Competency
3 points
2 points
1 points
0 points
Organization
Organization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic.
Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support
Organization minimally effective; problems in approach, sequence, support and transitions
Organization does not meet requirements
/3
Grammar
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good mostly consistent
with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or
understanding
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage distracting and often interfere with meaning or understanding
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage interfere with understanding
/3
References
References are relevant, authoritative and contemporary
Adequate references
Minimal use of appropriate references
Poor use and/or selection of references not relevant
/3
Total Possible = 100
/100
bsn_422_final_project.doc.docx
bsn_422_final_project.doc.docx
bsn_422_final_project.doc.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the
rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your
assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of
your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an
introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding
the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.
The final project presents a culmination of nursing research and evidence-based practice
(EBP)knowledge as students choose a qualitative or quantitative study to critically evaluate,
including making a recommendation for utilization in EBP.
In a 5 page paper (excluding title page and references), critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study
4, which can be found in the Module 7 Overview. Evaluate the credibility of professional
citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this
study contributes to EBP. Use the Final Project Rubric provided below to help you develop and
organize your final paper. Please remember to follow APA 6th edition formatting for the title
page, body of the paper, and reference page.
Rubric or Grading Criteria:
Competency
10.5 points
6 points
4 points
0 points
Total
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
the
components of
the appropriate
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using most of
the
components
(Greater than
2/3) of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using 2/3 of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using one-third or
less of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018)
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research
design using
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research
design using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research
design using
half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
problem statement
and research design
using one-third or
less of the
evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates
ethical issues
Evaluates
ethical issues
Evaluates
ethical issues
Evaluates ethical
issues in the study
No paper
submitted,
/10.5
in the study
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
in the study
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
in the study
using half of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
using one-third or content
less of
missing.
the components of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
purpose
statement
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement
using half of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose statement
using one-third or
less of
the components of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018)
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
literature
review using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature
review using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature
review using
half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature
review using onethird or less of the
components of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018)
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
sampling strategy
using one-third or
less of the
components of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
No paper
submitted, or
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
half of the
evaluation
checklist in
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative studies
using one-third of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Houser
(2018).
OR.
Houser
(2018).
OR
Evaluates
OR
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
Evaluates
trustworthiness studies using
most of the
of data in
components in
qualitative
studies using the checklist
components in
most of the
Houser
checklist
components in (2018).
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates
OR
trustworthiness of
data in qualitative
studies using oneEvaluates
trustworthiness third or less of the
components of
of data in
the checklist in
qualitative
studies using Houser (2018).
half of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates how
study results
may (or may
not) be used to
inform EBP.
Evaluates how
study results
may (or may
not) be used to
inform EBP.
Discusses
study results in
general but not
how findings
may or may
not contribute
to EBP.
Does not discuss
results or how
study findings can
inform EBP.
No paper
submitted or
content
missing
Competency
7 points
5 points
2.5 points
0 points
APA format
Demonstrates Minimal APA Many APA errors
competent use errors
of mechanics
More than two
and APA
Two unique
APA errors
errors i.e.
abbreviations
and in text
citation
Complete
/7
lack of
understanding
APA format
Competency
3 points
2 points
1 points
0 points
Organization
Organization
excellent,
ideas clear and
arranged
logically,
transitions
smooth, no
flaws in logic.
Organization
good; ideas
usually clear
and arranged
in acceptable
sequence;
transitions
usually
smooth, good
support
Organization
Organization /3
minimally
does not meet
effective; problems requirements
in approach,
sequence, support
and transitions
/10.5
Grammar
Grammar,
punctuation,
mechanics,
and usage
correct and
idiomatic,
consistent with
Standard
American
English
Grammar,
punctuation,
mechanics,
and usage
good mostly
consistent with
Standard
American
English; errors
do not
interfere with
meaning or
understanding
References
References are Adequate
relevant,
references
authoritative
and
contemporary
Grammar,
punctuation,
mechanics and
usage
distracting and
often interfere with
meaning or
understanding
Grammar,
/3
punctuation,
mechanics,
and usage
interfere with
understanding
Minimal use of
appropriate
references
Poor use
/3
and/or
selection of
references not
relevant
Total Possible = 100
/100
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the
rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your
assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of
your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an
introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding
the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.
The final project presents a culmination of nursing research and evidence-based practice
(EBP)knowledge as students choose a qualitative or quantitative study to critically evaluate,
including making a recommendation for utilization in EBP.
In a 5 page paper (excluding title page and references), critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study
4, which can be found in the Module 7 Overview. Evaluate the credibility of professional
citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this
study contributes to EBP. Use the Final Project Rubric provided below to help you develop and
organize your final paper. Please remember to follow APA 6th edition formatting for the title
page, body of the paper, and reference page.
Rubric or Grading Criteria:
Competency
10.5 points
6 points
4 points
0 points
Total
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
the
components of
the appropriate
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using most of
the
components
(Greater than
2/3) of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using 2/3 of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using one-third or
less of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018)
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research
design using
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research
design using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research
design using
half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
problem statement
and research design
using one-third or
less of the
evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates
ethical issues
Evaluates
ethical issues
Evaluates
ethical issues
Evaluates ethical
issues in the study
No paper
submitted,
/10.5
in the study
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
in the study
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
in the study
using half of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
using one-third or content
less of
missing.
the components of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
purpose
statement
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement
using half of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose statement
using one-third or
less of
the components of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018)
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
literature
review using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature
review using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature
review using
half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature
review using onethird or less of the
components of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018)
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
sampling strategy
using one-third or
less of the
components of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
No paper
submitted, or
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
half of the
evaluation
checklist in
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative studies
using one-third of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Houser
(2018).
OR.
Houser
(2018).
OR
Evaluates
OR
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
Evaluates
trustworthiness studies using
most of the
of data in
components in
qualitative
studies using the checklist
components in
most of the
Houser
checklist
components in (2018).
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates
OR
trustworthiness of
data in qualitative
studies using oneEvaluates
trustworthiness third or less of the
components of
of data in
the checklist in
qualitative
studies using Houser (2018).
half of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates how
study results
may (or may
not) be used to
inform EBP.
Evaluates how
study results
may (or may
not) be used to
inform EBP.
Discusses
study results in
general but not
how findings
may or may
not contribute
to EBP.
Does not discuss
results or how
study findings can
inform EBP.
No paper
submitted or
content
missing
Competency
7 points
5 points
2.5 points
0 points
APA format
Demonstrates Minimal APA Many APA errors
competent use errors
of mechanics
More than two
and APA
Two unique
APA errors
errors i.e.
abbreviations
and in text
citation
Complete
/7
lack of
understanding
APA format
Competency
3 points
2 points
1 points
0 points
Organization
Organization
excellent,
ideas clear and
arranged
logically,
transitions
smooth, no
flaws in logic.
Organization
good; ideas
usually clear
and arranged
in acceptable
sequence;
transitions
usually
smooth, good
support
Organization
Organization /3
minimally
does not meet
effective; problems requirements
in approach,
sequence, support
and transitions
/10.5
Grammar
Grammar,
punctuation,
mechanics,
and usage
correct and
idiomatic,
consistent with
Standard
American
English
Grammar,
punctuation,
mechanics,
and usage
good mostly
consistent with
Standard
American
English; errors
do not
interfere with
meaning or
understanding
References
References are Adequate
relevant,
references
authoritative
and
contemporary
Grammar,
punctuation,
mechanics and
usage
distracting and
often interfere with
meaning or
understanding
Grammar,
/3
punctuation,
mechanics,
and usage
interfere with
understanding
Minimal use of
appropriate
references
Poor use
/3
and/or
selection of
references not
relevant
Total Possible = 100
/100
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the
rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your
assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of
your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an
introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding
the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.
The final project presents a culmination of nursing research and evidence-based practice
(EBP)knowledge as students choose a qualitative or quantitative study to critically evaluate,
including making a recommendation for utilization in EBP.
In a 5 page paper (excluding title page and references), critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study
4, which can be found in the Module 7 Overview. Evaluate the credibility of professional
citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this
study contributes to EBP. Use the Final Project Rubric provided below to help you develop and
organize your final paper. Please remember to follow APA 6th edition formatting for the title
page, body of the paper, and reference page.
Rubric or Grading Criteria:
Competency
10.5 points
6 points
4 points
0 points
Total
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
the
components of
the appropriate
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using most of
the
components
(Greater than
2/3) of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using 2/3 of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using one-third or
less of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018)
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research
design using
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research
design using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research
design using
half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
problem statement
and research design
using one-third or
less of the
evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates
ethical issues
Evaluates
ethical issues
Evaluates
ethical issues
Evaluates ethical
issues in the study
No paper
submitted,
/10.5
in the study
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
in the study
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
in the study
using half of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
using one-third or content
less of
missing.
the components of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
purpose
statement
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement
using most of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement
using half of
the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose statement
using one-third or
less of
the components of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018)
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
literature
review using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature
review using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature
review using
half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature
review using onethird or less of the
components of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018)
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
most of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
sampling strategy
using one-third or
less of the
components of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
No paper
submitted, or
content
missing.
/10.5
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
half of the
evaluation
checklist in
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative studies
using one-third of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
No paper
submitted,
content
missing.
/10.5
Houser
(2018).
OR.
Houser
(2018).
OR
Evaluates
OR
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
Evaluates
trustworthiness studies using
most of the
of data in
components in
qualitative
studies using the checklist
components in
most of the
Houser
checklist
components in (2018).
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates
OR
trustworthiness of
data in qualitative
studies using oneEvaluates
trustworthiness third or less of the
components of
of data in
the checklist in
qualitative
studies using Houser (2018).
half of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser
(2018).
Evaluates how
study results
may (or may
not) be used to
inform EBP.
Evaluates how
study results
may (or may
not) be used to
inform EBP.
Discusses
study results in
general but not
how findings
may or may
not contribute
to EBP.
Does not discuss
results or …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades