Expert answer:Course Build Technology Enhancements
Expert answer:This project requires 2 tasks. Attached documents will provide extensive details for each task. Each documents is label either Task 1 or Task 2 and then the documents name. The two rubrics and the two papers submitted are attached!
20171208171250ewp_task_1.pdf
20171208171250ewp_task_2.pdf
20171208171250ewp_task_1__2_.pdf
20171208171250ewp_task_2__3_.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Evaluation Results
Requirement: Technical Communication: EWP Task 1
AUTHOR: Karen Avelino-David
DATE EVALUATED: 12/03/2017 12:31:23 PM (MST)
FINAL SCORE
DRF TEMPLATE: Technical Communication (UG, C768, EWP1-0917)
Does not Meet
PROGRAM: Technical Communication (UG, C768, EWP1-0917)
EVALUATION METHOD: Using Rubric
General comments:
Note to student-A Content Evaluator evaluated the Content requirements for this submission, while
an Articulation of Response Evaluator evaluated the Professional Communication (Articulation)
aspect.
The Professional Communication (Articulation) aspect is evaluated based on competency levels within
the four writing traits of Organization, Sentence Fluency, Word Choice and Conventions.
Competency standards are met when a pattern of pervasive writing concerns is not found within a
submission.
Please click on the pdf file attached to this evaluation to download the task, which includes
examples of the most pervasive writing concerns found within the submission. The concerns
noted appear throughout the document and must be identified and corrected before resubmitting.
Direct links from the Guide to Academic Writing Resource are also included within the examples to
assist with correcting these writing concerns throughout the work. For more information regarding
the four writing traits and assistance with addressing writing concerns, please access the Guide to
Academic Writing and contact the WGU Writing Center by clicking on the link located in the rubric
item “Professional Communication.”
Students are encouraged to schedule a live appointment with the WGU Writing Center. Student
Mentors and Course Mentors may also assist students with scheduling WGU Writing Center
appointments.
12/03/2017: Professional Communication (Articulation) – Supporting details that correlate to the
main topic enhance the work’s knowledgeable tone. Issues related to sentence fluency, conventions,
parts of speech, and word choice interrupt the flow of text.
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:51:45 AM (EST)
parts of speech, and word choice interrupt the flow of text.
12/02/2017: Content – The submission presents adequate analyses of the audiences at the
international conference and in the IT department and provides a discussion of the process of
implementing a networked hard drive. An analysis of the audience of students in the undergraduate
class, a summary of modifications to the presentation for Audience 1 to be delivered to Audience 2,
and clear procedural instructions are not readily evident. A revision of the responses to all contents
aspects is needed to meet standards.
Evaluator added files:
Karen_Avelino-David_EWP1-0917_Task1_Dec3.pdf (Adobe Acrobat
Document)
Detailed Results
(Rubric used: EWP Task 1 (0917))
A. AUDIENCE ANALYSIS
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
A description is not
The description does not
The description addresses
provided.
address the audience
the audience attributes for
attributes for each of the 3
given audiences, or it does
each of the 3 given
audiences and addresses
not address each of the
each of the given
given attributes.
attributes.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017: The submission presents adequate analyses of the audiences at the international
conference and in the IT department. A description of the attributes of Audience 2 that consist
of the students in the undergraduate online computer science class cannot be located.
B. MODIFICATIONS OF PRESENTATION
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:51:45 AM (EST)
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
A description is not
The description does not
The description adequately
provided.
adequately address how to
modify a presentation for
addresses how to modify a
presentation for the
the audience from Audience
audience from Audience 1
1 for the audience in
Audience 2, or the
for the audience in
Audience 2, and the
description does not include
description includes each o f
each of the given points.
the given points.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017: The submission describes presentation modifications when adjusting the
presentation for audience 1 to be delivered to the instructor of the online class. Summaries of
modifications of the presentation to align with the needs and attributes of the audience that
consists of the students in the online class are not readily evident.
B1. JUSTIFICATION OF MODIFYING
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
COMPETENCE
3. COMPETENT
A justification is not
provided.
The justification does not
address each modification
The justification addresses
each modification made in
made in part B, or the
modifications do not meet
part B, and the
modifications meet the
the needs of Audience 2.
needs of the audience in
Audience 2.
CRITERION SCORE:
Not Evident
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017: The Justification of Modifying aspect will be assessed once a revised descriptions
of the modifications of the presentation For audience 1 to be delivered to Audience 2 are in
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:51:45 AM (EST)
place.
C. STEP-BY-STEP INSTRUCTIONS
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
COMPETENCE
3. COMPETENT
Step-by-step instructions
are not provided.
The instructions are out of
order, or the instructions
The instructions are in
proper order, and the
are insufficiently detailed
and cannot be implemented
by the colleagues. Or the
instructions are detailed
enough to be implemented
by the colleagues. The
instructions do not include
each of the given
instructions include each o f
the given components.
components.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017: The submissions discusses the implementation of a networked hard drive. The
prerequisite and key steps are presented in a narrative that is difficult to follow by the target
audience of software developers in the IT department and multimedia elements to support the
explanation of the steps are not readily evident. Please provide clear procedural instructions
with adequate multimedia elements to meet the requirements of the task.
D. APA SOURCES
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
COMPETENCE
3. COMPETENT
The submission does not
include in-text citations and
references according to APA
style for content that is
quoted, paraphrased, or
summarized.
The submission includes intext citations and
references for content that
is quoted, paraphrased, or
summarized but does not
demonstrate a consistent
application of APA style.
The submission includes intext citations and
references for content that
is quoted, paraphrased, or
summarized and
demonstrates a consistent
application of APA style.
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:51:45 AM (EST)
CRITERION SCORE:
Competent
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017: Five outside sources that support the work are listed in the References section of
the submission and are referred to in-text without observable departures from the APA style
conventions.
E. PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
COMPETENCE
3. COMPETENT
Content is unstructured, is
disjointed, or contains
pervasive errors in
mechanics, usage, or
grammar. Vocabulary or
tone is unprofessional or
distracts from the topic.
Content is poorly
organized, is difficult to
follow, or contains errors in
mechanics, usage, or
grammar that cause
confusion. Terminology is
misused or ineffective.
Content reflects attention
to detail, is organized, and
focuses on the main ideas
as prescribed in the task or
chosen by the candidate.
Terminology is pertinent, is
used correctly, and
effectively conveys the
intended meaning.
Mechanics, usage, and
grammar promote accurate
interpretation and
understanding.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/03/2017 – A cohesive organizational paragraph structure is evident in the task. Recurring
issues that affect the professional communication of the work include concerns with sentence
fluency, conventions, word choice, and parts of speech. Specific concerns include ineffective
sentence construction, missing and extraneous words, comma splices, punctuation and spelling
issues, noun and other form usage errors, misused words, and other parts of speech issues.
Please click on the pdf file attached to this evaluation to download the task, which
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:51:45 AM (EST)
includes examples of the most pervasive writing concerns found within the submission.
The concerns noted appear throughout the document and must be identified and corrected
before resubmitting. Direct links from the Guide to Academic Writing Resource are also included
within the examples to assist with correcting these writing concerns throughout the work. For
more information regarding the four writing traits and assistance with addressing writing
concerns, please access the Guide to Academic Writing and contact the WGU Writing Center by
clicking on the link located in the rubric item “Professional Communication.”
Students are encouraged to schedule a live appointment with the WGU Writing Center. Student
Mentors and Course Mentors may also assist students with scheduling WGU Writing Center
appointments.
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:51:45 AM (EST)
Evaluation Results
AUTHOR: Karen Avelino-David
DATE EVALUATED: 12/02/2017 06:49:34 AM (MST)
FINAL SCORE
DRF TEMPLATE: Technical Communication (UG, C768, EWP1-0917)
Does not Meet
PROGRAM: Technical Communication (UG, C768, EWP1-0917)
EVALUATION METHOD: Using Rubric
Consultation with a Course Mentor is recommended.
12/02/2017
The submission presents the response to the call for proposals from the Seamus Company. The
Cover Sheet is complete and meets standards. Additional elaboration and detail is needed to explain
the proposal from the concept, to the costs details, to the justification and evaluation framework to
meet standards.
Detailed Results
APA STYLE
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
The proposal does not
The proposal provides
The proposal provides
provide formatting
according to APA style in
the proposal.
formatting according to
some APA style in the
proposal.
formatting according to
most APA style in the
proposal.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:52:18 AM (EST)
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
Some APA headings are present, which is fitting. Adherence to some aspects of APA, such as
page numbers, is not evident.
A. TITLE PAGE
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
A title page is not
The title page does not
The title page includes each
provided.
include each of the given
elements.
of the given elements.
CRITERION SCORE:
Competent
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
The Title Page includes all the given elements.
B. TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
COMPETENCE
3. COMPETENT
A table of contents is not
provided.
The table of contents does
not accurately correspond
with the sections of the
The table of contents
accurately corresponds with
the sections of the
proposal or does not
accurately list all of the
sections.
proposal and accurately
lists all of the sections.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:52:18 AM (EST)
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
The Table of Contents is present and lists the sections. Alignment with the sections and the
location is not evident.
C. ABSTRACT
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
An abstract is not
provided.
The abstract is not relevant
to the topic, does not
The abstract is relevant to
the topic, addresses each
address each of the given
of the given points, and
points, or does not align
with the proposal.
aligns with the proposal.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
An abstract introduces the idea of audio books. How the proposed solution directly addresses
the call for proposals with the given points is not observed.
D1. PROPOSED SOLUTION
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
An explanation of a
The explanation of the
The explanation of the
proposed solution does not
proposed solution does not
proposed solution
relate to the requirements
establish a clear
establishes a clear
of the RFP.
relationship between the
solution and the RFP.
relationship between the
solution and the RFP.
CRITERION SCORE:
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:52:18 AM (EST)
Approaching Competence
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
The proposed solution includes the use of audio books. Adequate detail for the proposed audio
books solution is not evident.
D2. CASE STUDY REVIEWS
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
An explanation is not
The explanation does not
The explanation provides
provided.
provide examples of how 3
examples of how 3 other
other organizations have
implemented solutions
organizations have
implemented solutions
related to the key elements
related to the key elements
of the proposal.
of the proposal.
CRITERION SCORE:
Not Evident
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
Some discussion of a cartoon for ‘making students understand English grammar’ is clearly
present. An explanation of how 3 other organizations implemented solutions related to the
proposed audio book solution is not observed.
D3. GOALS , OBJECTIVES, AND DELIVERABLES
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
A description of project
The description of project
The description of project
goals, objectives, and
goals, objectives, and
goals, objectives, and
deliverables is not
provided.
deliverables is unclear or
does not demonstrate how
deliverables is clear and
demonstrates how the
the goals, objectives, or
goals, objectives, and
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:52:18 AM (EST)
deliverables will be
deliverables will be
accomplished.
accomplished.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
One goal and three supporting objectives are presented, which is fitting. A clear description of
project goals, objectives, and deliverables that demonstrates how the goals, objectives, and
deliverables will be accomplished is not evident.
D4. PROJECTED TIMELINE
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
A timeline is not provided.
The timeline does not
The timeline includes
include completion dates of
completion dates of the
the deliverables, or the
timeline is otherwise
deliverables and is complete
and clear. The completion
incomplete or unclear. Or
dates are aligned with the
the completion dates are
deliverables.
not aligned with the
deliverables.
CRITERION SCORE:
Not Evident
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
Some of the order of what will occur during the launch is explained for an application
development. A timeline that includes completion dates of the deliverables that are aligned with
the deliverables in the Goals, Objectives and Deliverables aspect, is not observed.
D5. RESOURCES AND COSTS
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:52:18 AM (EST)
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
A list of resources and
The list of resources and
The list of resources and
costs is not provided.
associated costs does not
include all necessary
associated costs includes
all necessary resources and
resources or all estimated
all estimated costs to
costs to implement the
proposal. Or the sources of
implement the proposal.
The sources of the cost
the cost estimates are not
estimates are clear.
clear.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
Some of the costs are presented in a table. A complete, source supported list of the costs and
resources of the proposed project is not observed.
D6. OUTCOME
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
COMPETENCE
3. COMPETENT
An explanation is not
provided.
The explanation does not
use an evaluation
framework, or the
The explanation uses an
evaluation framework that
assesses the success or
evaluation framework does
not assess the success or
effectiveness of the
project.
effectiveness of the
project.
CRITERION SCORE:
Not Evident
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
The submission presents a proposed solution for audio books. The outcome aspect to present
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:52:18 AM (EST)
the evaluation framework is not observed.
E. JUSTIFICATION AND HIGHLIGHTS OF PROPOSAL
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
COMPETENCE
3. COMPETENT
A justification of the
technology solution is not
The justification of the
technology solution does
The justification of the
technology solution
provided.
not highlight the most
important aspects of the
highlights the most
important aspects of the
proposal or does not meet
the company’s business
priorities.
proposal and meets the
company’s business
priorities.
CRITERION SCORE:
Not Evident
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
The submission presents a proposed solution for audio books. The justification and highlights
of the proposal are not observed.
F. LETTER
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
No letter of transmittal or
The letter of transmittal or
The letter of transmittal or
cover letter is provided.
cover letter is
unprofessional in tone or
cover letter includes all o f
the given points and is
style, or the letter does not
include all of the given
points.
professional in tone and
style.
CRITERION SCORE:
Approaching Competence
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:52:18 AM (EST)
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
The letter for transmittal is present and clearly includes contact information. A polished letter
that includes all the given points is not observed.
G. APA SOURCES
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
3. COMPETENT
COMPETENCE
The submission does not
include in-text citations and
references according to APA
style for content that is
quoted, paraphrased, or
summarized.
The submission includes intext citations and
references for content that
is quoted, paraphrased, or
summarized but does not
demonstrate a consistent
application of APA style.
The submission includes intext citations and
references for content that
is quoted, paraphrased, or
summarized and
demonstrates a consistent
application of APA style.
CRITERION SCORE:
Not Evident
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
The Sources can be more accurately assessed once the other aspects have been revised.
H. PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
1. NOT EVIDENT
2. APPROACHING
COMPETENCE
3. COMPETENT
Content is unstructured, is
disjointed, or contains
pervasive errors in
mechanics, usage, or
grammar. Vocabulary or
tone is unprofessional or
Content is poorly
organized, is difficult to
follow, or contains errors in
mechanics, usage, or
grammar that cause
confusion. Terminology is
Content reflects attention
to detail, is organized, and
focuses on the main ideas
as prescribed in the task or
chosen by the candidate.
Terminology is pertinent, is
distracts from the topic.
misused or ineffective.
used correctly, and
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:52:18 AM (EST)
effectively conveys the
intended meaning.
Mechanics, usage, and
grammar promote accurate
interpretation and
understanding.
CRITERION SCORE:
Not Evident
COMMENTS ON THIS CRITERION:
12/02/2017
The Professional Communication can be more accurately assessed once the other aspects have
been revised.
Printed on: 12/08/2017 11:52:18 AM (EST)
Evaluation Results
Requirement: Technical Communication: EWP Task 1
AUTHOR: Karen Avelino-David
DATE EVALUATED: 12/03/2017 12:31:23 PM (MST)
FINAL SCORE
DRF TEMPLATE: Technical Communication (UG, C768, EWP1-0917)
Does not Meet
PROGRAM: Technical Communication (UG, C768, EWP1-0917)
EVALUATION METHOD: Using Rubric
General comments:
Note to student-A Content Evaluator evaluated the Content requirements for this submission, while
an Articulation of Response Evaluator evaluated the Professional Communication (Articulation)
aspect.
The Profess …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
How it works
- Paste your instructions in the instructions box. You can also attach an instructions file
- Select the writer category, deadline, education level and review the instructions
- Make a payment for the order to be assignment to a writer
- Download the paper after the writer uploads it
Will the writer plagiarize my essay?
You will get a plagiarism-free paper and you can get an originality report upon request.
Is this service safe?
All the personal information is confidential and we have 100% safe payment methods. We also guarantee good grades